Territorial identity of a region: A review of data collection techniques

Keywords: new regional geography, territorial identity, territorial shape, delimitation of region, border, boundary, identity of region, data collection techniques

Abstract

This scoping review focuses on methodological approaches and, in particular, data collection techniques, for investigating part of the identity of a region – the territorial identity (boundaries) – within the field of new regional geography. The paper builds on a continuously expanding compilation of studies from academic databases and supplementary reference searches in geographically oriented journals. Reviewing 76 articles, it identifies the principal data collection techniques, including the utilisation of secondary sources (e.g. literature and maps or databases of place names) and strategies for obtaining primary data with questioning. These represent two analytical perspectives: indirect (secondary data) and direct (primary data) identification of territorial identity. The techniques are analysed concerning methodological approaches, including the use of territorial identity markers or territorial identity perception, as well as in terms of various scales and research character (single or multiple regions examination). The findings demonstrate that secondary data are predominantly used for delimiting regions through territorial identity markers whereas primary data are employed mainly to delimit regions reflecting territorial identity perception. Furthermore, the choice of data is not inherently dependent on region scale, as even world regions can be studied using questioning. Additionally, the absence of temporal analysis and the under-representation of mixed research designs in the studies suggest avenues for future research. Integrating diverse data collection techniques and methodological approaches might capture the concept of the region better, offering valuable insights for theoretical advancement and practical applications.

References

AADLAND, M., FARAH, C. and MAGEE, K. 2016. µ-shapes: Delineating urban neighbourhoods using volunteered geographic information. Journal of Spatial Information Science 12. 29–43. https://doi.org/10.5311/JOSIS.2016.12.240

ALANI, H., JONES, C.B. and TUDHOPE, D. 2001. Voronoi-based region approximation for geographical information retrieval with gazetteers. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15. (4): 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810110038942

ALDERMAN, D.H. and BEAVERS, R.M. 1999. Heart of dixie revisited: An update on the geography of naming in the American south. Southeastern Geographer 39. (2): 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.1999.0017

ALDERMAN, D.H. and GOOD, D.B. 1996. Mapping the names of American businesses: A teaching and software aid. Journal of Geography 95. (6): 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221349608978741

ALHAZMI, J. 2017. A perceptual dialect map of western Saudi Arabia. WRoCAH Journal 3. 2–16.

ALLEN, J., MASSEY, D., COCHRANE, A., CHARLESWORTH, J., COURT, G., HENRY, N. and SARRE, P. 1998. Rethinking the Region. London, Routledge.

AMBINAKUDIGE, S. 2009. Revisiting “the south” and “dixie”: Delineating vernacular regions using GIS. Southeastern Geographer 49. (3): 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.0.0051

ANDREWS, J.R. and FINCHUM, A. 2020. Paring old dixie down: The dixie highway and the mapping of a vernacular south. Southeastern Geographer 60. (4): 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2020.0028

BABBIE, E. 2007. The Practice of Social Research. 11th Edition. Belmont, Thompson Wadsworth.

BARTOS-ELEKES, ZS. 2019. Mapping the core and periphery applied to a Choronym. The case of Székely Land. In Proceedings of the International Cartographical Association (ICA). Articles, Vol. 2. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-proc-2-8-2019

BARTŮNĚK, M. and BLÁHA, J.D. 2023. Visualising administrative division dynamics: Transformation of borders and names in the Bohemian-Saxonian borderland. GeoScape 17. (2): 118–134. https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2023-0008

BLÁHA, J.D. and NOVÁČEK, A. 2016. How Central Europe is perceived and delimited. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 158. 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1553/moegg158s193

BOUNDS, P. 2015. Perceptual regions in Poland: An investigation of Poznań speech perceptions. Journal of Linguistic Geography 3. 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2015.1

BOUNDS, P. and SUTHERLAND, C. J. 2018. Perceptual basemaps reloaded: The role basemaps play in eliciting perceptions. Journal of Linguistic Geography 6. 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2018.7

BROWNELL, J.W. 1960. The cultural Midwest. Journal of Geography 59. (2): 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221346008982048

CHROMÝ, P., KUČEROVÁ, S. and KUČERA, Z. 2009. Regional identity, contemporary and historical regions and the issue of relict borders – the case of Czechia. Regions and Regionalism 9. (2): 9–19.

CLIFFORD, N., FRENCH, S. and VALENTINE, G. 2010. Key Methods in Geography. 2nd Edition. London, SAGE Publications Ltd.

COLTEN, C.E. 1997. The land of Lincoln: Genesis of a vernacular region. Journal of Cultural Geography 16. (2): 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873639709478337

CRAMER, J. 2021. Mental maps and perceptual dialectology. Language and Linguistics Compass 15. (2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12405

DIDELON, C., DE RUFFRAY, S., BOQUET, M. and LAMBERT, N. 2011. A world of interstices: A fuzzy logic approach to the analysis of interpretative maps. The Cartographic Journal 48. (2): 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277411Y.0000000009

DRÁPALA, D. and PAVLICOVÁ, M. 2014. Etnografická rajonizace: úvahy nad jejím historickým vývojem a smyslem současné existence (Ethnographic regionalisation: reflections on its historical development and the meaning of its current existence). Národopisná revue 3. 171–188.

EDMONDSON, D. 2018. Regionalization: A story map lesson on regions. The Geography Teacher 15. (1): 36–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338341.2017.1413001

FLOWERDEW, R. and MARTIN, D. 2005. Methods in Human Geography: A Guide for Students Doing a Research Project. 2nd Edition. Harlow, Pearson.

FOTIOU, C. and GROHMANN, K.K. 2022. A small island with big differences? Folk perceptions in the context of dialect levelling and koineization. Frontiers in Communication 6. 770088: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.770088

GAO, S., JANOWICZ, K., MONTELLO, D.R., HU, Y., YANG, J-A., MCKENZIE, G., JU, Y., GONG, L., ADAMS, B. and YAN, B. 2017. A data-synthesis-driven method for detecting and extracting vague cognitive regions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 31. (6): 1245–1271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1273357

GERŠIČ, M. 2017. Changing denotations of selected Slovenian choronyms. Acta geographica Slovenica 57. (1): 77–96. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.4600

GILBERT, A. 1988. The new regional geography in English and French-speaking countries. Progress in Human Geography 12. (2): 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913258801200203

GNATIUK, O. and MELNYCHUK, A. 2019. Identities with historical regions – are they adapting to modern administrative division? The case of Ukraine. European Spatial Research and Policy 26. (1): 175–194. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.26.1.09

GNATIUK, O. and MELNYCHUK, A. 2021. Historical heraldic symbols as a marker of reproducing and transforming regional identity: The case of Ukraine. Geographia Polonica 94. (4): 589–607. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0222

GOOD, J.K. 1981. The vernacular regions of Arkansas. Journal of Geography 80. (5): 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221348108980675

GOODCHILD, M.F. 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69. (4): 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y

GREGORY, D., JOHNSTON, R., PRATT, G., WATTS, M.J. and WHATMORE, S. 2009. The Dictionary of Human Geography. 5th Edition. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.

HALE, R.F. 1983. Wisconsin’s vernacular regions. Bulletin of the Wisconsin Council for Geographic Education 4. (1): 12–16.

HALE, R.F. 1984. Commentary: Vernacular regions of America. Journal of Cultural Geography 5. (1): 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873638409478566

HEATH, D.E. 1993. Highly localized vernacular regionalization in the Allentown-Bethlehem area, PA-NJ. Professional Geographer 45. (3): 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1993.00251.x

HOLTKAMP, C., WEAVER, R. and BUTLER, D.R. 2018. The Rocky Mountains and the Southwest: Using feature names to study two iconic subregions in the American West. Geographical Review 108. (3): 410–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12262

HOMANYUK, M. 2019. "Battle for Tavria": A historical region in politics and in the market of goods and services. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya 82. 20–26. https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2019.82.20-26

ICOS Terms 2023. List of Key Onomastic Terms. International Council of Onomastic Sciences. Opensource. https://icosweb.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ICOS-Terms-en.pdf

JESZENSZKY, P., STEINER, C., VON ALLMEN, N. and LEEMANN, A. 2024. What drives non-linguists’ hands (or mouse) when drawing mental dialect maps? Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 39. (2): 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae003

JONAS, A. 1988. A new regional geography of localities? Area 20. (2): 101–110.

JONES, C.B., PURVES, R.S., CLOUGH, P.D. and JOHO, H. 2008. Modelling vague places with knowledge from the web. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 22. (10): 1045–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701850547

JORDAN, T.G. 1978. Perceptual regions in Texas. Geographical Review 68. (3): 293–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/215048

KAISTO, V. and WELLS, C. 2021. Mental mapping as a method for studying borders and bordering in young people’s territorial identifications. Journal of Borderlands Studies 36. (2): 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2020.1719864

KASALA, K. and ŠIFTA, M. 2017. The region as a concept: Traditional and constructivist view. AUC Geographica 52. (2): 208–218. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2017.17

KEATING, M. 1998. The New Regionalism in Western Europe. Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

KITCHIN, R. 1994. Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? Journal of Environmental Psychology 14. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80194-X

KONOPSKI, M. 2021. The role of administrative borders in determining regional identity: The case of Podlasie, Poland. Moravian Geographical Reports 29. (1): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2021-0005

LAMME, A.J. and OLDAKOWSKI, R.K. 1982. Vernacular areas in Florida. Southeastern Geographer 22. (2): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.1982.0012

LAMME, A.J. and OLDAKOWSKI, R.K. 2007. Spinning a new geography of vernacular regional identity: Florida in the twenty-first century. Southeastern Geographer 47. (2): 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2007.0029

LIESCH, M., DUNKLEE, L.M., LEGG, R.J., FEIG, A.D. and KRAUSE, A.J. 2015. Use of business-naming practices to delineate vernacular regions: A Michigan example. Journal of Geography 114. (5): 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.965187

LOWRY, J., PATTERSON, M. and FORBES, W. 2008. The perceptual Northwest. Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers 70. (1): 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1353/pcg.0.0009

LOWRY, J. 2013. Perceptual New England. The Northeastern Geographer 5. 54–71.

MAREK, P. 2020. Transformation of the identity of a region: Theory and the empirical case of the perceptual regions of Bohemia and Moravia, Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports 28. (3): 154–169. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0012

MAREK, P. 2023. Reproduction of the identity of a region: Perceptual regions based on formal and functional regions and their boundaries. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 105. (1): 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2022.2097113

MCEWEN, J.W. 2014. Louisiana: Apprehending a complex web of vernacular regional geography. Southeastern Geographer 54. (1): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2014.0001

MELNYCHUK, A., GNATIUK, O. and RASTVOROVA, M. 2014. Use of territorial identity Markers in geographical researches. Scientific Annals of „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi – Geography Series 60. (1): 157–184.

MELNYCHUK, A. and GNATIUK, O. 2018. Regional identity and the renewal of spatial administrative structures: The case of Podolia, Ukraine. Moravian Geographical Reports 26. (1): 42–54. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2018-0004

MINGHI, J.V. 1963. Boundary studies in political geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 53. (3): 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1963.tb00457.x

MIROŠEVIČ, L. and VUKOSAV, B. 2010. Spatial identities of Pag island and the southern part of the Velebit littoral. Geoadria 15. (1): 81–108. https://doi.org/10.15291/geoadria.546

MONTELLO, D.R., FRIEDMAN, A. and PHILLIPS, D.W. 2014. Vague cognitive regions in geography and geographic information science. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28. (9): 1802–1820. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2014.900178

MURPHY, A.B. 1991. Regions as social constructs: The gap between theory and practice. Progress in Human Geography 15. (1): 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259101500102

PAASI, A. 1986. The institutionalization of regions: A theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity. Fennia 164. (1): 105–146. https://doi.org/10.11143/9052

PAASI, A. 2002. Bounded spaces in the mobile world: Deconstructing ‘regional identity’. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 93. (2): 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00190

PAASI, A. 2009a. Regional geography I. In International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography 9. Eds.: KITCHIN, R. and THRIFT, N., Amsterdam, Elsevier. 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00736-7

PAASI, A. 2009b. Political boundaries. In International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography 8. Eds.: KITCHIN, R. and THRIFT, N., Amsterdam, Elsevier. 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00793-8

PAASI, A. and ZIMMERBAUER, K. 2016. Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: Relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A 48. (1): 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15594805

PADŁO, T., STRUŚ, P. and GIL, A. 2021. Danube as a symbol of Europe. Perception of the river from varied geographical perspectives. PLoS ONE 16. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260848

PÁNEK, J. and ŠENKEŘÍKOVÁ, M. 2018. Kde leží Blízký východ? Srovnání definic a mentální mapy regionu očima vysokoškolských studentů (Where does the Middle East lie? A comparison of definitions and mental maps of the region with the eyes of university students). Informace ČGS 37. (2): 31–41.

PENG, J., STRIJKER, D. and WU, Q. 2020. Place identity: How far have we come in exploring its meanings? Frontiers in Psychology 11. 294: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00294

PHILLIPS, D.W. and MONTELLO, D.R. 2017. Defining the community of interest as thematic and cognitive regions. Political Geography 61. 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.06.005

PLEIĆ, T., GLASNOVIĆ, V., PRELOGOVIĆ, V. and KAUFMANN, P.R. 2021. In search of spatial perceptions: The Balkans as a vernacular region. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 112. (3): 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12470

POLONSKÝ, F., NOVOTNÝ, J. and LYSÁK, J. 2010. Cognitive mapping of major world regions among Czech geography students. Journal of Maps 6. (1): 311–318. https://doi.org/10.4113/jom.2010.1083

PRED, A. 1984. Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 74. (2): 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01453.x

PRESTON, D.R. 2010. Language, people, salience, space: Perceptual dialectology and language regard. Dilectologia 5. 87–131.

PRICE, M.D. 1996. The Venezuelan Andes and the geographical imagination. Geographical Review 86. (3): 334–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/215498

PUDUP, M.B. 1988. Arguments within regional geography. Progress in Human Geography 12. (3): 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913258801200303

RAAGMAA, G. 2002. Regional identity in regional development and planning. European Planning Studies 10. (1):55–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120099263

REED, J.S. 1976. The heart of dixie: An essay in folk geography. Social Forces 54. (4): 925–939. https://doi.org/10.2307/2576184

REED, J.S., KOHLS, J. and HANCHETTE, C. 1990. The dissolution of dixie and the changing shape of the South. Social Forces 69. (1): 221–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579615

REINBACHER, I., BENKERT, M., VAN KREVELD, M., MITCHELL, J.S.B. and WOLFF, A. 2008. Delineating boundaries for imprecise regions. Algorithmica 50. 386–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-007-9042-5

SCHLEMPER, M.B. and PANOZZO, K.A. 2020. Identity, social interaction, and networks in the region of Wisconsin’s Holyland. Journal of Cultural Geography 37. (2): 184–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2020.1731226

SEMIAN, M. 2012. Searching for the territorial shape of a region in regional consciousness: The Český ráj (Bohemian Paradise), Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports 20. (2): 25–35.

SHORTRIDGE, J.R. 1980. Vernacular regions in Kansas. American Studies 21. (1): 73–94.

SHORTRIDGE, J.R. 1985. The vernacular Middle West. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 75. (1): 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1985.tb00057.x

SHORTRIDGE, J.R. 1987. Changing usage of four American regional labels. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77. (3): 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00162.x

SIMON, C., HUIGEN, P. and GROOTE, P. 2010. Analysing regional identities in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 101. (4): 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00564.x

SINNHUBER, K.A. 1954. Central Europe – Mitteleuropa – Europe Centrale: An analysis of a geographical term. Transactions and Papers of the Institute of British Geographers 20. 15–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/621131

SIWEK, T. and KAŇOK, J. 2000. Consciousness of Silesian Identity in the Mental Map. Ostrava, Ostravská univerzita.

STACHOWSKI, K. 2017. An experiment in labelling draw-a-map maps. Studies in Polish Linguistics 12. (4): 221–240. https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.17.011.8243

STAUT, M., KOVAČIČ, G. and OGRIN, D. 2007. The spatial cognition of Mediterranean in Slovenia: (In)consistency between perception and physical definitions. Acta geographica Slovenica 47. (1): 105–131. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS47105

STOFFELEN, A., KAMMINGA, O., GROOTE, P., MEIJLES, E., WEITKAMP, G. and HOVING, A. 2024. Making use of sense of place in amalgamated municipalities. Regional & Federal Studies 34. (4): 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2022.2161526

SUBLETT, M.D. 2021. Corn Belt as an enterprise-naming custom in the United States. Names: A Journal of Onomastics 69. (4): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5195/names.2021.2254

ŠERÝ, M. and ŠIMÁČEK, P. 2012. Perception of the historical border between Moravia and Silesia by residents of Jeseník area as a partial aspect of their regional identity (Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports 20. (2): 36–46.

ŠIFTA, M. and CHROMÝ, P. 2017. The importance of symbols in the region formation process. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography 71. (2): 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2017.1317285

ŠTIKA, J. 1961. Rozšíření karpatské salašnické kultury na Moravě (The spread of Carpathian shepherd culture in Moravia). Český lid 48. (3): 99–105.

TANDARIĆ, N., MAČEK, M., CVITANOVIĆ, M., TEKIĆ, I., FLEGAR, M., OKMACA, A. and TVRDOJEVIĆ, J. 2013. Spatial cognition of the Mediterranean in Croatia. Geoadria 18. (2): 181–197. https://doi.org/10.15291/geoadria.233

THRIFT, N. 1983. On the determination of social action in space and time. Environment and Planning D 1. (1): 23–57. https://doi.org/10.1068/d010023

TRICCO, A.C., LILLIE, E., ZARIN, W., O’BRIEN, K.K., COLQUHOUN, H., LEVAC, D., MOHER, D., PETERS, M.D.J., HORSLEY, T., WEEKS, L., HEMPEL, S., AKL, E.A., CHANG, C., MCGOWAN, J., STEWART, L., HARTLING, L., ALDCROFT, A., WILSON, M.G., GARRITTY, C., LEWIN, S., GODFREY, C.M., MACDONALD, M., LANGLOIS, E.V., SOARES-WEISER, K., MORIARTY, J., CLIFFORD, T., TUNCALP, Ö. and STRAUS, S.E. 2018. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine 169. (7): 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

ULACK, R. and RAITZ, K. 1981. Appalachia: A comparison of the cognitive and Appalachian Regional Commission regions. Southeastern Geographer 21. (1): 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.1981.0003

VAISHAR, A. and ZAPLETALOVÁ, J. 2016. Regional identities of Czech historical lands. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 65. (1): 15–25. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.65.1.2

VUKOSAV, B. 2011. Geographic name Zagora and its reference to areas in the Dalmatian hinterland in the selected newspaper medium. Geoadria 16. (2): 261–281. https://doi.org/10.15291/geoadria.289

VUKOSAV, B. 2015. Perception of the spatial extent of the Zagora region in selected cartographic sources. Kartografija i geoinformacije 14. (23): 20–36.

VUKOSAV, B. and FUERST-BJELIŠ, B. 2015. Media perception of spatial identities: Constructing an imaginative map of Dalmatian interior. Geoadria 20. (1): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.15291/geoadria.29

VUKOSAV, B. and FUERST-BJELIŠ, B. 2016. Labels of interest groups as indicators of a vernacular region: A case study in Croatia. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 107. (4): 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12168

WEAKLIEM, D. and BIGGERT, R. 1999. Region and political opinion in the contemporary United States. Social Forces 77. (3): 868–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/3005964

WEAVER, R. and HOLTKAMP, C. 2015. Determinants of Appalachian identity: Using vernacular traces to study cultural geographies of an American region. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106. (1): 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1090266

ZAGA, M. and WAISEL, T.Y. 2023. Mapping the Middle East: Israeli student’s geographical knowledge and perceptions. Journal of Borderlands Studies 39. (5): 931–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2023.2255191

ZDORKOWSKI, R.T. and CARNEY, G.O. 1985. This land is my land: Oklahoma’s changing vernacular regions. Journal of Cultural Geography 5. (2): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873638509478552

ZELINSKY, W. 1980. North America’s vernacular regions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70. (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01293.x

ZIMMERBAUER, K. 2011. From image to identity: Building regions by place promotion. European Planning Studies 19. (2): 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.532667

ZIMMERBAUER, K., RIUKULEHTO, S. and SUUTARI, T. 2017. Killing the regional Leviathan? Deinstitutionalization and stickiness of regions. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41. (4): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12547

Published
2025-04-01
How to Cite
BartůněkM., & MarekP. (2025). Territorial identity of a region: A review of data collection techniques. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 74(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.74.1.3
Section
Articles