Land use, land use change and the ideal bee pasture in the perception of beekepers from Southern Transdanubia, Hungary

  • Ildikó Arany MTA Centre for Ecological Research; Szent István University, Environmental Sciences PhD School
  • Bálint Czúcz MTA Centre for Ecological Research; European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle
  • Imre Csonka Hungarian Beekeepers Association
  • Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki MTA Centre for Ecological Research
  • Zsolt Molnár MTA Centre for Ecological Research
Keywords: honeybee, pollination, invasive plant species, intensive agriculture, species richness, habitat diversity, local knowledge

Abstract

What makes a landscape ideal for bee pasture? What is the current situation compared to that, how could it be improved and what consequences would it involve concerning nature conservation? These are a few of our questions asked from 129 beekeepers during the Transdanubian Regional Beekepers’ Conference in 2015, in Kaposvár, Hungary. Beyond the crops and forests as main sources of profit, most beekeepers regarded the role of diverse habitats rich in wild flowers extremely important for the health of the bee colony. Beekeepers formulated several recommendations on how to improve bee pastures, such as restoration of semi-natural habitats, conscious sowing of melliferous plants and greening of agriculture. Besides their benefits for apiculture, some of the recommended measures are beneficial for nature conservation too, because they enhance species and habitat diversity not only for the benefit of honeybees but also for that of wild pollinators.

References

Bartomeus, I., Ascher, J. S., Wagner D., Danforth, B. N., Colla, S., Kornbluth, S. & Winfree R. (2011): Climate-associated phenological advances in bee pollinators and bee-pollinated plants. – P. Nat. Acad. Sci. 108: 20645–20649. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115559108

Bretagnolle, V. & Gaba, S. (2015): Weeds for bees? A review. – Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35: 891–909. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0302-5

Clough, Y., Ekroos, J., Báldi, A., Batáry, P., Bommarco, R., Gross, N., Holzschuh, A., Hopfenmüller, S., Knop, E., Kuussaari, M., Lindborg, R., Marini, L., Öckinger, E., Potts, S., Poyry, J., Roberts, S., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Smith H. (2014): Density of insect-pollinated grassland plants decreases with increasing surrounding land-use intensity. – Ecol. Lett. 17: 1168–1177. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12325

Czúcz, B., Molnár, Zs., Horváth, F. & Botta-Dukát, Z. (2008): The natural capital index of Hungary. – Acta Bot. Hung. 50(Suppl.): 161–177. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/ABot.50.2008.Suppl.8

Decourtye, A., Alaux, C., Odoux, J.-F., Henry, M., Vaissière, B. & Le Conte, Y. (2011): Why Enhancement of Floral Resources in Agro-Ecosystems Benefit Honeybees and Beekeepers? – In: Grillo, O. & Venora. G. (eds.): Ecosystems Biodiversity. – InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp. 371–389.

Dicks, L., Viana, B., Bommarco, R., Brosi, B., Arizmendi, M., Cunningham, S., Galetto, L., Hill, R., Lopes, A. V., Pires, C., Taki, H. & Potts, S. G. (2016): Ten policies for pollinators. – Science 354: 975–976. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aai9226

EC – European Commission DG Agriculture and Rural Development (2013): Evaluation of the CAP measures related to apiculture – Final Report. Framework Contract No. 30-CE-0219319/00-20, 170 p.

Kecskés, Cs. & Kulcsár, R. (2002): A méhészet Magyarországon 2000-ben. – Statisztikai Szemle 80: 9.

Kovács, M., Kránizt, L., Madarász, I., Magyari, R., Palakovics, Sz., Pethő, J., Rezneki, R., Szabó, E., Szerletics, Á., Sztahura, E., Tengerdi, G. & Zsemle, V. (2015): Zöldítés. Gazdálkodói kézikönyv. – Nemzeti Agrárgazdasági Kamara, 76 p.

Kovács-Hostyánszki, A., Espíndola, A., Vanbergen, A. J., Settele, J., Kremen, C. &, Dicks, L. V. (2017): Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination. – Ecol. Lett. 20: 673–689. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12762

Lehébel-Péron, A., Sidawy, P., Dounias, E. & Schatz, B. (2016): Attuning local and scientific knowledge in the context of global change: The case of heather honey production in southern France. – J. Rural Stud. 44: 132–142. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.005

Maderson, S. & Wynne-Jones, S. (2016): Beekeepers’ knowledges and participation in pollinator conservation policy – J. Rural Stud. 45: 88–98. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.015

Mihók, B., Kiss, G., Kovács, E., Margóczi, K., Fabók, V. & Kalóczkai Á. (2016): Ki mondja meg, mi a fontos? – Részvétel és természetvédelem. – Természetvédelmi Közlem. 22: 131–154. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20332/tvk-jnatconserv.2016.22.131

Molnár, Zs., Kovács-Hostyánszki, A., Sárospataki, M. & Báldi A. (2015): Gondolatok a hazai méhészet és a globális beporzó-felmérés közös céljairól. – Előadás, XVII. Dunántúli Regionális Méhésztalálkozó. Kaposvár és Térsége Méhészeinek Egyesülete és Kaposvári Egyetem, 2015. január 24.

Nagy, P. (2005): Hazánk és az Európai Unió méhészeti ágazatának piaci helyzete és kereskedelme az uniós csatlakozás fényében. – Diplomadolgozat, Budapesti Gazdasági Főiskola Külkereskedelmi Főiskolai Kar, Külgazdasági szak, 88 p.

Pinke, Gy. & Pál, R. (2009): Floristic composition and conservation value of the stubble-field weed community, dominated by Stachys annua in western Hungary. – Biologia 64: 279–291. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11756-009-0035-5

Potts, S. G., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V. L. & Ngo, H. T. (Eds.) (2016a): The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. – Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany, 827 p.

Potts, S. G., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V., Ngo, H. T., Aizen, M. A., Biesmeijer, J. C., Breeze, T. D., Dicks, L. V., Garibaldi, L. A., Hill, R., Settele, J. & Vanbergen, A. J. (2016b): Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. – Nature 540: 220–229. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature20588

Requier, F., Odoux, J. F., Tamic, T., Moreau, N., Henry, M., Decourtye, A. & Bretagnolle, V. (2015): Honey bee diet in intensive farmland habitats reveals an unexpectedly high ower richness and a major role of weeds. – Ecol. Appl. 25: 881–890. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/14-1011.1

Stoate, C., Báldi, A., Beja, P., Boatman, N. D., Herzon, I., van Doorn, A., de Snoo, G. R., Rakosy, L. & Ramwell, C. (2009): Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe – a review. – J. Environ. Manage. 91: 22–46. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005

Tóth, P. (2012): Magyar Méhészeti Nemzeti Program Környezetterhelési Monitoring vizsgálat 2011–2012. – Országos Magyar Méhészeti Egyesület, Veszprém, 48 p.

Vandenberg, A. J. & the Insect Pollinators Initiative (2013): Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinators. – Front. Ecol. Environ. 11: 251–259. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/120126

Vítková, M., Müllerová, J., Sádlo, J., Pergl, J. & Pyšek, P. (2017): Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) beloved and despised: A story of an invasive tree in Central Europe. – Forest Ecol. Manag. 384: 287–302. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.057

Zilahy E. (szerk.) (2012): A méhészet, méztermelés helyzete és lehetőségei, különös tekintettel Észak-Magyarország megyéire. – Központi Statisztikai Hivatal, Budapest, 15 p.

Published
2017-12-31
Section
Social Sciences in Conservation