Irregular Migration in Poland and the Importance of Readmission Agreements in Theory and Practice

Keywords: irregular migration, refugee status and subsidiary protection, asylum and temporary protection, readmission, residence permit for humanitarian reasons, residence permit for tolerated stay

Abstract

Poland is a Member State of the European Union and a part of the Schengen area, which ensures free movement without controls at its internal borders while strengthening the security of its external borders. It plays a special role here, as its eastern border is simultaneously its external border. This importance has been further increased by recent events in the eastern part of Europe, particularly through the smuggling of migrants and refugees into the European Union from, inter alia, Iraq, Afghanistan, and other countries in the Middle East and Africa via the Belarusian-Lithuanian, Belarusian-Polish, and Belarusian-Latvian borders in 2021, and because of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine on 24 February 2022 resulting in millions of people fleeing war and seeking protection, particularly in the eastern part of the European Union. The increased migratory movement along the eastern borders of the Republic of Poland observed in 2021, was a direct cause of the changes introduced in Polish legislation on foreigners. The possibility of returning migrants apprehended immediately after crossing the border in violation of the law was introduced. In such cases, the competent commanding officer of the Border Guard could draw up a report on crossing the border and issue an order to leave Poland. The appeal against this order may be presented to the Commander-in-Chief of the Border Guard, which, however, does not suspend it. The aim of these provisions was to protect the border from a mass influx of irregular migrants. However, it is questionable whether they simultaneously ensure the fundamental human right to be treated with dignity.

References

Chlebny, J. (2006) ‘Ustalanie okoliczności faktycznych w sprawie o udzielenie cudzoziemcowi ochrony’, Zeszyty Naukowe Sądownictwa Administracyjnego, 2006/5, pp. 52–63.

Chlebny, J. (2010) ‘Dowód z przesłuchania strony w postępowaniu o nadanie statusu uchodźcy’, Zeszyty Naukowe Sądownictwa Administracyjnego, 2010/5-6, pp. 42–58.

Chlebny, J. (2013) ‘Ochrona tymczasowa przed wydaleniem cudzoziemca’, Zeszyty Naukowe Sądownictwa Administracyjnego, 2013/6, pp. 21–40.

Chlebny, J. (2021) ‘Postępowanie w sprawie udzielenia cudzoziemcom ochrony’ in Matan, A., Łaszczyca, G. (eds.) System Prawa Administracyjnego Procesowego. Tom IV. Postępowania autonomiczne i szczególne. Postępowania niejurysdykcyjne. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, pp. 601–610.

Council of Europe (2021) ‘Poland’s border with Belarus: Commissioner calls for immediate access of international and national human rights actors and media’, Council of Europe Newsletter on migration and refugees, November 2021 [Online]. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/special-representativesecretary-general-migration-refugees/newsletter-november-2021 (Accessed: 20 October 2023).

European Migration Network (2014) Entry bans and readmission. Poland’s entry bans policy and use of readmission agreements. Report produced by the National Contact Point to the European Migration Network in Poland. Warsaw: Ministry of the Interior – Migration Policy Department.

European Migration Network (2021) EMN Annual Report on Migration and Asylum. Part 2, Poland 2021. Warsaw: Ministry of the Interior – Migration Policy Department.

European Migration Network (2022) Raport Roczny ESM dot. migracji i azylu, część 2, Polska 2021 r. Warsaw: Ministry of the Interior – Migration Policy Department.

Goodwin-Gill, G. S., McAdam, J., Dunlop, E. (2021) The Refugee in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; https://doi.10.1093/law/9780199207633.001.0001.

Grześkowiak, M. (2023) ‘Od aktywizmu do “polityki przyzwolenia”. Komisja Europejska wobec nieregularnej migracji w latach 2015–2021 ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem kryzysu humanitarnego na granicy polsko-białoruskiej’, Państwo i Prawo, 2023/3, pp. 21–47.

Karageorgiou, E., Noll, G. (2022) ‘What Is Wrong with Solidarity in EU Asylum and Migration Law?’, Jus Cogens, 4(2), pp. 131–154; https://doi.10.1007/s42439-022-00059-4.

Kosińska, A. M. (2019) ‘Case of Bistieva and others v. Poland’, Polish Review of International and European Law, 8(2), pp. 129–139; https://doi.org/10.21697/priel.2019.8.2.06.

Kosińska, A. M. (2021) ‘Legal Responses in the Area of Migration Security after 2015 Migration Crisis in Italy, Germany and Poland. Whose Security Does National Law Protect: Migrants or Citizens?’, Journal of Human Security, 17(1), pp. 66–79; https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2021.17010066.

Kowalski, M. (2016) ‘Konflikt na Ukrainie a praktyka udzielania ochrony cudzoziemcom na terytorium Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej’ in Pudzianowska, D. (eds.) Status cudzoziemca w Polsce wobec współczesnych wyzwań międzynarodowych. 1st edn. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, pp. 96–116.

Kumela-Romańska, M. (2022) Ustawa o cudzoziemcach. Komentarz, wyd. II. Wolters Kluwer.

Lauterpacht, E., Bethlehem, D. (2003) ‘The Scope and Content of the Principle of Non-Refoulement: Opinion’ in Feller, E., Türk, V., Nicholson, F. (eds.) Refugee Protection in International Law. UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–177; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493973.008.

Łubiński, P. (2002) ‘Hybrid Warfare or Hybrid Threat – The Weaponization of Migration as an Example of the Use of Lawfare – Case Study of Poland’, Polish Political Science Yearbook, 51(1), pp. 43–55; https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202209.

Menéndez, A. J. (2016) ‘The Refugee Crisis: Between Human Tragedy and Symptom of the Structural Crisis of European Integration’, European Law Journal, 22(4), pp. 388–416; https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12192.

Mikołajczyk, B. (2008) ‘Nowa forma ochrony udzielanej cudzoziemcom’, Państwo i Prawo, 2008/10, pp. 34–45.

Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (2021) ‘Opinion of the Ombudsman to the Senate on the amendment of the Law on foreigners’ Biuletyn Informacji Publicznej RPO, 5 October [Online]. Available at: https://bip.brpo.gov.pl/pl/content/rpocudzoziemcy-wydalanie-opinia-senat (Accessed: 14 May 2023).

Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (2023) ‘Opinion of the Polish Ombudsman to the European Court of Human Rights’, Biuletyn Informacji Publicznej RPO, 27 June [Online]. Available at: https://bip.brpo.gov.pl/pl/content/rpo-migrancipushbacki-etpc-opinia (Accessed: 15 October 2023).

Rogala, R. (2021) ‘Prawo cudzoziemca do ubiegania się na granicy o udzielenie ochrony międzynarodowej’, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy, 2021/11, pp. 11–23.

Safjan, M., Bosek, L. (eds.) (2016) Konstytucja RP. Tom I. Warszawa: C.H.Beck.

Spencer, S., Triandafyllidou, A. (2022) ‘Irregular Migration’ in Scholten, P. (eds.) Introduction to Migration Studies. An Interactive Guide to the Literatures on Migration and Diversity. Cham: Springer, pp. 191–207; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92377-8_12.

Zdanowicz, M. (2011) ‘Readmisja w relacjach Polski i Rosji’, Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2011/9, pp. 131–141; https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2011.09.06.

Zdanowicz, M. (2023) ‘The Migration Crisis on the Polish-Belarusian Border’, Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(1), pp. 103–115; https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2023.28.01.06.

Published
2023-12-28
How to Cite
RyszkaJ. (2023). Irregular Migration in Poland and the Importance of Readmission Agreements in Theory and Practice. Law, Identity and Values, 3(2), 239-263. https://doi.org/10.55073/2023.2.239-263
Section
Articles