Comparison of pipette method and state of the art analytical techniques to determine granulometric properties of sediments and soils
Abstract
The determination of particle size distribution is a crucial issue in various fields of earth sciences (e.g., Quaternary research, sedimentology, stratigraphy, structural geology, volcanology), environmental sciences as well as diverse industrial applications (e.g., pharmaceuticals, cement industry). New measurement techniques developed as a result of industrial demands have also gained ground in environmental and Earth sciences research. The new techniques (especially laser diffraction) have enabled the particle characterisation in the broader size-range with a more detailed resolution. Still, they have to be compared with data obtained by classical methods. In light of the above, the primary aim of our research is to examine the methods of particle size determination critically. Excessive oversimplifications of particle size analyses routinely have used in paleo-environmental and paleo-climatological reconstructions, and other sedimentary studies, as well as insufficient knowledge of the background of the applied methods, distort the interpretation of the results. Over the past four decades, laser diffraction particle size analysers have proven to be practical tools of particle size characterisation. However, the shape of the natural sediment and soil particles are irregular and, therefore, affects the particle size distribution results obtained by different methods. The results of the traditional pipette method differed from laser diffraction results. The presence or absence of the pretreatments did control the differences between the two techniques. The results of Fraunhofer optical method were significantly different from Mie theory because it can detect much lower volume percentages of finer particles. Grain size results of coarse-grained samples measured by different laser diffraction devices were more comparable than the results of more clayey samples. The ratios of different sizes were changed due to the hydrochloric acid and hydrogen peroxide pretreatments. The comparison of different techniques is necessary to revaluate standards in grain size measurements which can enable the shift from conventional methods to more productive and reproducible methods. Still, light scattering techniques have not yet been able to displace classical methods in Earth sciences completely, in contrast to industrial applications.References
Bayvel, L.P. and Jones, A.R. 1981. Electromagnetic scattering and its applications. Applied Science, London, Englewood N.J. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6746-8
Beuselinck, L., Govers, G., Poesen, J., Degraer, G. and Froyen, L. 1998. Grain-size analysis by laser diffractometry: comparison with the sieve-pipette method. Catena 32. (3-4): 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(98)00051-4
Blott, S.J. and Pye, K. 2006. Particle size distribution analysis of sand-sized particles by laser diffraction: an experimental investigation of instrument sensitivity and the effects of particle shape. Sedimentology 53. (3): 671-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2006.00786.x
Campbell, G.S. and Shiozawa, S. 1992. Prediction of hydraulic properties of soils using particle-size distribution and bulk density data. In Indirect methods for estimating the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils. Eds.: van Genuchten, M.T., Leij, F.J.and Lund, L.J., Riverside, University of California, 317-328.
Centeri, Cs., Jakab, G., Szabó, Sz., Farsang, A., Barta, K., Szalai, Z. and Bíró, Zs. 2015a. Comparison of particle-size analysing laboratory methods. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 14. (5): 1125-1135. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2015.123
Centeri, Cs., Szalai, Z., Jakab, G., Barta, K., Farsang, A., Szabó, Sz. and Bíró, Zs. 2015b. Soil erodibility calculations based on different particle size distribution measurements. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64. (1): 17-23. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.64.1.2
Cox, M.R. and Budhu, M. 2008. A practical approach to grain shape quantification. Engineering Geology 96. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.05.005
de Boer, G.B.J., de Weerd, C., Thoenes, D. and Goossens, H.W.J. 1987. Laser diffraction spectrometry: Fraunhofer versus Mie scattering. Particle Characterisation 4. (1-4): 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.19870040104
di Stefano, C., Ferro, V. and Mirabile, S. 2010. Comparison between grain-size analyses using laser diffraction and sedimentation methods. Biosystem Engineering 106. (2): 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.03.013
Eshel, G., Levy, G.J., Mingelgrin, U. and Singer, M.J.2004. Critical evaluation of use of laser diffraction for particle-size distribution analyses. Soil Science Society of America 68. 736-743. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.7360
Gee, G.W. and Or, D. 2002. Particle size analysis. In Soil science society of America book series, Vol. 5. Methods of soil analysis, Part 4. Physical methods. Eds.: Dane, J.H. and Topp, G.C., Madison, WI, 255-293. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c12
Király, Cs., Falus, Gy., Gresina, F., Jakab, G., Szalai, Z., and Varga, Gy. 2019. Granulometric properties of particles in Upper Miocene sandstones from thin sections, Szolnok Formation, Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 68. (4): 341-353. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.68.4.2
Konert, M. and Vandenberghe, J. 1997. Comparison of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: a solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction. Sedimentology 44. 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3091.1997.d01-38.x
Loizeau, J.L., Arbouille, D., Santiago, S. and Vernet, J.P. 1994. Evaluation of a wide range laser diffrac-tion grain size analyser for use with sediments. Sedimentology 41. 353-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1994.tb01410.x
McCave, N. and Syvitski, J.P.M. 1991. Principles and methods of geological particle size analysis. In Principles, methods and application of particle size analyses. Ed.: Syvitski, J.P.M., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626142.003
Moss, A.J. 1966. Origin, shaping and significance of quartz sand grains. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia 13. 97-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167616608728607
Pieri, L., Bittelli, M. and Pisa Rossi, P. 2006. Laser diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and image analysis to evaluate a bimodal Gaussian model for particle size distribution in soils. Geoderma 135. 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.11.009
Polakowski, C., Sochan, A., Bieganowsky, A., Ryzak, M., Földényi, R. and Tóth, J. 2014. Influence of the sand particle shape on particle size distribution measured by laser diffraction method. International Agrophysics 28. (2): 195-200. https://doi.org/10.2478/intag-2014-0008
Rogers, C.D.F. and Smalley, I.J. 1993. The shape of loess particles. Naturwissenschaften 80. 461-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01136036
Sneed, E.D. and Folk, R.L. 1958. Pebbles in Lower Colorado River, Texas: a study in particle morphogenesis. Journal of Geology 66. (2): 114-150. https://doi.org/10.1086/626490
Switzer, A.D. 2013. Measuring and analysing particle size in a geomorphic context. In Treatise on Geomorphology 14. Methods in geomorphology. Eds.: Shroder, J., Switzer, A.D. and Kennedy, D.M., San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 224-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00385-7
Syvitski, J.P.M., Leblanc, K.W. and Asprey, K.W. 1991. Interlaboratory, instrument calibration experiment. In Principles, methods and application of particle size analyses. Ed.: Syvitski, J.P.M., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 174-193. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626142.016
Újvári, G., Kok, J.F., Varga, Gy. and Kovács, J. 2016. The physics of wind-blown loess: Implications for grain size proxy interpretations in Quaternary paleoclimate studies. Earth-Science Reviews 154. 247-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.01.006
Udvardi, B., Kovacs, I.J., Fancsik, T., Konya, P., Batori, M., Stercel, F., Falus, G. and Szalai, Z. 2017. Effects of particle size on the attenuated total reflection spectrum of minerals. Applied Spectroscopy 71. (6): 1157-1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003702816670914
Varga, Gy. and Roettig, C.-B. 2018. Identification of Saharan dust particles in Pleistocene dune sand-paleosol sequences of Fuerteventura (Canary Islands). Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 67. (2): 121-141. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.67.2.2
Varga, Gy., Kovács, J., Szalai, Z., Cserháti, C. and Újvári, G. 2018. Granulometric characterisation of paleosols in loess series by automated static image analysis. Sedimentary Geology 370. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2018.04.001
Varga, Gy., Újvári, G. and Kovács, J. 2019a. Interpretation of sedimentary (sub)populations extracted from grain size distributions of Central European loess-paleosol series. Quaternary International 502. 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.09.021
Varga, Gy., Gresina, F., Újvári, G., Kovács, J. and Szalai, Z. 2019b. On the reliability and comparability of laser diffraction grain size measurements of paleosols in loess records. Sedimentary Geology 389. 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2019.05.011
Copyright (c) 2020 Fruzsina Gresina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
