Thoughts on the principle of ne bis in idem in the light of administrative and criminal sanctions for the legal protection of animals
Abstract
According to the well-developed interpretation of the principle of the ne bis in idem in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights, the same conduct cannot be the subject of two proceedings or santions with similar functions and purposes. In Hungary the Constitutional Court has interpreted the rules of the ne bis in idem in administrative and criminal procedure for animal welfare fine and sanctions for cruelty to animals in Decision 8/2017. (IV.18) AB and the legislator settled its rules in Act on administrative sanctions which came into effect from the 1st of January, 2021. The recent study through practical issues approaches how principle prevails, its problems and possible solutions in the field of unlawful conduct in animal welfare, in particular regarding the role of the prosecutor.
References
2. Bizjak D (2015) The protection of the environment through criminal law in Croatia, PhD Thesis, Central European University, Budapest
3. Commission working document on a Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2006-2010 (2006) Strategic basis for the proposed actions, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52006DC0014 [30.10.2021]
4. Harmati J & Kiss Á L (2016) Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights on the prohibition of double assessment Judgment of the joint application of tax fines and criminal convictions, JeMa, 2016/4.
5. Kajó C (2021) A cornerstone from a keystone - the ultimate The elimination of the ultima ratio principle in cruelty to animals offense (with a view to the emerging “forum shopping” due to tendencies in sanctioning, https://www.jogiforum.hu/publikaciok/1138 [30.10.2021]
6. Lengyel T (2020) The practical barriers regarding the principle of ne bis in idem in terms of criminal and adminsitrative law in Hungary, Belügyi Szemle, 2020/5.