Exploring new dimensions of urban governance: The development of administrative systems in Trieste and Fiume (Rijeka) during the final decades of the Habsburg Empire (1850–1918)
Abstract
Urban governance is often perceived as a concept that has emerged over the past half-century, evolving from the policy of urban government. The analysis of this shift, known as the “transformation thesis,” has been criticized by recent studies in the field, which focus on the theory of metagovernance. However, both branches of urban governance literature heavily rely on knowledge of American cities, hindering a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon. There is a growing demand to broaden the temporal and geographical scope of case studies and conduct more comparative research to better understand the roots and current processes of urban governance. While the fundamental driving forces behind the emergence of modern municipal administration during the 19th century have been adequately explored, various characteristics of different geographical locations might add new dimensions and approaches to understanding urban governance. This study offers a comprehensive insight into the birth and early formation of urban governance systems in the free ports of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, namely Trieste and Fiume (Rijeka in Croatian). By analyzing legal documents and applying a mixed-method approach, this study unravels the institutional structures, electoral systems, and municipal authorities of Trieste and Fiume from the 1848 Revolution until the end of the First World War. In addition to the historical and Central European perspectives, this paper aims to explore rarely considered contextual factors of urban governance, such as legal-administrative, socio-economic, and political elements. The comparative analysis of Trieste and Fiume demonstrates that even within the same empire, a wide range of diverse influences could shape urban governance systems. Despite these varied factors and significantly different administrative contexts, surprisingly similar governance practices could also emerge.
References
AA, 1850. 139. kaiserliches Patent vom 12. April 1850, wodurch die Versassung für die reichunmittelbare Stadt Triest erlassen und verkündet wird (Imperial Patent No. 139 of 12 April 1850, whereby the constitution for the imperial city of Trieste is issued and announced). Reichsgesetzblatt 1849–1918, 12. April 1850, No. 139.
AA, 1861. Landes-Ordnung und Landtags-Wahlordnung für das Küstenland, d. i. für die reichunmittelbare Stadt Triest mit ihrem Gebiete, für die gefürstete Graffschaft Görz und Gradiska, und für die Markgraffschaft Istrien (Regulations on the provincial government and the election of the provincial parliament for the Imperial Free City of Trieste and its territory, for the County of Gorizia and Gradiska, and for the Margraviate of Istria). Reichsgesetzblatt 1849–1918, 26. February 1861, No. 20. Annex No.2. section i.
AA, 1862. Gesetz vom 5. März 1862, womit die grundsätzlichen Bestimmungen zur Regelung des Gemeindewesens vorgezeichnet werden (Act of 5 March 1862, which specifies the basic provisions for the regulation of municipal affairs). Reichsgesetzblatt 1849–1918, 5. March 1862, No. 18.
AA, 1866. Gesetz über die Gemeinde-Statuten der Stadt Krakau (Act on Municipal Statute of the City of Cracow). Landesgesetzblatt Galizien 1772–918, 13. April 1866, No. 7.
AA, 1882. Gesetz, giltig für die reichsunmittelbare Stadt Triest, womit dem § 119 lit. d der Verfassung der Stadt Triest ein Absatz beigefügt wird (Act applies to the Imperial Free City of Trieste, with which a paragraph is added to § 119 of the Constitution of the City of Trieste). Landesgesetzblatt Triest und Küstenland 1851–1918, 10. February 1882, No.7.
AA, 1885. Gesetz vom 1. April 1882, LGBl. Nr. 8/1885, womit die Umfangsgrenze der Stadt Triest festgestellt und der § 41 der Verfassung der reichsunmittelbaren Stadt Triest abgeändert wird (Act of 1 April 1882, LGBl. No. 8/1885, which establishes the perimeter of the city of Trieste and amends § 41 of the Constitution of the Imperial Free City of Trieste). Landesgesetzblatt Triest und Küstenland 1851–1918, 5. March 1885, No. 8.
AA, 1891. Gesetz, womit in Durchführung des Gesetzes vom 30. April 1889 (R. G. Bl. Nr. 63) die näheren Anordnungen, betreffend die Einbeziehung des Freihafengebietes von Triest in das österreichisch-ungarische Zollgebiet getroffen werden (Act on implementing the law of 30 April 1889 (R. G. Bl. No. 63) laying down detailed provisions concerning the inclusion of the free port area of Trieste in the Austro-Hungarian customs territory). Reichsgesetzblatt 1849–1918, 24. June 1891, No. 76.
AA, 1908. Gesetz, mit welchem die Verfassung der reichsunmittelbaren Stadt Triest abgeändert und eine Wahlordnung für den Gemeinderat von Triest erlassen wird (Act amending the constitution of the Imperial Free City of Trieste and establishing electoral regulations for the Municipal Council of Trieste). Landesgesetzblatt Triest und Küstenland 1851–1918, 29. September 1908, No. 44.
AA, 1910. Gesetz vom 26. Mai 1910, LGBl. Nr. 24, betr. die Abänderung des § 126 des kaiserlichen Patents vom 12. April 1850, wodurch die Verfassung der reichsunmittelbaren Stadt Triest erlassen und verkündet wurde (Act of 26 May 1910, LGBl. No. 24, concerning the amendment of § 126 of the Imperial Patent of 12 April 1850, whereby the Constitution of the Imperial Free City of Trieste was issued and promulgated). Landesgesetzblatt Triest und Küstenland 1851–1918, 26. May 1910, No. 24.
ANDREW, C. and GOLDSMITH, M. 1998. From local government to local governance? – and beyond. International Political Science Review 19. (2): 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251298019002002
BAILEY, D. and WOOD, M. 2017. The metagovernance of English devolution. Local Government Studies 43. (6): 966–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1359165
BERG-NORDLIE, M. 2018. The governance of urban indigenous spaces: Norwegian Sámi examples. Acta Borealia 35. (1): 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2018.1457316
BRAUNEDER, W. 1994. Osztrák alkotmánytörténet napjainkig (Constitutional history of Austria till nowadays). Pécs, Janus Pannonius Tudományegyetem.
BRENNER, N. 2004. New State Spaces, Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270057.001.0001
ČEPULO, D. 2010. Centralisation, modernisation and nation-building in Croatia and Slavonia: Reforms of the county system 1848–1918. In Parliaments: The Law, the Practice and the Representations. From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Ed.: COELHO, R., Lisbon, Assembleia da Republica, Universidade de Coimbra, 143–149.
DEAR, M. and DAHMANN, N. 2008. Urban politics and the Los Angeles School of Urbanism. Urban Affairs Review 44. (2): 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087408320240
DIGAETANO, A. 2009. The birth of modern urban governance: A comparison of political modernization in Boston, Massachusetts, and Bristol, England, 1800–1870. Journal of Urban History 35. (2): 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144208327914
DIGAETANO, A. and KLEMANSKI, J.S. 1999. Power and City Governance. Comparative Perpectives on Urban Development. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
ECKARDT, F. and ELANDER, I. 2009. Urban Governance in Europe. Berlin, Berliner Wissenschafts Verlag.
ERDŐSI, F. 2005. A Balkán közlekedésének főbb földrajzi jellemzői (Main geographical features of traffic in the Balkans). Pécs, PTE TTK FI Kelet-Mediterrán és Balkán Tanulmányok Központja.
ERDŐSI, F. 2022. Trieszt – Fiume: Két szomszédos kikötő versengése az első világháborúig (Trieste – Fiume: Competition between two neighbouring ports until the First World War). Pécs, Közgazdaság- és Regionális Tudományi Kutatóközpont Regionális Kutatások Intézete.
FAIRBANKS, R.B. 1999. Rethinking urban problems, planning, zoning, and city government in Dallas, 1900–1930. Journal of Urban History 25. (6): 809–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/009614429902500602
GERGELY, J. 2005. Autonómiák Magyarországon, 1848–2000 (Autonomies in Hungary, 1848–2000). Budapest, L'Harmattan Kiadó.
GJALTEMA, J., BIESBROEK, R. and TERMEER, K. 2019. From government to governance… to meta-governance: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review 22. (12): 1760–1780. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1648697
GOLDSMITH, M. and GARRAND, J. 2000. Urban governance: Some reflections. In Urban Governance: Britain and Beyond since 1750. Eds.: MORRIS, J. and TRAINOR, H., London, Routledge, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315235271-2
GOULD, S.W. 1945. The Slovenes. The Social Studies 36. (7): 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1937.11017098
GOVORCHIN, G.G. 1955. The struggle for Trieste. The Social Studies 46. (4): 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1939.11017904
GRIFFANTE, A. 2015. Between empire and nation state. Urban space and conflicting memories in Trieste (19th–early 20th century). Journal of Architecture and Urbanism 39. (1): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2015.1031441
GURI, D. 1953. The importance of Trieste. The Social Studies 44. (8): 301–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.1953.9957369
HA,1870. Ferenc József legfelső kézirata a fiumei provizórium bevezetéséről (Bécs, 1870. július 28.) (Franz Joseph's patent on the introduction of the Provisional in Fiume [Vienna, 28 July 1870]).
HA, 1872a. Fiume szabad város és kerületének statútuma (The statute of the Free City of Fiume and its district). Act of the Hungarian parliament, assented by the emperor in 1 June 1872.
HA, 1872b. 1872. évi XXXVI. törvénycikk Buda-Pest fővárosi törvényhatóság alakitásáról és rendezéséről (XXXVI. legal article of 1872 on the formation and organization of the capital municipality of Buda-Pest). Act of the Hungarian parliament, assented by the emperor in 22 December 1872.
HA, 1886a. 1886. évi XXI. törvénycikk a törvényhatóságokról (XXI. legal article on the counties and Municipalities). Act of the Hungarian parliament, assented by the emperor in 27 June 1886.
HA, 1886b. 1886. évi XXII. törvénycikk a községekről (XXII. legal article on the municipalities). Act of the Hungarian parliament, assented by the emperor in 27 June 1886.
HA, 1891. 1891. évi XVIII. törvénycikk az 1889. évi XVI. tc. végrehajtásában Fiume szabad kikötő területének az osztrák-magyar vámterületbe való bevonása iránt teendő intézkedésekről (Act XVIII of 1891 about the Act XVI of 1889 on the measures to be taken in order to include the area of the free port of Fiume in the Austro-Hungarian customs territory). Act of the Hungarian parliament, assented by the emperor in 23 June 1891.
HA, 1901. A magyar kormány rendelete a Fiuméban szervezendő középfokú közigazgatási hatóságról (Budapest, 1901. július 2.) (Order of the Hungarian government on the secondary administrative authority to be organized in Fiume [Budapest, 2 July 1901]).
HA, 1913. A m. kir belügyminiszter 1913. évi 5.361. eln. számú rendelete a fiumei kormányzóhoz, Fiume és a magyar-horvát tengerpart kir. kormányzójának kivételes hatáskörrel felruházásáról (No. 5,361 Decree of 1913 of the Hungarian Royal Minister of the Interior to the Governor of Fiume, granting exceptional powers to the Royal Governor of Fiume and the Hungarian-Croatian coast).
HA, 1916. 1916. évi XXXVII. törvénycikk a fiumei m. kir. állami rendőrségről (Act No. XXXVII of 1916 on the Hungarian Royal State Police in Fiume). Act of the Hungarian parliament, assented by the emperor in 28 October 1916.
HAJDÚ, Z. 2013. Fiume 1868–1918: Erisz almája, avagy lebegő gyöngyszem Szent István koronáján? (Fiume 1868–1918: Eris's apple, or a floating pearl on the crown of Saint Stephen?). Közép-Európai Közlemények 22. (3): 7–14.
HANLEY, A.G. 2012. A failure to deliver: Municipal poverty and the provision of public services in Imperial São Paulo, Brazil 1822–1889. Journal of Urban History 39. (3): 513–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144212440886
HARVEY, D. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 1. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/490503
HELMEDACH, A. 2002. Das Verkehrssystem als Modernisierungsfaktor: Strassen, Post, Fuhrwesen und Reisen nach Triest und Fiume vom Beginn des 18. Jahrhunderts bis zum Eisenbahnzeitalter (The transport system as a modernisation factor: Roads, post, carriage and travel to Trieste and Fiume from the beginning of the 18th century to the railway age). München, Oldenbourg.
HILBERT, B. 2023. A modern (polgári) városi kormányzás születése Közép-Európában – Az Osztrák–Magyar Monarchia városainak földrajzi jogtudományi vizsgálata (1867–1918) (The birth of modern urban governance in Central Europe – Legal geographical study of the cities of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy [1867–1918]). Budapest, Eötvös Loránd University, Doctoral School of Earth Sciences.
HILBERT, B. 2024. Urban governance systems in autonomous territories of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy: The cases of Croatia-Slavonia and Austrian Galicia (1867–1918). Geographia Polonica 97. (1): 23–46. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0267
HOREL, C. 2023. Multicultural Cities of the Habsburg Empire, 1880–1914. Imagined Communities and Conflictual Encounters. Budapest–Vienna–New York, Central European University Press. https://doi.org/10.7829/j.ctv2kzv0mg
JELINEK, CS. and PÓSFAI, ZS. 2013. Bevezetés: A városi önkormányzattól a városi kormányzásig (Introduction: From urban government to urban governance). In Kritikai városkutatás. Eds.: JELINEK, CS., BODNÁR, J., CZIRFUSZ, M. and GYIMESI, Z., Budapest, L’Harmattan Kiadó, 145–154.
JESSOP, B. 2002. Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode 3. 452–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00250
KATUS, L. 2012. A modern Magyarország születése, Magyarország története 1711–1914 (The birth of modern Hungary, the history of Hungary 1711–1914). Pécs, Kronosz Kiadó.
KUZMANY, B. 2016. Habsburg Austria: Experiments in non-territorial autonomy. Ethnopolitics 15. (1): 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1101838
LEVI-FAUR, D. 2011. From Big Government to Big Governance? Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance 35. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.0001
LO, C. 2017. Between government and governance: Opening the black box of the transformation thesis. International Journal of Public Administration 41. (8): 650–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1295261
MAKKAI, K. 2013. Horvátország és Fiume a dualista korszak magyar nemzetpolitikai törekvéseiben (Croatia and Fiume in the Hungarian national political aspirations of the dualist era). Közép-Európai Közlemények 6. (3): 15–26.
MARCUS, A.I. 1980. The strange career of municipal health initiatives, Cincinnati and city government in the early nineteenth century. Journal of Urban History 7. (1): 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/009614428000700101
MEZEY, B. 2004. Magyar jogtörténet (Legal history of Hungary). Budapest, Osiris Kiadó.
MICK, C. 2019. Legality, ethnicity and violence in Austrian Galicia, 1890–1920. European Review of History / Revue européenne d'histoire 26. (5): 757–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2019.1641693
MORRIS, J.R. 2000. Governance: Two centuries of urban growth. In Urban Governance: Britain and Beyond since 1750. Eds.: MORRIS, J. and TRAINOR, H., London, Routledge, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315235271-1
ORDASI, Á. 2018. Bombamerényletek a fiumei kormányzóság ellen (1913–1914) (Bomb attacks against the governor’s office at Fiume [1913–1914]). Századok 152. (2): 401–417.
ORDASI, Á. 2019. Modellváltások a fiumei kormányzóság feladat- és hatásköreinek meghatározásában – Centralizációs stratégiák Fiumében: Bevezető tanulmány a MNL Somogy Megyei Levéltár a fiumei kormányzóság repertóriumához (Model changes in the definition of tasks and powers of the Fiume governorate – Centralization strategies in Fiume: Introductory study for the repertoire of the MNL Somogy County Archives of the Fiume governorate). Kaposvár, Magyar Nemzeti Levéltár Somogy Megyei Levéltára.
OSBORNE, D. and GAEBLER, T. 1992. Re-inventing Government. New York, Addison Wesley.
PELLES, M. 2017. A fiumei autonómiatörekvések gazdasági vetülete a múlt századelőn – az Indeficienter gőzös hajó- és áruforgalma 1901–1914 között (The economic projection of Fiume's aspirations for autonomy on the beginning of the last century – the ship- and goods traffic of SS Indeficienter between 1901–1914). Köztes-Európa 9. (1–2): 47–53.
PERÉNYI, J. and KOVÁCS, E. 1986. Lengyelország története (1864–1948) (The history of Poland [1864–1948]). Budapest, Tankönyvkiadó.
PIERRE, J. 1999. Models of urban governance: The institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review 3. 372–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988
PIERRE, J. 2005. Comparative urban governance: Uncovering complex causalities. Urban Affairs Review 4. 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087404273442
RESS, I. 2009. Fiume államjogi helyzetének ellentmondásai (1776–1918) (Contradictions of Fiume's legal status [1776–1918]). Életünk 47. (1–12): 43–51.
RHODES, R.A.W. 1997. Reinventing Whitehall 1979–1995. In Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe. Ed.: KICKERT, W., Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 43–61.
SARLÓS, B. 1976. Közigazgatás és hatalompolitika a dualizmus rendszerében (Public administration and politics of power in the system of dualism). Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.
SELLERS, J.M. 2002. The nation-state and urban governance. Toward multilevel analysis. Urban Affairs Review 5. 611–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808740203700501
SIMON, P.P. 2013. Támadás Fiume autonómiája ellen: A fiumei Közigazgatási Bizottság 1897. évről készült jelentése nyomán (Attack against Fiume's autonomy: Following the report of the Fiume Administrative Board for 1897). Közép-Európai Közlemények 6. (3): 47–54.
SLACK, E. and CÔTÉ, A. 2014. Comparative Urban Governance. London, Foresight, Government Office for Science.
SOKCSEVITS, D. 2011. Horvátország a 7. századtól napjainkig (Croatia from the 7th century till nowadays). Budapest, Mundus Novus Könyvek.
SOMOGYI, É. 1996. Kormányzati rendszer a dualista Habsburg Monarchiában (System of government in the dualist Habsburg Monarchy). Budapest, História – MTA Történettudományi Intézete.
STOKER, G. 1998. Public-private partnerships and urban governance. In Partnerships in Urban Governance, European and American Experiences. Ed.: PIERRE, J., London, Palgrave Macmillan, 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14408-2_3
STONE, C. 1989. Regime Politics. Lawrence, University Press of Kansas.
SUTCLIFFE, A. 1995a. Növekvő hatósági beavatkozás a brit városi környezetbe a 19. század során: Strukturális megközelítés (Increasing public intervention in the British urban environment during the 19th century: A structural approach). In A Modern Város Történeti Dilemmái. Ed.: GYÁNI, G., Debrecen, Csokonai Kiadó, 158–170.
SUTCLIFFE, A. 1995b. A környezet ellenőrzése és tervezése az európai fővárosokban 1850-1914 között: London, Párizs és Berlin (Environmental control and planning in European capitals between 1850-1914: London, Paris and Berlin). In A Modern Város Történeti Dilemmái. Ed.: GYÁNI, G., Debrecen, Csokonai Kiadó, 109–126.
SZENTE, Z. 2011. Kormányzás a dualizmus korában (Governance in the age of dualism). Budapest, Atlantisz Kiadó.
TEAFORD, J.C. 1975. The Municipal Revolution in America. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
VAN DEN DOOL, L. 2015. The Quest for Good Urban Governance. Theoretical Reflections and International Practices. Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10079-7
WOOD, A.M. 2004. Domesticating urban theory? US concepts, British cities and the limits of cross-national applications. Urban Studies 41. (11): 2103–2118. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000268366
ZÖLLNER, E. 1998. Ausztria története (The history of Austria). Budapest, Osiris Kiadó.
Copyright (c) 2024 Bálint Hilbert
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
