Lessons Learned From Askos Properties Eood Judgement
Force majeure, exceptional circumstances, definition of expropriation of agricultural holding in the scope of EAFRD
Abstract
The main proceedings concern a farmer in Bulgaria who, under a rural development programme, undertook to maintain the lands leased through agreements concluded for five years with the municipality in good agricultural and environmental condition and engage in agricultural activities in those areas. After the amendment of national legislation, meadows or grasslands owned by municipalities or the state were to be leased exclusively to owners or users of farms with herbivorous animals based on the number and type of their declared livestock. Since the concerned party of the main proceedings failed to meet these requirements after the amendment, the municipality terminated the agreements in question. The paying agency of the member state claimed reimbursement of 50% of the amount already paid under the rural development programme. In contrast, the concerned party of the main proceedings considered that the amendment to the national legislation constituted force majeure, exceptional circumstances or expropriation of agricultural holding. The present study examines the CJEU’s decision on this matter.
References
Bianchi, D. (2012) La politique agricole commune (PAC). Bruxelles: Bruylant.
Bouveresse, A. (2010) Le pouvoir discrétionnaire dans l’ordre juridique communautaire. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
Korom, Á. (2021a) Tagállami végrehajtási hatáskörök gyakorlása a KAP alkalmazási körében: a magyar gyakorlat tükrében [Exercising the Member States’ implementing power in the scope of CAP: in the light of Hungarian practice], in Peres, Zs. and Bathó, G. (eds), Ünnepi tanulmányok a 80 éves Máthé Gábor tiszteletére: Labor est etiam ipse voluptas [Festive studies in honour of the 80-year-old Gábor Máthé: Labor est etiam ipse voluptas]. Budapest: Ludovika Egyetemi Kiadó.
Korom, Á. (2021b) Példák az uniós jog általános elveinek mellőzésére a Közös Agrárpolitika alkalmazási körében – Szükségesek-e ezen eltérések a Közös Agrárpolitika működőképességének fenntartásáért? [Examples of disregard of general principles of EU law in the application of the Common Agricultural Policy – Are these derogations necessary to maintain the viability of the Common Agricultural Policy?], in Peres, Zs. and Pál, G. (eds), Ünnepi tanulmányok a 80 éves Tamás András tiszteletére: Semper ad perfectum [Festive studies in honour of the 80-year-old Tamás András: Semper ad perfectum]. Budapest: Ludovika Egyetemi Kiadó.
Korom, Á. (2021c) Evaluation of Member State Provisions Addressing Land Policy and Restitution by the European Commission. Central European Journal of Comparative Law, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.47078/2021.2.101-125
Korom, Á. (2023) How the KOB SIA case altered the Member States’ margin of appreciation: with particular attention to the judgment’s possibly consistent characteristics and the relevant provisions of Directive 123/2006. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Law, 18(35). https://doi.org/10.21029/ JAEL.2023.35.86
Szinek Csütörtöki, Hajnalka (2023) Agricultural land succession rules in the Visegrád countries and the relevant case law of national constitutional courts. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Law, Vol. XVIII, No. 35, pp. 128–144. ISSN 1788-6171. https://doi.org/10.21029/JAEL.2023.35.128
Ujhelyi-Gyurán, Ildikó – Lele, Zsófia – Pártay-Czap, Sarolta (2024) Locus standi in administrative proceedings concerning environment protection, in the case law of the CJEU and the ECtHR. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Law, Vol. XIX, No. 36, pp. 203–224. ISSN 1788-6171. https://doi.org/10.21029/ JAEL.2024.36.203
