Some Remarks on the CJEU’s ‘Pancharevo’ Decision With Special Regard to the Nexus Between the Primacy of EU Law and the National Identity of Member States’

  • György Marinkás Senior Researcher, Ferenc Mádl Institute of Comparative Law, Hungary; Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Miskolc, Hungary
Keywords: same-sex marriage, adoption, primacy of EU law, functional recognition, principle of effectiveness, national identity

Abstract

This paper analyses same-sex marriage and adoption and the nexus between the primacy of EU law and national identity of the Member States in the light of the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Pancharevo-case delivered in December 2021. The CJEU ruled that the Bulgarian authorities were obliged to issue a child’s birth certificate, which is a condition for the issuance of an identity document or passport under Bulgarian national law. A Member State may not rely on national law and identity in this respect. The CJEU relied on the principle of ‘ functional recognition’, which same-sex marriageit had first adopted in its judgment in the Coman-case.

References

Andrzejewski, M. (2021) ‘Legal Protection of the Family: Essential Polish Provisions Regarding International Legal Standards and Social Change’ in Barzó, T., Lenkovics, B. (eds.) Family Protection From a Legal Perspective. Budapest–Miskolc: Ferenc Mádl Institute of Comparative Law – Central European Academic Publishing, pp. 151–190; https://doi.org/10.54237/profnet.2021.tbblfl_5.

Associated Press (2019) Bulgaria court recognizes gay marriage in landmark case [Online]. Available at: https://apnews.com/article/c575e7c8cd4d470c87d64a0b76820433 (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Benyusz, M. (2021) ‘A gyermekek jövője az Európai Unióban – Mit ígér a Bizottság 2021-2024-es stratégiája?’, Jog – Állam – Politika, 13(3), pp. 149–162.

Barzó, T. (2021) ‘Family Protection in Central European Countries’ in Barzó, T., Lenkovics, B. (eds.) Family Protection From a Legal Perspective. Budapest–Miskolc: Ferenc Mádl Institute of Comparative Law – Central European Academic Publishing, pp. 287–322; https://doi.org/10.54237/profnet.2021.tbblfl_9.

de Groot, D. (2021) EU law and the mutual recognition of parenthood between Member States: the case of V.M.A. v Stolichna obshtina. European University Institute [Online]. Available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/69731 (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Den Haese, S. (2021) Cross-Border Portability of Personal Status: Human Rights to the Rescue? Human Rights in Context [Online]. Available at: https://www.humanrightsincontext.be/post/cross-border-portability-of-personal-statushuman-rights-to-the-rescue (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Drinóczi, T. (2018) ‘A tagállami identitás védelme’ in Jakab, A., Fekete, B. (eds.) Internetes Jogtudományi Enciklopédia [Online]. Available at: http://real.mtak.hu/83280/1/a_tagallami_identitas_vedelme_u.pdf (Accessed: 26 March 2023).

Ellena, S. (2022) EU countries split over Commission’s plan to give parents cross-border rights. EURACTIV.com [Online]. Available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/nondiscrimination/news/eu-countries-split-over-commissions-plan-to-give-parentscross-border-rights/ (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

EAPIL Editorial (2022) Functional Recognition of Same-sex Parenthood for the Benefit of Mobile Union Citizens – Brief Comments on the CJEU’s Pancharevo Judgment. By the editors of the EAPIL Blog, 3 February 2022 [Online]. Available at: https://eapil.org/2022/02/03/functional-recognition-of-same-sex-parenthood-for-the-benefitof-mobile-union-citizens-brief-comments-on-the-cjeus-pancharevo-judgment/ (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

French Ministry of the Interior (2022) Informal Ministerial Meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs Council configuration, (Lille, 3-4 February 2022) – Press kit, p. 13 [Online]. Available at: https://presidence-francaise.consilium.europa.eu/media/r4fjcclf/jailille_dossier-de-presse-ang.pdf (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Gellérné Lukács, É. (2020) ‘Az egyenlő bánásmód, a nem diszkriminatív akadályok és az intézményesített jogvédelem fejlődése a személyek szabad mozgása területén’, Állam- és jogtudomány, 61(3), pp. 61–73.

Grünberger, M. (2010) ‘Die Gleichbehandlung von Ehe und eingetragener Lebenspartnerschaft im Zusammenspiel von Unionsrecht und nationalem Verfassungsrecht’, Familie Partnerschaft Recht, 16(5), pp. 203–208.

Gyeney, L. (2018) ‘Same Sex Couples’ Right to Free Movement in Light of Member States National Identities. The legal analysis of the Coman case’, Iustum Aequum Salutare, 14(2), pp. 149–171.

Kruger, T. (2020) Same-sex parentage and surrogacy and their practical implications in Poland. Conflictoflaws.net [Online]. Available at: https://conflictoflaws.net/2020/same-sex-parentage-and-surrogacy-and-their-practical-implications-in-poland/ (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Library of Congress (2018) Germany: Federal Court of Justice Rules Same-Sex Marriage Does Not Make Wife of Child’s Mother Co-parent by Law [Online]. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2018-11-09/germany-federal-court-ofjustice-rules-same-sex-marriage-does-not-make-wife-of-childs-mother-coparent-by-law/ (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Marinkás, Gy. (2021) ‘Ultra Vires avagy sem? Az EKB által alkalmazott válságkezelési eszközök és azok konformitása az uniós joggal, különös tekintettel az EUB és a Német Szövetségi Alkotmánybíróság közötti évtizedes hatásköri vitára’, Miskolci Jogi Szemle, 16(5), pp. 328–329; https://doi.org/10.32980/MJSz.2021.5.1476.

Office of Communication and Promotion of the Polish Ministry of Justice (2021) Veto on plans to legalise adoption by same-sex couples and same-sex marriages (08.10.2021) [Online]. Available at: https://www.gov.pl/web/justice/veto-on-plansto-legalise-adoption-by-same-sex-couples-and-same-sex-marriages (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Pfeiff, S. (2017) La portabilité du statut personnel dans l’espace européen. Bruxelles: Bruylant Publishing.

Schmidt, V. A. (2016) ‘Reinterpreting the rules ‘by stealth’ in times of crisis: a discursive institutionalist analysis of the European Central Bank and the European Commission’, West European Politics, 39(5), pp. 1–21; https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1186389.

Sowry, B. (2022) EU-wide recognition of surrogacy and same-sex parenthood proposed [Online]. Available at: https://www.progress.org.uk/eu-wide-recognition-ofsurrogacy-and-same-sex-parenthood-proposed/ (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Weiler, J., Haltern, U., Mayer, F. (1995) ‘European Democracy and Its Critique. Five Uneasy Pieces’, European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre, EUI Working Paper, RSC No. 95/11 [Online]. Available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/1386/95_11.pdf (Accessed: 26 March 2023).

Wysocka-Bar, A. (2020) Legal Status of a Child Born Through Surrogacy – Latest From Poland. The Blog of the European Association of Private International Law [Online]. Available at: https://eapil.org/2020/12/16/polish-court-asks-the-cjeu-to-rule-onthe-status-of-children-born-to-same-sex-couples/ (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Answer given by Ms Dalli on behalf of the European Commission on 1.3.2022 to Parliamentary question E-005164/2021 (17.11.2021) [Online]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-005164-ASW_EN.html (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Chart of signatures and ratifications of Treaty 214 (Status as of 29/01/2023) [Online]. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=signaturesby-treaty&treatynum=214 (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Civil unions and registered partnerships [Online]. Available at: https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/family/couple/registered-partners/index_en.htm (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Court of Justice of the European Union (Press Release No. 221/21) Judgment in Case C-490/20 Stolichna obshtina, rayon ‘Pancharevo’ [Online]. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2021-12/cp210221en.pdf (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Deutscher Bundestag, Ausschuss für Arbeit und Sozialordnung des Bundestages (BTDrucksache 7/4845).

Deutscher Bundestag, Gesetzentwurf (19. Wahlperiode) 12.06.2018 (Drucksache 19/2665).

ECHR, Press Release (132/2019), 10.04.2019 [Online]. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=003-6380685-8364782&filename=Advisory+opinion+P16-2018-001+.pdf (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

European Commission, Equality package: Commission proposes new rules for the recognition of parenthood between Member States. Press Release, 7 December 2022, Brussels (IP/22/7509) [Online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_7509 (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

European Commission, Initiative on the recognition of parenthood between Member States Factual summary of the Open Public Consultation. Brussels, October 2021 (No. 6847413) [Online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12878-Cross-border-family-situations-recognition-ofparenthood_en (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

European Commission: Proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition of decisions and acceptance of authentic instruments in matters of parenthood and on the creation of a European Certificate of Parenthood. Brussels, 7.12.2022 (COM (2022) 695 final) [Online]. Available at: https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2022-12/com_2022_695_1_en_act_part1.pdf (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

European Commission: Union of Equality: LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025. Brussels, 12.11.2020 (COM (2020) 698 final) [Online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0698 (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

European Parliament (2019-2024) Verbatim Report of Proceedings (15.03.2023.), p. 213 [Online]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2023-03-15_HU.pdf (Accessed: 26 March 2023).

European Parliament, 2022/0402(CNS) [Online]. Available at: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?reference=2022/0402(CNS)&l=en (Accessed: 26 March 2023).

Minutes: 7th Meeting of the Expert Group on the recognition of parenthood between Member States 22 February 2022 (via VTC) [Online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?lang=en&do=groupDetail.groupDetail&groupID=3765 (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Parlamento italiano, risoluzione della 4ª commissione permanente (politiche dell’unione europea) doc. xviii-bis n. 2 [Online]. Available at: https://secure.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/document/COM-2022-0695/itsen (Accessed: 26 March 2023).

Parlement français, N° 84 sénat session ordinaire de 2022-2023 (22 mars 2023) [Online]. Available at: https://secure.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/document/COM-2022-695/frsen (Accessed: 26 March 2023).

Parliamentary question (No. E-005164/2021) [Online]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-005164_EN.html (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Procedure 2022/0402/CNS [Online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/procedure/EN/2022_402 (Accessed: 21 March 2023).

Regulation on the recognition of parenthood between Member States. In “A New Push for European Democracy” (As of 20/02/2023) [Online]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/spotlight-JD22/file-recognition-ofparenthood-between-member-states?sid=6701 (Accessed: 21 March 2023).

State of the Union Address by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary (16 September 2020) [Online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/hu/SPEECH_20_1655 (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Status Table of Convention of 14 March 1978 on Celebration and Recognition of the Validity of Marriages Entry into force: 1.5.1991 [Online]. Available at: https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=88 (Accessed: 5 February 2023).

Vragen over voorstel voor een verordening betreffende wederzijdse erkenning van afstamming (COM(2022)695) 24 maart 2023 (172946.01U) [Online]. Available: https://secure.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/document/COM-2022-695/nleer (Accessed: 25 March 2023).

Published
2023-06-28
How to Cite
MarinkásG. (2023). Some Remarks on the CJEU’s ‘Pancharevo’ Decision With Special Regard to the Nexus Between the Primacy of EU Law and the National Identity of Member States’ . Law, Identity and Values, 3(1), 177-201. https://doi.org/10.55073/2023.1.177-201
Section
Articles