Surrogate Motherhood – the European Legal Landscape
Abstract
Surrogate motherhood is a fascinating topic that has been part of human history since time immemorial and still provides kindling for discussion in the twenty-first century. Despite its ancient origin and current topicality, in many ways, surrogacy remains under-discussed. There is no clear consensus on how to deal with it: some important values will be jeopardized regardless of the route we take. Recent developments and research in the area of human reproductive medicine have resulted in a continuous increase in surrogacies each year, so it is paramount to consider the moral, ethical, and legal implications of the practice. This article examines the history of surrogacy laws, the enforceability of surrogacy agreements, and the current legal landscape of surrogacy in Europe.
References
Behm, L. (1999) ‘Legal, Moral & International Perspectives on Surrogate Motherhood: The Call for a Uniform Regulatory Scheme in the United States’, DePaul Journal of Health Care Law, 2(3), pp. 557–603.
Brodeala, E. (2016) ‘The Legal Status of Assisted Human Reproduction in Romania. A Brief Discussion on Surrogacy’, Romanian Journal of Comparative Law, 2016/1, pp. 56–74.
Davaki, K. (2017) ‘Surrogacy arrangements in austerity Greece: policy considerations in a permissive regime’ in Davies, M. (ed.) Babies for Sale? Transnational Surrogacy, Human Rights and the Politics of Reproduction. London: Zed Books; https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350218567.ch-008
Davletshina, L., Karmanov, M. (2020) ‘Surrogate Motherhood as an Object of Statistical Research’, Vestnik Universiteta, 2020/7, pp. 176–183; https://doi.org/10.26425/1816–4277-2020-7-176-183
De Sutter, P. (2016) Children’s rights related to surrogacy [Online]. Available at: http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-DocDetails-EN.asp?fileid=23015&lang=2 [Accessed: 31 August 2021].
Dunson, D., Baird, D., Colombo, B. (2004) ‘Increased Infertility with Age in Men and Women’, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103(1), pp. 51–56; https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000100153.24061.45
Erdősová, A. (2014) ‘Náhradné materstvo právne a eticky, alebo nakoľko platí: mater semper certa est, pater incertus’, Justičná revue, 66(12),
Erdősová, A. (2016) Aktuálne otázky o človeku a jeho právach v bioetike. Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer.
Ferreira, N., Almeida, S. (2020) Portuguese report on immoral contracts. Cambridge: Intersentia [Online]. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/hs3nb.html (Accessed: 10 January 2022); https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hs3nb
Haderka, J. (1986) ‘Surogační mateřství’, Právny obzor, 69(10), pp. 924 ff.
Hatzis, A. (2010) The Regulation of Surrogate Motherhood in Greece [Online]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1689774 (Accessed: 10 January 2022); https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1689774
Jędrejek G. (2014) Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Júdová, E., Píry, M. (2019) ‘Surrogacy motherhood in the Slovak Republic – an illegal immigrant?’ in Mostowik, P. (ed.) Fundamental legal problems of surrogate motherhood: Global perspective. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości.
Karpat, A. (2018) ‘Zákaz diskriminácie pracovníkov v judikatúre Súdneho dvora EÚ’ in Voľný pohyb osôb a vnútorný trh Európskej únie. Bratislava: Euroiuris.
Lasker, S.P. (2016). ‘Surrogacy’ in ten Have, H. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_409-1
Maganto Pavón, E. (2003) ‘Enrique IV de Castilla (1454–1474). Un singular enfermo urológico. Una endocrinopatía causa de los problemas uro-andrológicos del monarca. Infertilidad o esterilidad. Intentos de inseminación artificial (IV)’, Archivos Españoles de Urología, 56(3), pp. 233–241.
Mostowik, P. (2017) ‘Legislative activities of European Union versus fundamental principles of paternity and maternity in Member States’, International Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family, Vol. 8, pp. 79–94 [Online]. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3224049.
Mostowik, P. (2019) Fundamental legal problems of surrogate motherhood: Global perspective. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości.
Ombelet, W., Robays, J. (2015) ‘Artificial insemination history: hurdles and milestones’, Facts Views Vis Obgyn, 7(2), pp. 137-143.
Patel, N., Jadeja, Y., (2018) ‘Insight into Different Aspects of Surrogacy Practices’, Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 11(3), pp. 212–218; https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_138_17
Posner, R. (1989) ‘The Ethics and Economics of Enforcing Contracts of Surrogate Motherhood’, Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 5(1), pp. 21–31 [Online]. Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/jchlp/vol5/iss1/5
Raposo V. L. (2017) ‘The new Portuguese law on surrogacy – The story of how a promising law does not really regulate surrogacy arrangements’, JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 21(3), pp. 230–239; https://doi.org/10.5935/1518–0557.20170044
Sartin, J. (2004) ‘J. Marion Sims, the Father of Gynecology: Hero or Villain?’ Southern Medical Journal, 97(5), 500–505; https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611
Skidmore, M., Anderson, G., Eiswerth, M. (2012) ‘The Child Adoption Marketplace’, Public Finance Review, 44(2), pp. 163–196; https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142114547412
Solinger, R. (2000) Wake Up Little Susie: Single Pregnancy and Race Before Roe v. Wade. Oxfordshire: Routledge; https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203950685
Steptoe, P.C., Edwards, R. G. (1978) ‘Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo’, Lancet, 312(8085); https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140–6736(78)92957-4
Tesinova, J., Ždarek, R., Policar, R. (2011) Medicínske právo. Praha: C. H. Beck.
