Hungarian Review of Sociology https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle <p>Review of Sociology is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal of the Hungarian Sociological Association, which publishes mainly original social scientific analyses and publications related to the Hungarian sociological scene. The journal invites original research on Hungary and Central and Eastern European societies, as well as analyses of social processes affecting the region from a broader perspective. It also welcomes innovative theoretical and methodological contributions of a more general nature.&nbsp;<br>It publishes four issues a year, each issue with a mixture of articles in Hungarian and English. The journal typically publishes one thematic issue per year, with guest editors assisting the editorial team. The journal is published in print and online.<br>In 2008, Review of Sociology received the Quality Award of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (“MTA”) and the Academy Publishing House. The journal is indexed in the following databases: Scopus, Google Scholar, MTMT, Dimensions, Lens, Scilit, CORE, and BASE. The publication of the journal is supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.</p> hu-HU szociologiai.szemle@szociologia.hu (A Szociológiai Szemle szerkesztősége) szociologiai.szemle@szociologia.hu (Ligeti Anna Sára) Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000 OJS 3.1.2.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Health inequalities at birth within the Hungarian 2018–2019 birth cohort: socioeconomic determinants of low birth weight infants https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/16172 <p>Objective: Low birth weight (LBW) is a significant global factor linked to numerous health risks, both in early life and extending into adulthood. Our analysis estimates how maternal education and other socioeconomic status characteristics influence the risk of low birth weight in Hungary.<br>Methods: The source of the data is the Cohort ’18 Growing up in Hungary longitudinal birth cohort survey. The nationally representative sample of 10 per cent includes women who gave birth to a child between spring 2018-2019. Data from 8183 women are analysed, excluding twin pregnancies. Generalized structural equation modelling (GSEM) was used to examine the magnitude of the direct and indirect association between maternal education and low birth weight (LBW), through additional socioeconomic status (SES) characteristics of the mother such as household income, occupational status, ethnic background and place of residence, controlling for key biological, demographic, health and lifestyle characteristics of mother and child.<br>Results: Women with up to 8th grade education are three times more likely to have a low birth weight child than women with tertiary education (11.8 per cent vs. 3.6 per cent), but they are also significantly more likely to have a low birth weight child than either women with vocational education (6.8 per cent) or women with secondary education (4.4 per cent). When the direct and indirect relationships between maternal education, other SES indicators and LBW are considered, the share of direct effect between maternal education and having a low birth weight child is 73 per cent of the total effect, while the indirect effect is 27 per cent of the total effect. This is the proportion of the combined indirect effect of household income, occupational status, Roma ethnic background and place of residence relative to the total effect. Of these, the indirect effect of educational attainment measured through household income is the largest, at 26 per cent of the total effect.</p> Laura Szabó, Julianna Boros Copyright (c) 2025 Hungarian Review of Sociology https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/16172 Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Infertility and assisted reproduction in a demographic, psychosocial and sociocultural context https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/15567 <p>The main topic of our study is infertility and its effects at the individual and societal levels. After a brief discussion of the issue of childlessness, we discuss the difficulties of conceptualising infertility. We explore the possible biological, psychological and social factors underlying infertility. We detail the specific micro-, meso-, exo- and macro-level human ecological influences and challenges faced by families diagnosed with infertility and/or involved in assisted reproductive procedures. The specialties that characterize people with infertility are presented in the context of individuals, couple relationships, family, and friendship. The social influences that affect the development of infertility and the availability and effectiveness of treatment are also briefly discussed. Our study aims to demonstrate the need for an interdisciplinary approach to infertility and highlight the issues still lacking in Hungary and, therefore, deserve further research.</p> Anna Lengyel, Ildikó Danis Copyright (c) 2025 Hungarian Review of Sociology https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/15567 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 05:39:02 +0000 The personal and social drama of work https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/15394 <p>The work of Everett C. Hughes (1897–1983) is barely known in Hungary. In the United States, too, he is on the periphery of the pantheon of sociology (Helmes-Hayes–Santoro 2016), his reputation and influence cannot be compared to his contemporaries such as Parsons or Lazarsfeld. The reason is that, unlike the latter, he did not systematically develop his theoretical or methodological principles. This was a conscious decision by Hughes. He believed that the anchorage of the methodological or theoretical framework would limit the understanding of the research subject, would be contrary to the ‘sociological imagination’ and could lead to dogmatism. In my study, I try to reconstruct and present Hughes’ theoretical and methodological foundations, based on the international literature and focusing on his research in the field of sociology of work. Indeed, these can be identified in his work and had a significant influence on his students - to mention only the best known - Goffman, Becker, Strauss, Whyte, in other words all those who are today considered the second generation of the Chicago School.</p> Gergely Magos Copyright (c) 2025 Hungarian Review of Sociology https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/15394 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 05:41:06 +0000 Who prefers to stay? https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/17177 <p>Based on the migration models of Carling (2002), de Haas (2021), and Schewel (2020), we examine the (im)mobility aspirations of minority and majority Hungarian students in Central Europe, interpreting their decision to stay as an immobility strategy. We aim to join the line of research arguing that both mobility and immobility are possible responses to an individual’s life circumstances or changes in them (Fischer &amp; Malmberg, 1997). Our aim is to identify individual as well as academic, institutional factors which we hypothesise support students in developing their immobility aspirations. We analyse empirical data based on an international survey. The quantitative survey was based on probability sampling and was conducted in 2019 among students of Hungarian-language higher education institutions in Hungary, Ukraine, Romania, Slovakia, and Serbia (N=2210). The results of multivariate and logistic regression analyses show that the development of immobility aspirations is supported by socio-demographic factors and social networks as well as by institutional and academic factors, such as training programmes preparing students for local professions and a greater degree of trust in the higher education institution and role partners. We aim to contribute with these findings to the academic discourse analysing the migration decisions of minority and majority Hungarians in Central Europe and to draw attention to the impact of higher education integration in a previously mostly undetected area.</p> Zsuzsanna Sütő Copyright (c) 2025 Hungarian Review of Sociology https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/17177 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 05:43:06 +0000 A little thoughtfulness https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/17226 Andrea Sólyom Copyright (c) 2025 Hungarian Review of Sociology https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/17226 Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Kovály Katalin: Az etnikai kapcsolati tőke földrajza – Ukrajnai vállalkozók a transznacionalitás útján, Gondolat, 2024 https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/18054 Endre Sik Copyright (c) 2025 Hungarian Review of Sociology https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/18054 Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000 "We're not heroes, we're just trying to be honest" https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/18272 Magdolna Leveleki Copyright (c) 2025 Hungarian Review of Sociology https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/szocszemle/article/view/18272 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 05:44:55 +0000