Freedom of Conscience and COVID-19 Vaccination
Reconciling Contradictory Forces
Abstract
Compulsory COVID vaccination is a timely question to ask as more and more countries introduce it. There is a growing body of case law and literature on child vaccination against a number of well-known diseases,[1] yet the current issue involving the compulsory vaccination of adults against COVID-19 presents a new case. I hypothesise as follows: (a) compulsory vaccination is constitutional, under certain conditions; (b) alternative behaviour must be tolerated if it produces the same end. I verify these hypotheses by analysing the role of conscience in vaccinations in general and in COVID-19 vaccination in particular. I consider the Hungarian context, but the conclusions might apply to other countries as well. The key issue is the extent to which the government should respect individual conscience during a pandemic. I first discuss what conscience is in legal terms. Second, I discuss the legal nature and background of COVID-19 vaccination. Third, I describe the decision of the Hungarian Constitutional Court on mandatory vaccination and compare the current situation with the previous one. Fourth, I analyse the outcome of the ‘comparative test of burdens’. Finally, I summarise my conclusions.
References
Dávid, L. (2011) ‘A Legfelsőbb Bíróság döntése az életkorhoz kötött kötelező védőoltások beadatásának megtagadásáról’ [‘The Supreme Court Decision on Refusing Mandatory Child Vaccination’] Jogesetek Magyarázata 2011/3.
Domingo, R. (2015) ‘Restoring Freedom of Conscience’, Journal of Law and Religion, 30(2), pp. 176-193 doi:10.1017/jlr.2015.5
Farber, A. D. (2020) ‘The Long Shadow of Jacobson v. Massachusetts: Epidemics, Fundamental Rights, and the Courts’, San Diego Law Review, 57 (pp. 833-864) .
Goldner Lang, I. (2021) ‘Vaccination for Vacation: Should the EU Have a “Digital Green Pass”, “Vaccination Certificate” or Better Nothing?’ Verfassungsblog. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/vaccination-for-vacation/ (Accessed: 5 December 2021) doi:10.17176/20210316–154013-0
Gostin, O. L., Salmon, A. D., Larson, J. H. (2021) ‘Mandating Covid-19 Vaccines’, JAMA. 2021;325(6):532-533. doi:10.1001/2020.26553
Harrison, E. A., Wu, J. W. (2020) ‘Vaccine Confidence in the Time of Covid-19’, European Journal of Epidemiology, 35, pp. 325-330. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00634-3
Killmond, M. (2017) ‘Why Is Vaccination Different? A Comparative Analysis of Religious Exemptions’, Columbia Law Review, 117(4), pp. 913-952.
Kuminetz, G. (2009) ‘A lelkiismeret mivolta és rendeltetése katolikus szemmel’ [‘Conscience and Its Purpose from a Catholic Perspective’], Iustum Aequum Salutare, 2009/3, pp. 19-56.
Opel, D.J., Diekema, D.S., Friedman Ross, L. (2020) ‘Should We Mandate Covid-19 Vaccine for Children?’ JAMA, 175(2), pp. 125-126. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.319.
Pelčić, G., Karačić, S., Mikirtichan, G. L., Kubar, I.O., Leavitt, F. J., Cheng-tek Tai, M., Morishita, N., Vuletić, S., Tomašević, L. (2016) ‘Religious Exception for Vaccination or Religious Excuses for Avoiding Vaccination’, Croatian Medical Journal, 5, pp. 516-521.
Szendrői, A. (2020) ‘Egy szúrás az egész?! Az életkorhoz kötött kötelező védőoltásokat övező személyiségi jogi kollíziók’ [‘Just One Twitch?! Privacy Issues concerning AgeBased Vaccination’], Miskolci Jogi Szemle, 2, pp. 186-199.
Tanner, R., Flood, C. M. (2021) ‘Vaccine Passports Done Equitably’, JAMA, 2(4), doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0972.
Torfs, R. (2016) ‘The Presence of the Cross in Public Spaces from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Stanisz, P., Zawiślak, M., Ordon, M. (eds.) Presence of the Cross in Public Spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Vaz, O. M., Ellingson, M. K., Weiss, P., Jenness, S. M., Bardají, A., Bednarczyk, R. A., Omer, S. B. (2020) ‘Mandatory Vaccination in Europe’, Pediatrics, 145(2), e20190620. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019–0620.
Wilf-Miron, R., Myers, V., Saban, M. (2021) ‘Incentivizng Vaccination Uptake: The “Green Pas” Proposal in Israel’, JAMA, 325(15), pp. 1503–1504. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama2021.4300.
Case law
Hungary
Supreme Court of Hungary Bfv.II.25/2009/5. BH2020.147.
Constitutional Court
/2007 (VI. 20.) CC decision
/2020 (III. 2.) CC decision
US
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)
