New realities of the administrative-territorial structure of Ukraine and areas of ethnic minorities’ settlement: Geographical correlations and social consequences

Examples of Zakarpattia, Chernivtsi and Odesa oblasts

Keywords: administrative and territorial reform, ethnic minorities, settlements, local self-government, territorial communities, Ukraine

Abstract

This article analyses the ethno-geographical problems of the reformed system of administrative and territorial structure of Ukraine. The authors consider the alignment of newly created administrative units (rayons, territorial communities) and areas of compact settlement of ethnic minorities as a favourable prerequisite for the organisation of local self-government and the establishment of balanced and mutually beneficial ethno-political relations in the state. The analysis of the ethno-geographical parameters of ethnic minorities and the configuration of the newly created administrative-territorial units revealed that the population of ethnic minorities in Zakarpattia, Chernivtsi and Odesa oblasts was given the opportunity to organise territorial communities in which they constitute the majority. At the same time, studies have shown that it was not easy to implement this approach in the newly created administrative districts, given the officially defined criteria, the politicisation of the issue and the relatively high degree of mosaic settlement of ethnic groups. Therefore, the ethno-geographical factor was only partially taken into account in the formation of new administrative districts and the selection of district centres.

References

BARANCHUK, V. 1998. The role of local self-government in the formation and reform of the system of territorial organisation of state power in Ukraine. Bulletin of the State Service of Ukraine 4. 44–50. (in Ukrainian)

BARANOVSKYI, M.O. 2017. Financial decentralisation in Ukraine: Peculiarities of formation. Ukrainian Geographical Journal 4. 30–38. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2017.04.030

BARANOVSKYI, M.O. 2020. Subregional level of administrative and territorial reform in Ukraine: discussion aspects. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geography 76–77. (1–2): 37–43. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2020.76-77.5

CEMR 2009. Balancing Democracy, Identity and Efficiency: Changes in Local and Regional Structures in Europe. Brussels, Council of European Municipalities and Regions.

DNISTRIANSKYI, M.S. 2006. Ethnopolitical Geography of Ukraine: Theoretical Problems, Methodology, and Practice. Lviv, Litopys Publishing Centre of Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. (in Ukrainian)

DNISTRIANSKYI, M.S. and CHAIKA, I.M. 2023. Location of small towns and rural settlements of Ukraine and new realities of the administrative territorial system: Contradictions and perspectives of mutual influences. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology 1. 3–16. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.15421/112301

DOBYSH, M. 2019. Euromaidan and conflict in Eastern Ukraine in social networking sites: Territorial differences of pro-Russian subscriptions in Ukraine. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 68. (1): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.68.1.4

DRUZIUK, S. 1998. Problems of the institute of local self-government in the context of M.S. Hrushevsky's constitutional views. Law of Ukraine 3. 87–88. (in Ukrainian)

FEDCHYSHYN, M. and FRONCHKO, V. 2000. Administrative structure yesterday, today, tomorrow. Viche 9. 38–46. (in Ukrainian)

FODOR, GY. 2010. The situation of human resources development in Transcarpathia from an interethnic perspective. Doctoral thesis. Debrecen, University of Debrecen. (in Hungarian)

GNATIUK, O., MEZENTSEV, K. and PIDGRUSHNYI, G. 2022. Rethinking of identity under war: Pryazovia renaissance and regional centre ambitions in Mariupol before 2022. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 71. (3): 271–286. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.71.3.4

HAJDÚ, Z. 2014. A közigazgatási térszervezési teleszkóp és területszervezési reformviták Romániában az ország európai uniós csatlakozása (2007) óta (The administrative spatial telescope and the spatial planning reform debates in Romania since the country's accession to the European Union [2007]). Közép-Európai Közlemények 7. (3–4): 33–40.

HRUŠKA, V. and PÍŠA, J. 2019. Winning and losing rural localities of the post-socialist economic restructuring: case study of Czechia. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 68. (4): 373–389. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.68.4.4

KARÁCSONYI, D., KOCSIS, K., KOVÁLY, K., MOLNÁR, J. and PÓTI, L. 2014. East-West dichotomy and political conflict in Ukraine – Was Huntington right? Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 63. (2): 99–134. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.63.2.1

KORZENIEWSKA-WISZNIEWSKA, M. 2020. Administrative and territorial organization of the state as a tool of ethnic politics: The example of the Republic of Croatia. Politeja 68. 237–256.

KUCHABSKYI, O.G. 2010. Administrative and Territorial Organisation of Ukraine: Theory, Methodology, Mechanisms of Formation. Monograph. Lviv, LRIDU NADU. (in Ukrainian)

KUCZABSKI, O.G., ZASTAVETSKA, L. and ZASTAVETSKYI, T. 2017. The reform of administrative division in Ukraine: Problems of territorial communities’ formation in the Polish-Ukrainian borderland. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society 7. (2): 87–97. https://doi.org/10.4467/24512249JG.17.019.6635

MAKAROV, H. 2022. The ethnic factor in reforming the administrative-territorial system: The experience of European democratic states. Public Administration Aspects 10. (5): 54–61. https://doi.org/10.15421/152235 (in Ukrainian)

MELNICHUK, A.L. 2020. Five years of forming a new basic level of administrative territorial structure: Successes and challenges of the reform in Ukraine. Kyiv, Association of Amalgamated Territorial Communities. (in Ukrainian)

MEZEI, I. and HARDI, T. 2003. A szlovák közigazgatás és területfejlesztés aszimmetriái (Asymmetries in Slovak public administration and territorial development). Tér és Társadalom 17. (4): 127–155. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.17.4.920

MRUCHKOVSKYI, P.V. 2018. Ethnic structure of the population of the Western Ukrainian region (socio-geographical analysis). Qualification scientific work on the rights of a manuscript. Chernivtsi. (in Ukrainian)

MUSTAFAIEVA, E. 2018. Principles of amalgamation of territorial communities in places of compact residence of national minorities in the context of decentralisation as an integral part of ethno-national policy in Ukraine. Public Administration and Local Government 1. 22–30. (in Ukrainian)

MÜLLER-CREPON, C. 2023. Building tribes: How administrative units shaped ethnic groups in Africa. American Journal of Political Science. Online publication. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12835

NADOLISHNII, P. 1999. Building a New System of Governance in Ukraine: Ethno-National Aspect. Kyiv–Odesa, UADU–Astro-Print. (in Ukrainian)

NÉMETH, Á. 2019. A diverzitási indexek alaptípusai és alkalmazási lehetőségei az etnicitáskutatásban (Basic types of diversity indices and their applications in ethnicity research). Tér és Társadalom 33. (2): 130–148. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.33.2.3123

On Approval of the Methodology of Forming Capable Territorial Communities. Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of 8 April 2015. No. 214. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/214-2015-%D0%BF#n10 (in Ukrainian)

On Voluntary Amalgamation of Territorial Communities. Law of Ukraine of 5 February 2015. No. 157-VIII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/157-19 (in Ukrainian)

OSOIAN, I., SIRODOEV, I., VEVERITA, E. and PROHNIȚCHI, V. 2010. Analytical study on optimal administrative-territorial structure for the Republic of Moldova. Chișinău, Expert-Grup Centru Analitic Independent.

SAVCHUK, I. 2020. New administrative and territorial division of Ukraine – New challenge for national interest. National Interest 1. (1): 37–45.

SKLIARSKA, O.I. 2021. Reform of the administrative system of Ukraine in the context of influence on the status and functions of settlements. Scientific Notes of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University. Series Geography 1. (50): 57–64. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.25128/2519-4577.21.1.7

SKLIARSKA, O.I. 2022. Rural settlement as a factor of administrative-territorial changes (on the example of Zakarpattia and Chernivtsi Oblasts). Man and the Environment. Problems of Neo-ecology 38. 20–28. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4224-2022-38-02 (in Ukrainian)

SKRYZHEVSKA, Y. and KARÁCSONYI, D. 2012. Rural population in Ukraine: Assessing reality, looking for revitalization. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 61. (1): 49–78.

SZILÁGYI, F. 2010. Az új román területi közigazgatás lehetséges elvi alapjai (Possible principles for a new Romanian territorial administration). Magyar Kisebbség 15. (3–4): 225–246.

VAN DER WUSTEN, H. 2015. Imagined communities and practiced geopolitics. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64. (4): 281–291. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.64.4.2

ZABLOTSKYI, V. 2021. Ethno-national aspects of administrative and territorial reform in Ukraine at the regional and local levels. Scientific Perspectives 5. 73–84. (in Ukrainian)

ZASTAVETSKA, L.B. 2013. Settlement Systems and Geospatial Problems of Improving the Administrative and Territorial Structure of Ukraine. Monograph. Ternopil, V. Hnatiuk TNPU. (in Ukrainian)

Additional online sources:

books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Ukraine&year_start=1980&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=0. Access date: 20.04.2024.

pop-stat.mashke.org/ukraine-census-2001-lang/total.htm. Access date: 26.03.2024.

www.kmu.gov.ua/reformi/efektivne-vryaduvannya/reforma-decentralizaciyi (2020). Access date: 17.09.2024. (in Ukrainian)

Published
2024-12-18
How to Cite
DnistrianskyiM., MolnárJ., DnistrianskaN., & Molnár D.I. (2024). New realities of the administrative-territorial structure of Ukraine and areas of ethnic minorities’ settlement: Geographical correlations and social consequences: Examples of Zakarpattia, Chernivtsi and Odesa oblasts. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 73(4), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.73.4.4
Section
Articles