Perception, understanding, and action: attitudes of climate change in the Hungarian population

  • Ferenc Jankó University of Sopron, Alexandre Lámfalussy Faculty of Economics, Erzsébet st. 9. Sopron, Hungary http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1149-6745
  • Laura Bertalan University of Sopron, Alexandre Lámfalussy Faculty of Economics Erzsébet st. 9. Sopron, 9400 Hungary
  • Mónika Hoschek University of Sopron, Alexandre Lámfalussy Faculty of Economics Erzsébet st. 9. Sopron, 9400 Hungary
  • Karolina Komornoki Elisabeth Educational Hospital of Sopron, Győri st. 15. Sopron, 9400 Hungary
  • Nikoletta Németh University of Sopron, Alexandre Lámfalussy Faculty of Economics Erzsébet st. 9. Sopron, 9400 Hungary
  • Judit Papp-Vancsó Gyula Roth Technical School of Forestry and Wood Industry, Szent György St. 9, Sopron 9400 Hungary
Keywords: climate change, perception, responsibility, climate adaptation, climate change denial, Hungary

Abstract

This study is based on a non-representative, national level survey sample whose main purpose is to interpret the general population’s understanding of climate change. The study also provides an examination of correlations between climate change concerns and the taking of individual action as well as the relationship between pro-environmental thinking and climate change scepticism. Our results show a moderate correlation between the general population’s concerns and the professional views on the subject, known in the literature as the New Environmental Paradigm scale and Scepticism scale, but a significantly weaker correlation when it comes to taking action against climate change. Factors relating to the respondents, such as residence settlement type, education level, gender, age, personal and social values, or casual attributions in relation to climate change heavily influence this weaker correlation. Most respondents assessed climate change as a current (urgent), but geographically remote phenomenon. This is a clear indication of problems associated with cognitive conceptualization and the localization of climate change in communication. The target audience must be taken into account when designing climate change communications because interpretations of climate change can vary widely and cover a broad range attitudes ranging from concern about to issue all the way to climate change scepticism. This also applies to views concerning responsibility for climate change with some believing it is a political responsibility and others believing it is a scientific responsibility.

References

Akerlof, K., Maibach, E.W., Fitzgerald, D., Cedeno, A.Y. and Neuman, A. 2013. Do people ''personally experience'' global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Global Environmental Change 23. 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006

Antal, Z.L. 2015. Klímaparadoxonok (Climate paradoxons). Budapest, L'Harmattan Kiadó.

Bajmóczy, P., Boros, L., Csatári, B., Dudás, R., Farkas, J.Zs., Juray, T., Kovács, Z. and Pál, V. 2012. Managing the socio-economic consequences of the climate change. In Review of climate change research program at the University of Szeged. Eds.: Rakonczai, J. and Ladányi, Zs., Szeged, University of Szeged, Institute of Geography and Geology, 105–120.

Baranyai, N. and Varjú, V. 2015. A lakosság klímaváltozással kapcsolatos attitűdjének empirikus vizsgálata (Empirical study of citizens' attitude towards climate change). In Klímaváltozás – társadalom – gazdaság. Hosszú távú területi folyamatok és trendek Magyarországon. Eds.: Czirfusz, M., Hoyk, E. and Suvák, A., Pécs, Publikon Kiadó, 257–284.

Bartholy, J., Pongrácz, R. and Pieczka, I. 2014. How the climate will change in this century? Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 63. (1): 55–67. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.63.1.5

Bereczki, B.H. 2012. A klímaváltozás médiadiskurzusai (Media-discourses of climate change). Korunk 23. (2): 14–21.

Bobvos, J., Málnási, T., Rudnai, T., Cserbik, D. and Páldy, A. 2017. The effect of climate change on heat-related excess mortality in Hungary at different area levels. Időjárás 121. (1): 43–62.

Brace, C. and Georghegan, H. 2010. Human geographies of climate change: Landscape, temporality and lay knowledges. Progress in Human Geography 35. (3): 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510376259

Broomell, S.B., Budescu, D.V. and Por, H-H. 2015. Personal experience with climate change predicts intentions to act. Global Environmental Change 32. 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.001

Brulle, R.J., Carmichael, J. and Jenkins, J.C. 2012. Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Climatic Change 114. (2): 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y

Corner, A., Whitmarsh, L. and Xenias, D. 2012. Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: biased assimilation and attitude polarisation. Climatic Change 114. (3–4): 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6

Demeritt, D. 2001. Geographical work at the bounda- ries of climate change. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91. (2): 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00245

Donner, S.D. 2011. Making the climate a part of the human world. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 92. 1297–1302. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS3219.1

Dunlap, R.E. and McCright, A.M. 2011. Organized climate change denial. In Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Eds.: Schlosberg, D., Dryzek, J. and Norgaard, R., Cambridge, Oxford University Press, 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0010

Dunlap, R.E. and van Liere, K.D. 1978. The "New Environmental Paradigm" A Proposed Measuring Instrument and Preliminary Results. Journal of Environmental Education 9. 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875

Dunlap, R.E., van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G. and Jones, R.E. 2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 56. (3): 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176

Egan, P.J. and Mullin, M. 2012. Turning Personal Experience into Political Attitudes: The Effect of Local Weather on Americans' Perceptions about Global Warming. Journal of Politics 74. (3): 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000448

Farkas, J.Zs., Hoyk, E. and Rakonczai, J. 2017. Geographical analysis of climate vulnerability at a regional scale: the case of the Southern Great Plain in Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 66. (2): 129–144. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.66.2.3

Farmer, G.T. and Cook, J. 2013. Understanding Climate Change Denial. In Climate Change Science: A Modern Synthesis. Dordrecht, Springer, 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5757-8_23

Formádi, K. 2013. A klímaváltozás, mint kockázat érzékelése és a megoldásával kapcsolatos attitűdök szakirodalmi vizsgálata (Literature review of climate change: perception of risk and attitudes of solution). Iskolakultúra 12. 49–58.

Hamilton, L.C. and Stampone, M.D. 2013. Blowin' in the Wind: Short-Term Weather and Belief in Anthropogenic Climate Change. Weather, Climate and Society 5. 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00048.1

Hulme, M. 2008. Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33. 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00289.x

Hulme, M. 2009. Why we disagree about climate change? Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841200

Hulme, M. 2014. Attributing weather extremes to 'climate change': A review. Progress in Physical Geography 38. (4): 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314538644

Jankó, F. 2015. Éghajlatváltozással kapcsolatos tudás a világháló magyar részén (Climate change knowledge on the Hungarian web). Tér és Társadalom 29. (2): 67–89.

Jankó, F., Móricz, N. and Papp-Vancsó, J. 2010. Klímaváltozás: tudományos viták és a társadalomföldrajz feladatai (Climate change: controversies in science and the objectives of human geography). Földrajzi Közlemények 134. (4): 405–418.

Jankó, F., Móricz, N. and Papp-Vancsó, J. 2011. Klímaváltozás: diskurzusok a katasztrófától a kételkedésig (Climate change: discourses from catastro- phe to scepticism). Földrajzi Közlemények 135. (1): 3–16.

Kajner, P., Czira, T., Selmeczi, P. and Sütő, A. 2017. National Adaptation Geo-information System in climate. Időjárás 121. (4): 345–370.

Király, G., Czirfusz, M., Koós, B., Tagai, G. and Uzzoli, A. 2017. Population projection for Hungary and its relation with climate change. Europa XXI 32. 5–19. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2017.32.1

Kőszegi, M., Bottlik, Zs., Telbisz, T. and Mari, L. 2015. Human-environment relationships in modern and postmodern geography. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64. (2): 87–99. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.64.2.1

Lorenzoni, I. and Pidgeon, N.F. 2006. Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change 77. 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z

Manzo, K. 2010. Imaging vulnerability: the iconography of climate change. Area 42. 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00887.x

Manzo, K. 2012. Earthworks: The geopolitical visions of climate change cartoons. Political Geography 31. 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.09.001

Mesterházy, I., Mészáros, R. and Pongrácz, R. 2014. The effects of climate change on grape production in Hungary. Időjárás 118. (3): 193–206.

Moser, S.C. 2010. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Climate Change 1. 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11

Mosoni-Fried, J., Pálinkó, É. and Stefán, E. 2008. Klímaváltozás a közvélemény-kutatások tükrében (Climate change in public opinion polls). Klíma-21 füzetek 49. 45–58.

Myers, T.A., Maibach, E.W, Roser-Renouf, C., Akerlof, K. and Leiserowitz, A.A. 2013. The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Climate Change 3. 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1754

Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N. and Brown, B. 2010. Theory and language of climate change communication. WIREs Climate Change 1. (1): 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.2

Salamin, G., Kohán, Z., Dobozi, E. and Péti, M. 2011. Climate-friendly cities: a handbook on the tasks and possibilities of European cities in relation to climate change. Budapest, Ministry of Interior – VÁTI.

Schäfer, M.S. 2012. Online communication on climate change and climate politics: a literature review. WIREs Climate Change 3. (6): 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.191

Searle, K. and Gow, K. 2010. Do concerns about climate change lead to distress? International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 2. (4): 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/17568691011089891

Stoknes, P.E. 2014. Rethinking climate communications and the "psychological climate paradox". Energy Research & Social Science 1. 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.007

Szirmai, V., Molnár, B., Szépvölgyi, Á., Schuchmann, J. and Váradi, Zs. 2008. A klímaváltozás térbeli hatásai a budapesti társadalomban (Regional effects of climate change in the society of Budapest). Klíma-21 füzetek 54. 51–71.

TÁRKI 2007. Klímaváltozás a nyilvánosságban (Climate change in public discourse). Társadalmi Klíma Riport 1. Budapest, TÁRKI Image Factory. Accessed: 11.01. 2017.

TNS 2009. Europeans' attitudes towards climate change. Special Eurobarometer 313. TNS Opinion & Social, European Parliament and European Commission. Accessed: 11.12. 2017.

TNS 2011. Climate change. Special Eurobarometer 372. TNS Opinion & Social, European Commission. Accessed: 11.12. 2017.

TNS 2014. Climate change. Special Eurobarometer 409. TNS Opinion & Social, European Commission. Accessed: 11.12. 2017.

TNS 2017. Climate change. Special Eurobarometer 459. TNS Opinion & Social, European Commission. Accessed: 11.12. 2017.

Weber, E.U. and Stern, P.C. 2011. Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States. American Psychologist 66. (4): 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023253

Whitmarsh, L. 2011. Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change 21. 690–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016

Published
2018-06-30
How to Cite
Jankó, F., Bertalan, L., Hoschek, M., Komornoki, K., Németh, N., & Papp-Vancsó, J. (2018). Perception, understanding, and action: attitudes of climate change in the Hungarian population. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 67(2), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.67.2.4
Section
Articles