The potential of regulating ecosystem service – filtering potential for inorganic pollutants – supplied by soils of Slovakia

  • Jarmila Makovníková National Agricultural and Food Centre/ Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute Bratislava, Regional Station Banská Bystrica
  • Boris Pálka
  • Miloš Širáň National Agricultural and Food Centre / Grassland and Mountain Agriculture Research Institute
  • Miroslava Kizeková National Agricultural and Food Centre / Grassland and Mountain Agriculture Research Institute
  • Radoslava Kanianska Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1729-8846
Keywords: ecosystem services, soil pollutants, filtering potential, Slovakia, district, region

Abstract

The concept of agroecosystem services combines environmental and socio-economic approaches to the analysis and evaluation of natural capital. A multi-criteria approach to spatial quantification of ecosystem services allows explicit assessment of the potential of agroecosystems to provide agroecosystem services and to adapt the land management under regional conditions. For the spatial quantifying of agroecosystem services potential of agricultural land in Slovakia, we have created a mapping unit by combining four input layers (climatic region, slope topography, soil texture and land use). In ecosystems of agricultural land, regulation of water regime, control of soil erosion, climate regulation and soil filtration are the main regulating services. Filtering potential was calculated as accumulative function of soil sorption potential and potential of total content of inorganic pollutants evaluated according to The Slovak Soil Law. Calculated potential was categorised into five categories (very low, low, medium, high and very high). The distribution of the filtering potential using spatial mapping units show that in Slovakia more than 41 per cent of agroecosystems have very high filtering potential (for inorganic pollutants), mostly in the Bratislava, Nitra and Trnava regions. Ecosystems with low potential (more than 41 per cent of agricultural land) are predominantly located on Fluvisols (along Váh, Hron and Bodrog rivers) with a higher content of risk elements in alluvial sediments (caused by anthropogenic deposition). The mountain soils on grassland are also strongly involved in very low category of filtering potential, predominantly in the Banská Bystrica, Žilina and Prešov regions. The greatest differences among regions was found in relation to climatic conditions, land use and the diversity of soil types.

References

Alam, M., Dupra, J. and Messier, C. 2016. A framework towards a composite indicator for urban ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 60. 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.035

Birghofer, K., Diehl, E., Andersson, J., Ekroos, J., Früh-Müller, A., Machnikowski, F., Mader, V.L., Nilsson, L., Sasaki, K., Rundlöf, M., Wolters, V. and Smith, H.G. 2015. Ecosystem services - current challenges and opportunities for ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 2 (12 January 2015).https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00087

Borûvka, L. and Drábek, O. 2004. Heavy metals distribution between fractions of humic substances in heavily polluted soils. Plant Soil Environment 50. (8): 339-345. https://doi.org/10.17221/4041-PSE

Burkhard, B. and Maes, J. (eds.) 2017. Mapping Ecosystem Services. Advanced Books. Sofia, Pensoft Publishers. Burkhard, B., Kandziorai, M.S. and Müller, F. 2014. Ecosystem Service Potentials, Flows and Demands - Concepts for Spatial Localisation, Indication and Quantification. Official Journal of the International Association for Landscape Ecology - Regional Chapter Germany (IALE-D). Available at: http://www.landscapeonline.de/103097lo201434

Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F. and Windhorst, W. 2009. Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services - a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online 15. (1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.200915

Costanza, R., Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S. and Grasso, M. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services 28. 1-16.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008

Coyle, C., Creamer, R.E., Schulte, R.P.O., O'Sullivan, L. and Jordan, P.A. 2016. Functional Land Management conceptual framework under soil drainage and land use scenarios. Environmental Science & Policy 56. 39-48. Čurlík, J. 2011. Potenciálne toxické stopové prvky a ich distribúcia v pôdach Slovenska (Potentially toxic trace elements and their distribution in the soil of Slovakia). Bratislava, PriFUK. (In Slovak) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.012

Dendoncker, N., Boeraeve, F., Crouzat, E., Dufręne, M., König, A. and Barnaud, C. 2018. How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions? Ecology and Society 23(1):12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09843-230112

Dominati, E.J. 2013. Natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. In Ecosystem services in New Zealand - conditions and trends. Ed.: Dymond, J.R., Lincoln, NZ, Manaaki Whenua Press, 132-142.

Dominati, E.J., Mackay, A., Lynch, B., Heath, N. and Millner, I. 2014. An ecosystem services approach to the quantification of shallow mass movement erosion and the value of soil conservation practices. Ecosystem Services 9. 204-215. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.006

Dominati, E.J., Patterson, M. and Mackay, A. 2010. A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils'. Ecological Economics 69. 1858-1868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002

Donisa, C., Mocanu, R. and Steinnes, E. 2003. Distribution of some major and minor elements between fulvic and humic fractions in natural soils. Geoderma 111. 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00254-9

Forouzangohar, M., Crossman, N.D., Richard, J., MacEwan, R.J., Dugal Wallace, O. and Bennett, L.T. 2014. Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes: A Spatially Explicit Approach to Support Sustainable Soil Management. Hindawi Corp. The Scientific World Journal 2014. Article ID 483298. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/483298

Frélichová, J. and Fanta, J. 2015. Ecosystem service availability in view of long-term land-use changes: a regional case study in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Health and Sustainabilty 1. (10): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1890/EHS15-0024.1

Greiner, L., Keller, A., Gret-Regamey, A. and Papritz, A. 2017. Soil function assessment: review of methods for quantifying the contributions of soils to ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 69. 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.025

Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M. and Kienast, F. 2012. Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecological Indicators 21. 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.004

Kobza, J., Barančíková, G., Dodok, R., Hrivňáková, K., Makovníková, J., Pálka, B., Pavlenda, P., Schlosserová, J., Styk, J. and Širáň, M. 2014. Monitoring pôd SR. Súčasný stav a vývoj monitorovaných vlastností pôd ako podklad k ich ochrane a ďaľšiemu využívaniu (2007-2012). (Current state and development of monitored soil properties as a basis for their protection and further use [2007-2012]). Bratislava, NPPC-VUPOP. (In Slovak)

Maes, J., Burkhard, B. and Geneletti, D. 2018. Ecosystem services are inclusive and deliver multiple values. A comment on the concept of nature's contributions to people. One Ecosystem 3: e24720. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24720

Makovníková, J. 2001. Distribution of Cd and Pb in main soil types of Slovakia. Agriculture 47. 903-912.

Makovníková, J. and Barancíková, G. 2009. Assessment of transport risk of cadmium and lead on the basis of Immobilisation capability of soil. Soil and Water Research 4. (1): 10-16. https://doi.org/10.17221/31/2008-SWR

Makovníková, J., Barančíková, G. and Pálka, B. 2007. Approach to the assessment of transport risk of inorganic pollutants based on the immobilisation capability of soil. Plant, Soil and Environment 53. 365-373. https://doi.org/10.17221/2215-PSE

MEA Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Our Human Planet: Summary for Decision Makers. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series, Vol. 5. Washington DC, Island Press.

Rodríguez, J.P., Beard, D.T.Jr., Bennett, E.M., Cumming, G.S., Cork, S.J., Agard, J., Dobson, A.P. and Peterson, G.D. 2006. Trade-offs across Space, Time and Ecosystem Services. Ecology and Society 11(1): 28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01667-110128

Spake, R., Lasseur, R., Crouzat, E., Bullock, J., Lavorel, S.E., Parks, K., Schaafsma, M., Bennett, E., Maes, J., Mulligan, M., Mouchet, M., Peterson, G., Schulp, C., Thuiller, W., Turner, M., Verburg, P. and Eigenbrod, F. 2017. Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 47. 37-50.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004

Published
2019-07-01
How to Cite
Makovníková, J., Pálka, B., Širáň, M., Kizeková, M., & Kanianska, R. (2019). The potential of regulating ecosystem service – filtering potential for inorganic pollutants – supplied by soils of Slovakia. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 68(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.68.2.5
Section
Articles