Can we assess forest naturalness by ecological interpretation of forest floor vegetation?

  • Kata Kenderes Department of Plant Taxonomy & Ecology, Eötvös L. University
  • Tibor Standovár Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, Eötvös L. University
Keywords: beech forest, global optimalisation, naturalness, plant functional type, species trait, understorey vegetation

Abstract

We searched for a method that is appropriate for comparing the biological status of communities even with different species composition. For this purpose we compared the ecological behaviour of forest floor vegetation in forest stands under natural disturbances versus human impact, i.e. regular forest management. Herbaceous species of forests, forest edges and species with no clear habitat preference were classified based on seven characteristics: leaf phenology, life form, clonal behaviour, start of flowering, height, seed weight and means of propagule dispersal. Classification using global optimalisation, principal co-ordinate analysis and stepwise discriminant analyses were used. We distinguished 6 species groups: Geranium robertianum (A), Sonchus asper (B), Cephalanthera (C), Corydalis (D), Viola sylvestris (E), Stachys sylvatica (F). We studied the behaviour of these species groups in the unmanaged Kékes Forest Reserve and in the neighbouring managed stands. In the managed stands the average species richness per unit area was much lower than in the reserve, but the proportion of species belonging to species groups A, B, C and D was similar to that found in the unmanaged reserve. However, group F had higher relative importance in the reserve, since the more heterogeneous tree stand structure provides much better light supply, which favours tall, summer green species in the dense forest floor vegetation. We suggest that this approach could provide a more sensitive tool for assessing aspects o f forest naturalness if quantitative data expressing species’ importance were collected.

References

Borhidi, A. (1995): Social behaviour types, the naturalness and relative ecological indicator values of the higher plants in the Hungarian Flora. - Acta Bot. Hung. 39(1-2): 97-181.

Csontos, P. (2000): A magyar flóra ezermagsúly-adatbázisának bemutatása, alkalmazási példákkal. - Acta Biol. Debr. Oecol. Hung. 11(1): 51.

Csontos, P., Tamás, J. & Tobisch, T. (2002): A magyar flóra magterjesztési mód adatbázisának bemutatása, elemzési példákkal: a szociális magatartási típusok értékelése. - In: Salamon-Albert, É. (szerk.): Magyar botanikai kutatások az ezredfordulón — Tanulmányok Borhidi Attila 70. születésnapja tiszteletére . PTE Növénytani Tanszék és MTA Pécsi Akadémiai bizottság, Pécs, pp. 557-569.

Diaz, S., Cabido, M. & Casanoves, F. (1998): Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. - J. Vegetation Science 9(1): 113-122.

Epstein, H. E., Chapin, F. S., Walker, M. D. & Starfield, A. M. (2001): Analyzing the functional type concept in arctic plants using a dynamic vegetation model. - Oikos 95(2): 239-252.

Gitay, H. & Noble, I. R. (1997): What are the functional types and how should we seek them? - In: Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H. & Woodward, F. I. (eds): Plant functional types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3-19.

Givnish, T. J. (1982): On the adaptive significance of leaf height in forest herbs. - Amer. Naturalist 120(3): 353-381.

Graae, B. J. & Sunde, P. B. (2000): The impact of forest continuity and management on forest floor vegetation evaluated by species traits. - Ecography 23: 720-731.

Grime, J. P., Hodgson, J.G. & Hunt, R. (1988): Comparative plant ecology. A functional approach to common British species. - Unwin Hyman Ltd, London.

Grime, J. P., Thompson, K., Hunt, R., Hodgson, J. G., Comelissen, J. H. C., Rorison, I. H., Hendry, G. A. F., Ashenden, T. W., Askew, A. P., Band, S. R., Booth, R. E., Bossard, C. C., Campbell, B. D., Cooper, J. E. L., Davison, A. W., Gupta, P. L., Hall, W., Hand, D. W., Hannah, M. A., Hillier, S. H., Hodkinson, D. J., Jalili, A., Liu, Z., Mackey, J. M. L., Matthews, N., Mowforth, M. A., Neal, A. M., Reader, R. J., Reiling, K., RossFraser, W., Spencer, R. E., Sutton, F., Tasker, D. E., Thorpe, P. C. & Whitehouse, J. (1997): Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. - Oikos 79(2): 259-281.

Horváth, F., Dobolyi, Z. K., Morschhauser, T., Lőkös, L., Karas, L. & Szerdahelyi, T. (1995): FLÓRA adatbázis 1.2: Taxonlista és attribútum-állomány . - MTA ÖBKI, Vácrátót.

Klimes, L., Klimesova, J., Hendriks, R. & van Groenendael, J. (1997): Clonal plant architectures: a comparative analysis of form and function. - In: de Kroon, H. & van Groenendael, J. (eds): The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 1-29.

Kovács, M. (1968): Die Acerion pseudoplatani-wälder (Mercuriali-Tilietum und Phyllitidi-Aceretum) des Mátra-Gebirges. - Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 14(3-4): 331-350.

Kovács, M. (1975): Beziehung zwischen Vegetation und Boden. - Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

Lavorel, S., McIntyre, S., Landsberg, J. & Forbes, T. D. A. (1997): Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. - Trends Ecol. & Evol. 12(12): 474-478.

Lavorel, S., Touzard, B., Lebreton, J. D. & Clement, B. (1998): Identifying functional groups for response to disturbance in an abandoned pasture. - Acta Oecol., Intern. J. Ecol 19(3): 227-240.

Lavorel, S., Rochette, C. & Lebreton, J. D. (1999): Functional groups for response to disturbance in Mediterranean old fields. - Oikos 84(3): 480-498.

Leishman, M. R. & Westoby, M. (1992): Classifying plants into groups on the basis of associations of individual traits evidence from Australian semiarid woodlands. - J. Ecol. 80(3): 417-424.

Leishman, M. R., Westoby, M. & Jurado, E. (1995): Correlates of seed size variation: a comparison among five temperate floras. - J. Ecol. 83: 517-539.

Lindacher, R. (1995): Phanart. Datenbank der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas. - Veröff. geobot. Inst. Eidg. tech. Hochschule, Stiftung Rubel, Zürich, 125: 1-436.

Margóczi, K., Báldi, A., Dévai, Gy. & Horváth, F. (1997): A természetvédelmi ökológiai kutatási prioritásai. - Term. véd. Közlem. 5-6: 6-16.

Mucina, L. (1997): Classification of vegetation: Past, present and future. - J. Vegetation Sci. 8(6): 751-760.

Pászty, G. (1998): A Kékes Észak erdőrezervátum vegetációtérképe. - Szakdolgozat, ELTE Növényrendszertani és Ökológiai Tanszék, Budapest.

Podani, J. (1997): Bevezetés a többváltozós biológiai adatfeltárás rejtelmeibe. - Scientia Kiadó, Budapest.

Regehr, D. L. & Bazzaz, F. A. (1976): Low temperature photosynthesis in successional winter annuals. - Ecology 57: 1297-1303.

Rothmaler, W. (1988): Exkursionsflora Atlas der Gefässpflanzen. - Volk und Wissen Volkseigener Verlag, Berlin.

Shipley, B., Keddy, P. A., Moore, D. R. J. & Lemkt, K. (1989): Regeneration and establishment strategies of emergent macrophytes. - J. Ecol. 77: 1093-1110.

Simon, T. (1992): A magyarországi edényes flóra határozója: Harasztok-virágos növények. - Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.

Soó, R. (1964): A magyar flóra és vegetáció rendszertani-növényföldrajzi kézikönyve I-VII. - Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

Standovár, T. & Primack, R. B. (2001): A természetvédelmi biológia alapjai. - Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.

Székely, A. (1964): A Mátra természeti földrajza. - Földr. Közlem. 12(88): 199-218.

Thompson, K. & Rabinowitz, D. (1989): Do big plants have big seeds? - Amer. Naturalist 133: 722-728.

Thompson, K., Bakker, J. P., Bekker, R. M. & Hodgson, J. G. (1998): Ecological correlates of seed persistence in soil in the north-west European flora. - J. Ecol. 86: 163-169.

Vadas, J. (1898): Erdőműveléstan. - Országos Erdészeti Egyesület, Budapest.

Woodward, F. I. & Cramer, W. (1996): Plant functional types and climatic changes: Introduction. - J. Vegetation Sci. 7(3): 306-308.

Published
2004-12-31