Consumption rate and dietary choice of cattle on meadow steppe vegetation

  • Nóra Balogh University of Debrecen, Department of Ecology
  • Béla Tóthmérész University of Debrecen, Department of Ecology
  • Orsolya Valkó University of Debrecen, Department of Ecology
  • Balázs Deák MTA-DE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Research Group
  • Tamás Miglécz University of Debrecen, Department of Ecology
  • Katalin Tóth MTA-DE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Research Group
  • Zsolt Molnár MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany
  • Csaba Vadász Kiskunság National Park Directorate
  • Edina Tóth MTA-DE Lendület Functional and Restoration Ecology Research Group
  • Réka Kiss University of Debrecen, Department of Ecology
  • Judit Sonkoly MTA-DE Lendület Functional and Restoration Ecology Research Group
  • Péter Török MTA-DE Lendület Functional and Restoration Ecology Research Group
  • Károly Antal Karcag Research Institute, RIEF, University of Debrecen
  • Júlia Tüdősné Budai Karcag Research Institute, RIEF, University of Debrecen
  • András Kelemen University of Debrecen, Department of Ecology; MTA TKI, MTA’s Post Doctoral Research Program
Keywords: biomass, grassland, grazing, leaf traits, litter, nitrogen content, palatability, SLA

Abstract

Grasslands have been exposed to detrimental land-use changes worldwide in the recent past, including agricultural intensification and the cessation of management. The maintenance of traditional management and understanding its effects on vegetation is essential for effective biodiversity conservation. Therefore we studied the direct effects of grazing on species-rich meadow steppes and the underlying mechanisms of dietary choice of cattle using trait-based approaches. Our study sitem was divided into two adjacent grazing units, managed differently in the study year. The control unit was ungrazed in the year of sampling while the other one was grazed for three months before the sampling with 0.3–0.5 animal unit/ha. We collected 70 randomly selected above-ground biomass samples (20cm×20cm) in both units in the middle of June 2014. Samples were sorted to litter, moss biomass and green biomass of each vascular plant species separately, and then dry weights were measured. The consumption of the litter and moss biomass was negligible, while cattle ingested 65% of green biomass of vascular plants. Cattle showed significant preference to species characterized by high specific leaf area and high nitrogen content. Our study underline that it is important to consider the productivity and plant traits (i.e. SLA) during the planning of a sustainable grazing regime.

References

Altesor, A., Oesterheld, M., Leoni, E., Lazama, F. & Rodríguez, C. (2005): Effect of grazing on community structure and productivity of a Uruguayan grassland. – Plant Ecol. 179: 83–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-004-5800-5

Amiaud, B., Touzard, B., Bonis, A. & Bouzillé, J.-B. (2008): After grazing exclusion, is there any modification of strategy for two guerrilla species: Elymus repens (L.) Gould and Agrostis stolonifera (L.)? – Plant Ecol. 197: 107–117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9364-z

Anderson, M. T. & Frank, D. A. (2003): Defoliation effects on reproductive biomass: importance of scale and timing. – J. Range Manage. 56: 501–516. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/4003843

Bork, E., Willms, W., Tannas, S. & Alexander, M. (2012): Seasonal patterns of forage availability in the Fescue grasslands under contrasting grazing histories. – Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 65: 47–55. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-11-00087.1

Carilla, J., Aragón, R. & Gurvich, D. E. (2011): Fire and grazing differentially affect aerial biomass and species composition in Andean grasslands. – Acta Oecol. 37: 337–345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2011.03.006

Coppock, D. L., Swift, D. M. & Ellis, J. E. (1986): Seasonal nutritional characteristics of livestock diets in a nomadic pastoral ecosystem. – J. Appl. Ecol. 23: 585–595. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2404038

Deák, B., Valkó, O., Kelemen, A., Török, P. Miglécz, T., Ölvedi, T., Lengyel, Sz. & Tóthmérész, B. (2011): Litter and graminoid biomass accumulation suppresses weedy forbs in grassland restoration. – Plant Biosyst. 145: 730–737. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2011.601336

Deák, B., Valkó, O., Török, P., Kelemen, A., Miglécz, T., Szabó, Sz., Szabó, G. & Tóthmérész, B. (2015): Micro-topographic heterogeneity increases plant diversity in old stages of restored grasslands. – Basic. Appl. Ecol. 16: 291–299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2015.02.008

Díaz, S., Noy-Meir, I. & Cabido, M. (2001): Can grazing response of herbaceous plants be predicted from simple vegetative traits? – J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 497–508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00635.x

Házi, J., Penksza, K., Bartha, S., Hufnagel, L., Tóth, A., Gyuricza, Cs. & Szentes, Sz. (2012): Cut mowing and grazing effects with grey cattle on plant species composition in case of Pannon wet grasslands. – Appl. Ecol. Env. Res. 10: 223–231. doi: https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1003_223231

Hill, M. O., Evans, D. F. & Bell, S. A. (1992): Long-term effects of excluding sheep from hill pastures in North Wales. – J. Ecol. 80: 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2261058

Hofstede, R. G. M., Castillo, M.,X. M. & Osorio, C. M. R. (1995): Biomass of grazed, burned, and undisturbed paramo grasslands, Colombia. I. Aboveground Vegetation. – Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 27: 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1552062

Illius, A. W., Clark, D. A. & Hodgson, J. (1992): Discrimination and patch choice by sheep grazing grass-clover swards. – J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 183–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/5521

Kauffman, J. B., Thorpe, A. S. & Brookshire, J. E. N. (2004): Livestock exclusion and belowground ecosystem responses in riparian meadows of eastern oregon. – Ecol. Appl. 14: 1671–1679. doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5083

Kelemen, A., Lazzaro, L., Besnyői, V., Albert, Á.-J., Konečná, M., Dobay, G., Memelink, I., Adamec, V., Götzenberger, L., de Bello, F., Le Bagousse-Pinguet, Y. & Lepš J. (2015): Net outcome of competition and facilitation in a wet meadow changes with plant’s life stage and community productivity. – Preslia 87: 347–361.

Kelemen, A., Tölgyesi, C., Kun, R., Molnár, Z., Vadász, C. & Tóth, K. (2017): Positive small-scale effects of shrubs on diversity and flowering in pastures. – Tuexenia 37: 399–413. doi: https://doi.org/10.14471/2017.37.009

Kelemen, A., Török, P., Valkó, O., Deák, B., Miglécz, T., Tóth, K., Ölvedi, T. & Tóthmérész, B. (2014): Sustaining recovered grasslands is not likely without proper management: vegetation changes after cessation of mowing. – Biodivers. Conserv. 23: 741–751. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0631-8

Kelemen, A., Török, P., Valkó, O., Miglécz, T. & Tóthmérész, B. (2013): Mechanisms shaping plant biomass and species richness: plant strategies and litter effect in alkali and loess grasslands. – J. Veg. Sci. 24: 1195–1203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12027

Király, G. (szerk.) (2009): Új magyar füvészkönyv. Magyarország hajtásos növényei. Határozókulcsok. – Aggteleki Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság, Jósvafő, 616 p.

Mattson, W. J. Jr. (1980): Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. – Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 119–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001003

Memmott, K. L., Anderson, V. J. & Monsen, S. B. (1998): Seasonal grazing impact on cryptogamic crusts in a Cold desert Ecosystem. – J. Range. Manage. 51: 547–550. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/4003374

Molnár, Z., Bíró, M., Bölöni, J. & Horváth, F. (2008): Distribution of the (semi-)natural habitats in Hungary I. Marshes and grasslands. – Acta Bot. Hung. 50: 59–105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1556/ABot.50.2008.Suppl.6

Mouissie, A. M., Vos, P., Verhagen, H. M. C. & Bakker, J. P. (2005). Endozoochory by free-ranging, large herbivores: ecological correlates and perspectives for restoration. Basic. Appl. Ecol. 6: 547–558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.03.004

Tóth, E., Deák, B., Valkó, O., Kelemen, A., Miglécz, T., Tóthmérész, B. & Török, P. (2018): Livestock type is more crucial than grazing intensity: Traditional cattle and sheep grazing in shortgrass steppes. – Land Degrad. Dev. 29: 231–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2514

Török, P., Miglécz, T., Valkó, O., Kelemen, A., Deák, B., Lengyel, Sz. & Tóthmérész, B. (2012a): Recovery of native grass biodiversity by sowing on former croplands: Is weed suppression a feasible goal for grassland restoration? – J. Nat. Conserv. 20: 41–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2011.07.006

Török, P., Miglécz, T., Valkó, O., Kelemen, A., Tóth, K., Lengyel, Sz. & Tóthmérész, B. (2012b): Fast recovery of grassland vegetation by a combination of seed mixture sowing and low-diversity hay transfer. – Ecol. Eng. 44: 133–138. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.03.010

Török, P., Valkó, O., Deák, B., Kelemen, A., Tóth, E. & Tóthmérész, B. (2016): Managing for species composition or diversity? Pastoral and free grazing systems of alkali grasslands. – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 234: 23–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.010

Török, P., Valkó, O., Deák, B., Kelemen, A. & Tóthmérész, B. (2014): Traditional cattle grazing in a mosaic alkali landscape: Effects on grassland biodiversity along a moisture gradient. PLoS ONE 9: e97095. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097095

Vadász, C., Máté, A., Kun, R. & Vadász-Besnyői, V. (2016): Quantifying the diversifying potential of conservation management systems: An evidence-based conceptual model for managing speciesrich grasslands. – Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 234: 134–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.044

Valkó, O., Deák, B., Magura, T., Török, P., Kelemen, A., Tóth, K., Horváth, R., Nagy, D. D., Debnár, Zs., Zsigray, Gy., Kapocsi, I. & Tóthmérész, B. (2016a): Supporting biodiversity by prescribed burning in grasslands - a multi-taxa approach. – Sci. Total Environ. 572: 1377–1384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.184

Valkó, O., Deák, B., Török, P., Kirmer, A., Tischew, S., Kelemen, A., Tóth, K., Miglécz, T., Radócz, Sz., Sonkoly, J., Tóth, E., Kiss, R., Kapocsi, I. & Tóthmérész, B. (2016b): High-diversity sowing in establishment gaps: a promising new tool for enhancing grassland biodiversity. – Tuexenia 36: 359–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.14471/2016.36.020

Valkó, O., Deák, B., Török, P., Kelemen, A., Miglécz, T. & Tóthmérész, B. (2017): Filling up the gaps - Passive restoration does work on linear landscape scars. – Ecol. Eng. 102: 501–508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.024

Westoby, M. (1998): A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. – Plant Soil. 199: 213–227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004327224729

Published
2018-12-31