Polycentric urban development in post-socialist context: the case of the Budapest Metropolitan Region
Abstract
Even though the concept of polycentric urban development has been high on the agenda in the literature it has rarely come to the fore in academic papers dealing with the postsocialist cities. The main aim of this paper is to analyse the evolving polycentric pattern of urban development in the metropolitan region of Budapest. For the purpose of study we use commuting data of the 1990, 2001 and 2011 national census. The rapid transformation of Budapest after 1989 the re-establishment of market mechanisms, the privatisation of housing, the liberalisation of the property market, and the growing re-integration of the city to the world economy aff ected not only the core city but also the metropolitan periphery.
The previously rather homogeneous structure of the metropolitan periphery experienced significant changes in the course of the transformation. The advantages of location, which had been insignificant during the state-socialist period, once again became truly beneficial which resulted in growing disparities in the metropolitan periphery. Since 1990 the functional interplay, cooperation, interdependence as well as physical infrastructural linkages between Budapest and its metropolitan zone have been further intensified. Residential suburbanisation and the suburbanisation of business activities led to new flows of commuting within the metropolitan region. Our findings show that the reallocation of urban functions took place in the wider metropolitan zone of Budapest among existing centres, which fits to the European version of post-suburbanisation concept rather than the US one.
References
Albrechts, L. 2001. How to proceed from image and discourse to action: as applied to the Flemish Diamond. Urban Studies 38. (4): 733-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035312
Anas, A., Arnott, R. and Small, K. 1998. Urban Spatial Structure. Journal of Economic Literature 36. (3): 1426-1464.
Axenov, K., Brade, I. and Bondarchuk, E. 2006. The transformation of urban space in post-Soviet Russia. London, Routledge, 196 p.
Bailey, N. and Turok, I. 2001. Central Scotland as a polycentric urban region: useful planning concept or chimera. Urban Studies 38. (4): 697-715. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035295
Bontje, M. 2001. Dealing with deconcentration: population deconcentration and planning response in polynucleated urban regions in North-west Europe. Urban Studies 38. (4): 769-785. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035330
Bontje, M. and Burdack, J. 2011. Post-suburbia in continental Europe. In International perspectives on suburbanization. A post-suburban world? Eds. Phelps, N. and Wu, F., Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230308626_8
Bontje, M. and Kepsu, K. 2013. Creative knowledge strategies for polycentric city-regions. In Place-making and Policies for Competitive Cities. Eds. Musterd, S. and Kovács, Z., Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118554579.ch12
Brade, I., Herfert, G. and Wiest, K. 2009. Recent trends and future prospects of sociospatial differentiation in urban regions of Central and Eastern Europe: A lull before the storm? Cities 26. (5): 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.05.001
Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. 2002. Cities and the Geographies of "Actually Existing Neoliberalism". Antipode 34. (3): 349-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00246
Burger, M. and Me?ers, E. 2012. Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban Studies 49. (5): 1127-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011407095
Champion, A.G. 2001. A changing demographic regime and evolving polycentric urban regions: Consequences for the size, composition and distribution of city populations. Urban Studies 38. (4): 657-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035277
Crilley, D. 1993. Megastructures and urban change: aesthetics, ideology and design. In The restless urban landscape. Ed. Knox, P.L., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 131-164.
Davoudi, S. 2003. Polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to anormative agenda. European Planning Studies 11. (8): 979-999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431032000146169
De Goei, B., Burger, M., Van Oort, F. and Kitson, M. 2010. Functional polycentrism and urban network development in the Greater South East, United Kingdom: evidence from commuting patterns, 1981-2001. Regional Studies 44. (9): 1149-1170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903365102
Dövényi, Z. and Kovács, Z. 2006. Budapest: Post-socialist metropolitan periphery between 'catching up' and individual development path. European Spatial Research and Policy 13. (2): 23-41.
Duranton, G. and Puga, D. 2004. Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 4. Eds. Henderson, V.J. and Thisse, J-F., Oxford, Elsevier, 2063-2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1
Faludi, A. 2004. The European Spatial Development Perspective and North-West Europe: application and the future. European Planning Studies 12. (3): 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000195010
Finka, M. 2009. Sustainable territorial development and concepts of polycentricity in Slovak territorial development. Urban Research and Practice 2. (3): 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535060903319319
Fujita, M., Krugman, P. and Venables, A.J. 2000. The spatial economy - cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 367 p. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001
Garreau, J. 1992. Edge city. Life on the new frontier. New York, Anchor Books, 548 p.
Gentile, M., Tammaru, T. and Van Kempen, R. 2012. Heteropolitanization: Social and spatial change in Central and Eastern European cities. Cities 29. (5): 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.005
Hall, P. 1993. Forces shaping urban Europe. Urban Studies 30. (6): 883-898. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989320080831
Hall, P. 2009. Polycentricity. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Eds. Kitchin, R. and Thrift, N., Oxford, Elsevier, 260-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00857-9
Hall, P. and Pain, K. 2006. From metropolis to polyopolis. In The Polycentric Metropolis. Learning from mega-city regions in Europe. Eds. Hall, P. and Pain, K., Oxford, Earthscan, 3-16.
Harvey, D. 1978. The Urban Process Under Capitalism: A Framework for Analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2. (1-4): 101-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1978.tb00738.x
Keil, R. and Young, D. 2011. Post-suburbia and the city-region politics. In International perspectives of suburbanization. A post-suburban world? Eds. Phelps, N.A. and Wu, F., Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 54-78. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230308626_4
Knox, P. L. 2008. Metroburbia, USA. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 231 p.
Kok, H. and Kovács, Z. 1999. The process of suburbanization in the agglomeration of Budapest. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 14. (2): 119-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496818
Kovács, Z. and Tosics, I. 2014. Urban Sprawl on the Danube: The Impacts of Suburbanization in Budapest. In Confronting Suburbanization: Urban Decentralization in Postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe. Eds. Stanilov, K. and Sýkora, L., Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 33-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118295861.ch2
Krugman P. 2000. Where in the world is the new economic geography. In The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Eds. Clark, G.L., Fedman, M.P. and Gertler, M.S., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 49-60.
Leetmaa, K. and Tammaru, T. 2007. Suburbanization in countries in transition: destination of suburbanizers in the Tallinn Metropolitan Area. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography 89. (2): 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00244.x
Lehrer, U.A. 1994. The Image of the Periphery: The Architecture of FlexSpace. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 12. (2): 187-205. https://doi.org/10.1068/d120187
Logan, J.R. and Swanstrom, T. 2005. Urban Restructuring: A Critical View. In Cities and society. Ed. Kleniewski, N., Oxford, Blackwell, 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752814.ch3
Maier, K. 2009. Polycentric development in the spatial development policy of the Czech Republic. Urban Research and Practice 2. (3): 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535060903319285
Malmberg, A. 2009. Agglomeration. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Eds. Kitchin, R. and Thrift, N., Oxford, Elsevier, 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00131-0
Ouredniček, M. 2007. Differential suburban development in the Prague urban region. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography 89. (2): 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00243.x
Peet, R. and Hartwick, E. 2009. Theories of Development. Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives. London, Guilford Press, 324 p.
Phelps, N. and Wu, F. 2011. Introduction. In International perspectives of suburbanization. A postsuburban world? Eds. Phelps, N.A. and Wu, F., Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230308626_1
Pichler-Milanović, N. 2014. Confronting Suburbanization in Ljubljana: From "Urbanization of the Countryside" to Urban Sprawl. In Confronting Suburbanization: Urban Decentralization in Post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe. Eds. Stanilov, K. and Sýkora, L., Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 65-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118295861.ch3
Radvánszky, Á. 2009. Old wine in a new bott le? The Hungarian approach to polycentric territorial development. Urban Research and Practice 2. (3): 308-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535060903319244
Rosenthal, S.S. and Strange, W. 2004. Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 4. Eds. Henderson, V. J. and Thisse, J-F., Oxford, Elsevier, 2119-2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3
Sassen, S. 2001. Global cities and global city-regions. In Global city-regions. Ed. Scott, A.J., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 78-95.
Scott, A.J., Agnew, J., Soja, E. and Storper, M. 2001. Global city-regions. In Global city-regions. Ed. Scott, A.J., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 11-30.
Smith, N. 1982. Gentrifi cation and Uneven Development. Economic Geography 58. (2): 139-155. https://doi.org/10.2307/143793
Soja, E.W. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Oxford, Blackwell, 348 p.
Stanilov, K. and Sýkora, L. eds. 2014. Confronting suburbanization: urban decentralization in postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 333 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118295861
Sýkora, L. 2009. Post-Socialist Cities. In International Encyclpedia of Human Geography. Eds. Kitchin, R. and Thrift, N., Oxford, Elsevier, 387-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.01072-5
Vandermotten, C., Halbert, L., Roelandts, M. and Cornut, P. 2008. European planning and the polycentric consensus: wishful thinking? Regional Studies 42. (8): 1205-1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701874206
Volgmann, K. 2012. Neue Kerne in metropolitanen Räume - Polyzentrische Strukturen und Funktionen in Metropolraum Rhein-Ruhr. In Polyzentrale Stadtregionen - die Region als planerische Handlungsraum. Hrsg. Growe, A., Heider, K., Lamker, C., Passlick, S. and Terfrüchte, T., Hannover, Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, Forschungsbericht 3.
Copyright (c) 2014 Tünde Szabó, Balázs Szabó, Zoltán Kovács
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
