Euromaidan and conflict in Eastern Ukraine in social networking sites: Territorial differences of pro-Russian subscriptions in Ukraine

  • Mykola Dobysh Department of Geography, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine
Keywords: securitization of cyberspace, Euromaidan, conflict in Eastern Ukraine, social networking sites


Securitization of cyberspace is of great geopolitical concern. Behaviour on the Internet is not diminishing the influence of existing borders but can polarize society along territorial divisions. The paper explores territorial differences in the subscription to public pages and open groups in social networking sites (SNS), which emerged as a reaction to revolutionary events in Ukraine (known as Euromaidan or Revolution of Dignity) in 2013–2014 and Russia-backed armed conflict in the East of the country. The findings show differences in subscription to such pages in Vkontakte (the most popular SNS in Ukraine before a ban in 2017) among citizens of Ukraine and Russia, regional centres in Ukraine, cities in uncontrolled by Ukrainian government territories, reclaimed by Ukrainian army territories, territories of Lugansk and Donetsk regions which were not under substantial control of Russia-backed separatists, and peripherial cities of the neighbouring Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, and Zaporizhya oblasts. The paper also analyzes the geopolitical narratives of pro-Russian public pages in Vkontakte and shows how SNS could be used as a geopolitical tool.


Barrington, L.W. and Herron, E.S. 2004. One Ukraine or many? Regionalism in Ukraine and its political consequences. Nationalities Papers 32. (1): 53–86.

Bernazzoli, R.M. and Flint, C. 2009. Power, place, and militarism: toward a comparative geographic analysis of militarization. Geography Compass 3. (1): 393–411.

Birch, S. 2000. Interpreting the regional effect in Ukrainian politics. Europe-Asia Studies 52. (6): 1017–1041.

Borondo, J., Morales, A.J., Benito, R.M. and Losada, J.C. 2014. Mapping the online communication patterns of political conversations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 414. 403–413.

Bourdieu, P. 1998. On Television. New York, The New Press.

Clem, R.S. and Craumer, P.R. 2008. Orange, blue and white, and blonde: the electoral geography of Ukraine's 2006 and 2007 Rada elections. Eurasian Geography and Economics 49. (2): 127–151.

Conroy, M., Feezell, J.T. and Guerrero, M. 2012. Facebook and political engagement: a study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior 28. (5): 1535–1546.

Duvanova, D., Nikolaev, A., Nikolsko-Rzhevskyy, A. and Semenov, A. 2016. Violent conflict and online segregation: an analysis of social network communication across Ukraine's regions. Journal of Comparative Economics 44. (1): 163–181.

Duvanova, D., Semenov, A. and Nikolaev, A. 2015. Do social networks bridge political divides? The analysis of VKontakte social network communication in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs 31. (3): 224–249.

Frame, A. and Brachotte, G. 2015. Le tweet stratégique: use of Twitter as a PR tool by French politicians. Public Relations Review 41. (2): 278–287.

Friedman, Th.L. 2005. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Gaufman, E. 2015. Memory, media, and securitization: Russian media framing of the Ukrainian crisis. Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society 1. (1): 141–175.

Gemius 2015. Auditoria Uaneta. Retrieved on 7 March 2015 from:

Goldenberg, J. and Levy, M. 2009. Distance is not dead: social interaction and geographical distance in the internet era. Computers and Society 2. 1–22.

Helmus, T.C., Bodine-Baron, E., Radin, A., Magnuson, M., Mendelsohn, J., Marcellino, W., Bega, A. and Winkelman, Z. 2018. Russian Social Media Influence: Understanding Russian Propaganda in Eastern Europe. Santa Monica CA, RAND Corporation.

Jackson, L. and Valentine, G. 2014. Emotion and politics in a mediated public sphere: questioning democracy, responsibility and ethics in a computer mediated world. Geoforum 52. 193–202.

Johnston, R.J., Shelley, F.M. and Taylor, P.J. (eds.) 1990. Developments in Electoral Geography. New York, Routledge.

Kasamara, V. and Sorokina, A. 2012. Imperial ambitions of Russians. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45. (3–4): 279–288.

Kasmani, M.F., Sabran, R. and Ramle, N. 2014. Can Twitter be an effective platform for political discourse in Malaysia? A study of #PRU13. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 155. (October): 348–355.

Kruikemeier, S. 2014. How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior 34. 131–139.

Liber, G.O. 1998. Imagining Ukraine: regional differences and the emergence of an integrated state identity, 1926–1994. Nations and Nationalism 4. (2): 187–206.

Lippmann, W. 2017. Public Opinion. New York, Routledge.

Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S. 1967. Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: an introduction. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments; Cross-national Perspectives. Eds.: Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S., Michigan, University of Michigan Free Press, 1–50.

Nam, T. 2012. Dual effects of the internet on political activism: reinforcing and mobilizing. Government Information Quarterly 29. Supplement 1. 90–97.

O'Loughlin, J. 2001. The regional factor in contemporary Ukrainian politics: scale, place, space, or Bogus effect? Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 42. 1–33.

O'Loughlin, J., Toal, G. and Kolosov, V. 2016. Who identifies with the 'Russian World'? Geopolitical attitudes in Southeastern Ukraine, Crimea, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria. Eurasian Geography and Economics 57. (6): 745–778.

Osipian, Al.L. 2015. Historical myths, enemy images, and regional identity in the Donbass insurgency (Spring 2014). Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society 1. (1): 109–140.

Osipian, Ar.L. and Osipian, Al.L. 2012. Regional diversity and divided memories in Ukraine: contested past as electoral resource, 2004–2010. East European Politics & Societies 26. 616–642.

Park, Ch.S. 2013. Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior 29. (4): 1641–1648.

Peisakhin, L. 2013. In history's shadow: do formal institutions leave a cultural legacy? Barcelona, EPSA 2013 Annual General Conference Papers, No 286.

Pinkerton, A. and Benwell, M. 2014. Rethinking popular geopolitics in the Falklands/Malvinas sovereignty dispute: creative diplomacy and citizen statecraft. Political Geography 38. 12–22.

Pinkerton, A., Young, S. and Dodds, K. 2011. Weapons of mass communication: the securitization of social networking sites. Political Geography 30. (3): 115–117.

Simons, G. 2015. Perception of Russia's soft power and influence in the Baltic States. Public Relations Review 41. (1): 1–13.

Steenkamp, M. and Hyde-Clarke, N. 2014. The use of Facebook for political commentary in South Africa. Telematics and Informatics 31. (1): 91–97.

Takhteyev, Yu., Gruzd, A. and Wellman, B. 2012. Geography of Twitter networks. Social Networks 34. (1): 73–81.

Wang, D.M., Costa, E., Haynes, N., McDonald, T., Nicolescu, R., Sinanan, J., Spyer, J., Venkatraman, S. and Nyuan, X. 2016. How the World Changed Social Media. London, UCL Press.

How to Cite
DobyshM. (2019). Euromaidan and conflict in Eastern Ukraine in social networking sites: Territorial differences of pro-Russian subscriptions in Ukraine. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 68(1), 51-64.