The revival of 'Central Europe' among Hungarian political elites: its meaning and geopolitical implications

Keywords: 'Central Europe', Hungary, Visegrad Four, geopolitical narratives, 'channel of protest'

Abstract

Over the past years, the concept of 'Central Europe' has been revived by Hungarian political elites and this study aims to find out how and why. It is based on a content analysis of political speeches and communications, compared with actual policies and statistical data. It is observed that the government is the only political force to engage in the new discourse of 'Central Europe'. The study finds that both the geographic extension and the connotations of 'Central Europe' have changed fundamentally. Often associated with the territories of the Dual monarchy up until the early 2000s, the notion today appears to be used synonymously with the likewise reinvigorated Visegrad Four. Yet while the latter has kept its geographic confines intact, 'Central Europe' has no clear boundaries. Such a malleable concept can more flexibly serve various geopolitical goals, such as Hungary's intention to include Croatia and Serbia. The meanings associated with 'Central Europe' have changed just as much. Not long ago a symbol for Hungary's (and its neighbours') 'return to Europe', Central Europe has re-emerged as a 'channel of protest' vis-á-vis the West. Disillusioned by the EU following the financial and refugee crises, Hungarian political elites have been envisioning 'Central Europe' as the continent's new growth hub and a safe space free from migrants. Economic data contradict the former vision. As Euroscepticism and a hard-line stance against refugees are no (longer) unique stands of the Visegrad Four, the question is what remains of 'Central Europe'.

References

24.hu 2016. A román miniszterelnök szerint Orbán visszavehetne (Romanian PM says Orbán could take it easier). December 8, 24.hu, 

About Hungary 2017. Hungarian government donates 3 million euros to helping Christians in Middle East. March 28, 2017. Cabinet Office of the Prime Minister. 

Anastasijevic, D. 2016. Croatia joins EU's illiberal democracy club. January 27, 2016. EUobserver.

Balogh, P. 2015. Returning to Eurasia from the heart of Europe? Geographical metanarratives in Hungary and beyond. In Beyond Transition? Memory and Identity Narratives in Eastern and Central Europe. Eds.: B. Törnquist-Plewa, N. Bernsand and Narvselius, E., Lund, Lund University, 191-208.

Bassin, M. 2012. National Metanarratives after Communism: An Introduction. Eurasian Geography and Economics 53. (5): 553-556. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.53.5.553

Benz, M. 2014. Wo man sich über die deutschen Exporterfolge freut (Where German successes in exports are rejoiced over). September 26, Neue Zürcher Zeitung

Buckley, N. and Foy, H. 2016. The Visegrad four: Brussels' eastern critics. August 29, Financial Times,

Byrne, A. 2016. Hungary to offer EU's lowest corporate tax rate. November 17, 2016. Financial Times,

Chmiel, J. 2017. Cooperation in the Visegrad Four Group. April 26, 2017. Budapest, Public lecture of the Czech Ambassador to Hungary, held at Andrássy University Budapest.

COPM 2016. Central Europe is experiencing a renaissance. Cabinet Office of the Prime Minister December 9, 2016. 

COPM and MTI 2017a. The representatives of global capital must be made accountable. Cabinet Office of the Prime Minister, February 24, 2017. 

COPM and MTI 2017b. The EU must change in order for Europe to remain the best place in the world. Cabinet Office of the Prime Minister, March 30, 2017. 

Dutta, S. ed. 2011. The Global Innovation Index 2011: Accelerating Growth and Development. Fontainebleau, INSEAD.

Dutta, S., Lanvin, B. and Wunsch-Vincent, S. eds. 2017. The Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation Feeding the World. 10th edition, Ithaca and Fontainebleau and Geneva, Cornell University and INSEAD and WIPO.

Egedy, T. 2012. The effects of global economic crisis in Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 61. (2): 155-173.

Erşen, E. 2013. The Evolution of 'Eurasia' as a Geopolitical Concept in Post-Cold War Turkey. Geopolitics 18. (1): 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.665106

Farkas, Z.A., Pap, N. and Reményi, P. 2016. Hungary's place on Eurasian rail land bridges and the eastern opening. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 65. (1): 3-14. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.65.1.1

Felvidék.Ma 2016. Orbán Viktor Tusványoson: Létre kell hozni egy európai hadsereget (Viktor Orbán at Tusványos: a European army must be established). July 23, 2016. 

Foy, H. and Buckley, N. 2016. Orban and Kaczynski vow 'cultural counter-revolution' to reform EU. September 7, 2016. Financial Times.

Foy, H. and Byrne, A. 2016. Splits over EU test relations between Visegrad Four. October 6, 2016. Financial Times, 

Hajdú, Z. 2013. Transformation of the Hungarian spatial views concerning the Danube region in the period around the end of World War II and the start of the rearrangement, 1944-1948. Problemi na Geografijata 1-2. 74-88.

Higgins, A. 2015. Hungary's migrant stance, once denounced, gains some acceptance. December 20, The New York Times.

Index 2016. Ilyen, amikor focisták irányítják a külkereskedelmet (When footballers are managing foreign trade). July 11, 2016. Index.hu, 

ISD ed. 2014. Common spatial development strategy of the V4+2 countries. Brno, Institute for Spatial Development.

KamaraOnline 2015. Orbán: Közép-Európa növekedési központja lehetünk(Orbán: we may become Central Europe's growth pole). October 2, 2015. 

Kaniok, P. 2015. The refugee crisis is the Visegrad Group's moment of truth. October 1, 2015. Europe's World.

KSH 2017. A Magyarország és Németország közötti kapcsolatok (Relations between Hungary and Germany). January 13, 2017. KSH Hungarian Central Statistical Office.

Kundera, M. 1984. The Tragedy of Central Europe. The New York Review of Books 31. (7): 33-38.

Laclau, E. 1996. Why do empty signifiers matter to politics? In Emancipation(s). Ed.: Laclau, E., London and New York, Verso, 36-46.

Magyar Nemzet 2013. Orbán: Közép-Európa visszatért a térképre (Orbán: Central Europe has returned on the map). November 21, 2013.

Magyar Nemzet 2014. Orbán: Közép-Európa lehet Európa megújulásának motorja (Orbán: Central Europe can be the engine of Europe's renewal). January 29, 2014. 

Mandiner 2013a. Orbán: Ígéretes régió lehet Közép-Európa a jordániaiaknak (Orbán: Central Europe can be a promising region for Jordanians). March 18, 2013. 

Mandiner 2013b. Orbán: Közép-Európa évtizede következik (Orbán: Central Europe's decade coming up). June 23, 2013. 

MASZOL and MTI 2013. Orbán Indiában: vegyék fel a térképükre Közép-Európát!(Orbán in India: Put up Central Europe on your map!). October 17, 2013. MASZOL, 

Mező, F. 2001. Közép-Európa fogalmi változása térben és időben (The changing concept of Central Europe in space and time). Tér és Társadalom 15. (3-4): 81-103.

Miletics, P. and Pál, V. 1998. A közép-európai tér fejlődésének kérdései (The issues of the development of the Central European space). Földrajzi Értesítő 47. (2): 217-233.

miniszterelnok.hu 2017a. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's speech at the Lámfalussy Conference. January 25, Website of the Hungarian Government.

miniszterelnok.hu 2017b. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's State of the Nation Address. February 14, Website of the Hungarian Government.

miniszterelnok.hu 2017c. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's speech at the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry's ceremony to mark the start of the 2017 business year. March 2, Website of the Hungarian Government.

MNE 2017. Closer Hungarian-Slovenian economic relations to help improve competitiveness of Central Europe. Ministry for National Economy. February 6, 2017. 

Moisio, S. 2002. EU eligibility, Central Europe, and the invention of applicant state narrative. Geopolitics 7. (3): 89-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000971

MTI 2011. Orbán: Közép-Európán múlik egész Európa gazdasági jövője (Orbán: the economic future of entire Europe depends on Central Europe). January 23, 2011. ma.hu.

MTI 2015. Orbán: Közép-Európa az EU növekedési motorja lesz (Orbán: Central Europe will be the EU'sgrowth engine). October 12, 2015. 

MTI 2016. Kormányszóvivő: a V4-ek közösen védik a közép-európaiak szerzett jogait (Government spokesperson: the V4 will together defend the rights obtained by Central Europeans). June 30, 2016. 

MTI 2017a. Hungary lost USD 6.5 billion due to sanctions against Russia. January 24, 2017.

MTI 2017b. Many in the West today are still making excuses for the crimes of communism. February 25, 2017.

MTI 2017c. The European future lies in the Visegrád Four. March 29, 2017.

MTI 2017d. It is our firm expectation with regard to Ukraine that it must guarantee the rights of the Hungarian minority. April 13, 2017. 

MTI and kormany.hu 2017. Hungary wholeheartedly supports Visegrád declaration. March 2, 2017. 

MTI-Eco 2014. Orbán: Közép-Európa lesz az európainövekedés motorja (Orbán: Central Europe will be Europe's growth engine). November 11, 2014.

MTVA 2017. Lázár's presser / Orbán in Brussels / Billboard ads. Hungary Matters June 23 morning issue, MTVA, 

Nádas, N. 2011. A Visegrádi csoport (V4) szerepének néhány kérdése a tagállamok EU csatlakozását követően, különös tekintettel a közös érdekképviseletre (Some questions regarding the role of the Visegrad Group following EU enlargement, focusing on the representation of common interests). MA thesis, Budapest, Budapesti Gazdasági Főiskola.

Neumann, I.B. 1993. Russia as Central Europe's constituting Other. East European Politics and Societies 7. (2): 349-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325493007002006

Nič, M. 2016. The Visegrád Group in the EU: 2016 as a turning-point? European View 15. (2): 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-016-0422-6

NOL 2016. Orbán szerint Közép-Európa jelenti ma az "európai álmot" (According to Orbán, Central Europe today represents the 'European dream'). September 6, 2016. 

O'Loughlin, J., Ó Tuathail, G. and Kolossov, V. 2006. The geopolitical orientations of ordinary Russians: a public opinion analysis. Eurasian Geography and Economics 47. (2): 129-152. https://doi.org/10.2747/1538-7216.47.2.129

Orbán, V. 2006. 20 év: beszédek, írások, interjúk (1986-2006) (20 years: speeches, scripts, interviews [1986-2006]). Budapest, Heti Válasz Kiadó.

Orbán, V. 2010. Rengéshullámok (Vibration waves). Budapest, Helikon Kiadó.

orbanviktor.hu 2012. A jó romániai döntés: távolmaradni az urnáktól (The right decision in Romania: to stay away from the ballot-boxes). July 28, 2012.

Pálinkás, J. 2016. The unison of four poor persons will not lead to their common wealth. March 8, 2016.

profit7.hu 2014. Várja a kínai pénzt Közép-Európa (Central Europe awaiting Chinese money). December 15, 2014.

Romsics, I. 2014. Közép- és/vagy Kelet-Európa? Egy terminológiai vita (Central and/or Eastern Europe? A terminological debate). Rubicon 26. (1): Special issue, 56-61.

Schmidt, A. 2016. Friends forever? The Role of the Visegrad Group and European Integration. Politics in Central Europe 12. (3): 113-140. Crossref

Szakacs, G. and Kasolowsky, R. 2016. Hungary suffering worst labour shortage on record-survey. October 25, 2016.

Svensson, S., Cartwright, A. and Balogh, P. 2017. Solidarity at the border: The organization of spontaneous support for transiting refugees in two Hungarian towns in the summer of 2015. Working Paper 1. 2017. Budapest, CEU Center for Policy Studies.

Tóth, P. 2016. Orbán Viktor szerint gazdasági sikertörténet lesz Közép-Európa(According to Viktor Orbán, Central Europe will be an economic success story). November 22, 2016. 

VoteWatch Europe 2017. Polish approach weakens V4's leverage to influence the future of Europe. March 20, 2017. 

Wieclawski, J. 2016. Considering the sub-regional cooperation in East-Central Europe - Some conclusions on integrating and disintegrating tendencies in the sub-regional dialogue. Review of European and Russian Affairs 10. (1): 1-23.

Wolff, L. 1994. Inventing Eastern Europe: The map of civilization on the mind of the Enlightenment. Stanford, Stanford University Press.

Published
2017-10-05
How to Cite
BaloghP. (2017). The revival of ’Central Europe’ among Hungarian political elites: its meaning and geopolitical implications. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 66(3), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.66.3.1
Section
Articles