The COVID Crisis as a Sample Tube with Contemporary Legal Phenomena
A superficial view of lawmakers’ reaction to the current pandemic crisis is that we are witnessing an aberration and a concentration of bad practices. This paper presents a partially opposite thesis that the response of legal systems to this situation is not surprising and an accumulation of several phenomena very characteristic of the contemporary evolution of law. The restriction of personal freedoms, often imposed by means far from the theoretical scope of sources of law described by demo-liberal constitutions, combined with the broad scope and curious details of the extraordinary regulations complete the general trend towards the juridisation of almost every aspect of human activities. Today, the law serves as the dominant tool of creating social and economic order, taking the fields once occupied by other (and now almost extinct) normative systems and at the same time, displacing them. Thus, the more law exists in the everyday circulation, the more demand it creates for further and even more casuistic legal regulation. In this reality, this is the only tool that can be applied in extraordinary circumstances. In addition, the applied legislative techniques are not new. The Polish act known commonly and semi-officially as the ‘anti-crisis shield’ is a typical ‘complex act’ aimed at dealing with a particular matter thoroughly through the use of all traditional methods of regulation: civilian, administrative, and penal mixed together in a single text of law. Thus, this regulation also constitutes a perfect (and perhaps the most striking) example of the phenomenon of decodification, especially in the field of private law, since it deals with particular contractual and tort issues as if there were no relevant regulations in the Civil Code, which should (at least theoretically) constitute the core of the private law system.
Alderman R., et al. (COVID-19 - Consumer Law Research Group) (2020), 'Consumer Law and Policy Relating to Change of Circumstances Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic', Journal of Consumer Policy 43, pp. 437-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-020-09463-z
An Act to make provision in connection with coronavirus; and for connected purposes (Coronavirus Act).
Blichner, L.C., Molander, A. (2005) What is juridification?, Working Paper No.14, March 2005 [Online]. Available at: www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/…/arena…/ wp05_14.pdf (Accessed: 30 October 2020).
Bottoms, A., Tankebe, J. (2012) 'Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice', The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 102(1), pp. 119-170. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701996.003.0001
Coxe, A.C. (1906) 'Overproduction of Law', Columbia Law Review 6(2), pp. 102.
Deflem, M. (2013) 'The Legal Theory of Jürgen Habermas' in Banakar R., Travers M. (eds), Law and Social Theory, Oxford: Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2307/1109858
Eng, S. (2002) 'Legislative Inflation and the Quality of Law' in Wintgens, L. (eds) Legisprudence: A New Theoretical Approach to Legislation : Proceedings of the Fourth BeneluxScandinavian Symposium on Legal Teory. Oxford-Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing.
Frank J. (1949) Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gesetz zur Abmilderung der Folgen der COVID-19-Pandemie im Zivil-, Insolvenz-und Strafverfahrensrechtvom 27.März2020, BGBl. I S.569 (Germany).
Irti, N. (1979) L'età della decodificazione, Milano: Giuffrè.
Loi relative au crédit à la consommation, visant à aider les emprunteurs à faire face à la crise provoquée par le coronavirus, 27 Mai 2020 (Belgium).
McKee, M., Stuckler, D. (2020) If the world fails to protect the economy, COVID-19 will damage health not just now but also in the future [Online]. Available at: https://www. nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0863-y (Accessed: 30 October 2020).
Mandelkern Report (2001) Mandelkern Group on Better Regulation. Final Report 13 November 2001 [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/better_regulation/documents/mandelkern_report.pdf (Accessed: 30 October 2020).
Murillo, M.L. (2001) 'The Evolution of Codification in the Civil Law Legal Systems: Towards Decodification and Recodification' Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 11, pp. 163-181.
OECD (1994) Improving the quality of laws and regulations: economic, legal and managerial techniques, Paris.
Ordonnance n° 2020-306 du 25 mars 2020 relative à la prorogation des délais échus pendant la période d'urgence sanitaire et à l'adaptation des procédures pendant cette même période (France).
Ost, F., Kerchove van der, M. (1999) 'Constructing the Complexity of the Law: Towards a Dialectic Theory' in Wintgens L. (eds), The Law in Philosophical Perspectives: My Philosophy of Law, Dodrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9317-5_6
Peters, B. (1996) 'On Reconstructive Legal and Political Theory' in Deflem M. (eds), Habermas, Modernity and Law, London-Thousand Oaks-New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Rezza Baqaee, D., Farhi, E. (2020) Supply and Demand in Disaggregated Keynesian Economies with an Application to the Covid-19 Crisis [Online]. Available at: https:// scholar.harvard.edu/files/farhi/files/keynesian_draft_v6.pdf (Accessed: 30 October 2020). https://doi.org/10.3386/w27152
Rivera, J.C. eds (2013) The Scope and Structure of Civil Codes, Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7942-6
Rudnicki, J. (2017) 'Remarks Regarding the Influence of European Legislation upon Codification of Civil Law', Studia Iuridica 71, pp. 207-217. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.5830
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Jürgen Habermas [Online]. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/habermas/ (Accessed: 30 October 2020).
Su, Ch., Longchamps de Bérier, F., Grzebyk, P. eds (2019) Theory and Practice of Codification: the Chinese and Polish Perspective, Beijing: China Social Press.
Teubner, G. (1988) 'The Transformation of Law in the Welfare State', in Teubner, G. (eds) Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, New York-Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112329887
Teubner, G. (1997) 'The Kings Many Bodies: The Self-Deconstruction of Law's Hierarchy', Law and Society Review, 31(4), pp. 726-788. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053986
Turska, A. (1987) 'Selected Problems of Juridization of Socio-Economic Phenomena' in Dutkiewicz P. and Gorzelak G. (eds), Local Studies in Poland, Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski.
Tyler, T.R. (1990) Why people obey the law. 1st edn. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ustawa z dnia 2 marca 2020 o szczególnych rozwiązaniach związanych z zapobieganiem, przeciwdziałaniem i zwalczaniem COVID-19, innych chorób zakaźnych oraz wywołanych nimi sytuacji kryzysowych (Dz. U. z 2020 r., poz. 1842) (Poland).
Wallop, M. (1994) 'Tyranny in America: Would Alexis De Tocqueville Recognize This Place', Journal of Legislation 20(1), pp. 37-56.
Zacher, H. (1987) 'Juridification of in the Field of Social Law' in Teubner, G. (eds), Juridification of Social Spheres, Berlin-New York: de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110921472.373
Ziembiński, Z. (1987) 'The Methodological Problems of Theory and Philosophy of Law: a Survey', in Ziembiński, Z. (ed) Polish Contributions to the Theory and Philosophy of Law, Amsterdam: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004457041_006
Zimmermann, R. (1990) The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, Capetown-Wetton-Johannesburg: Juta