The diagnostic continua of the soils of Europe
Abstract
Diagnostic horizons, properties and materials are commonly applied building units of national and international soil classification systems. The presence, depth or absence of diagnostic information supports the process of objective soil classification, such as the World Reference Base (WRB). While the diagnostic units and associated descriptive qualifiers convey information that reflect pedogenesis, they also indicate important, and often complex properties that are related to soil fertility and other soil functions. The spatial extent or the continuum of diagnostic information is often different from the spatial extent of the mapping units in general soil maps (mostly reflecting soil types). This paper presents the spatial distribution of selected diagnostic units and qualifiers for the European Union and describes their significance for key soil functions. The derivation of selected diagnostics was performed based on the information provided in the European Soil Database and by taking into consideration the definitions, rules and allocation procedure of soils to the appropriate Reference Soil Group (RSG) defined by the WRB key. The definition of the presence/absence of the diagnostic units were performed by extracting information related to the first level of the WRB classification and to the qualifiers provided by the ESDB on the Soil Taxonomic Units (STU) level. The areal percentage of the STUs (thus, the derived diagnostics) within Soil Mapping Units (SMUs) was calculated and was visualized on separate maps. The study demonstrated the importance of the spatial information that the diagnostic elements convey, especially related to soil functions.References
Anthony, T.L. and Silver, W.L. 2021. Hot moments drive extreme nitrous oxide and methane emissions from agricultural peatlands. Global Change Biology 27. (20): 5141-5153. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15802
Avery, B.W. 1983. Argillic horizons and their significance in England and Wales. In Soils and Quaternary Landscape Evolution. Ed.: Boardman, J., New York, John Wiley & Sons, 69-86.
Batjes, N.H. 1996. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science 47. 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x
Bockheim, J.G. and Hartemink, A.E. 2013. Distribution and classification of soils with clay-enriched horizons in the USA. Geoderma 209-210. 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.009
Bouma, J., Broll, G., Crane, T.A., Dewitte, O., Gardi, C., Schulte, R.P.O. and Towers, W. 2012. Soil information in support of policy making and awareness raising. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4. (5): 552-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.07.001
Bridges, E.M. 1997. World Soils. Third edition. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
Deckers, J., Spaargaren, O., Nachtergaele, F., Berding, F., Ahrens, R., Micheli, E. and Schad, P. 2005. Rationale for the key and the qualifiers of the WRB 2006. Eurasian Soil Science 38. (2005) Suppl. 1. 6-12.
Dobos, E., Vadnai, P., Kovács, K., Láng, V., Fuchs, M. and Michéli, E. 2019. A novel approach for mapping WRB soil units - A methodology for a global SOTER coverage. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 68. (2): 157-175. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.68.2.4
European Commission 2006. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions - Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection (COM 2006. 231). Brussels, Commission of the European Communities.
FAO 1998. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. World Soil Resources Report 84. Rome, FAO.
FAO 2001a. Lecture Notes on the Major Soils of the World (with CD-ROM). Eds.: Driessen, P., Deckers, J., Spaargaren, O. and Nachtergaele, F., World Soil Resources Report No. 94. Rome, FAO.
FAO 2001b. Major Soils of the World. Land and Water Digital Media Series No. 19. Rome, FAO.
Haygarth, P.M. and Ritz, K. 2009. The future of soils and land use in the UK: soil systems for the provision of land-based ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 26. 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.016
IUSS Working Group WRB 2006. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. Rome, FAO.
IUSS Working Group WRB 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. Update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. Rome, FAO.
Jobbágy, E.G. and Jackson, R.B. 2000. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological Applications 10. 423-436. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:TVDOSO]2.0.CO;2
Jones, A., Montanarella, L. and Jones, R. 2005. Soil Atlas of Europe. European Soil Bureau Network. Luxemburg, European Commission. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Lal, R. 2000. World cropland soils as a source or sink for atmospheric carbon. Advances in Agronomy 71. 145-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71014-0
Lal, R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032
Michéli, E., Csorba, Á., Szegi, T., Dobos, E. and Fuchs, M. 2019. The soil types of the modernized, diagnostic based Hungarian Soil Classification System and their correlation with the World reference base for soil resources. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 68. (2): 109-117. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.68.2.1
Monger, H.C. and Gallegos, R.A. 2000. Biotic and abiotic processes and rates of pedogenic carbonate accumulation in the south-western United States - relationship to atmospheric CO2 sequestration. In Global Climate Change and Pedogenic Carbonates. Eds.: Lal, R., Kimble, J.M., Eswaran, H. and Stewart, B.A., Boca Raton, FL, CRC/Lewis, 273-289.
Nordt, L.C., Wilding, L.P. and Drees, L.R. 2000. Pedogenic carbonate transformations in leaching soil systems; implications for the global carbon cycle. In Global Climate Change and Pedogenic Carbonates. Eds.: Lal, R., Kimble, J.M., Eswaran, H. and Stewart, B.A., Boca Raton, FL, CRC/Lewis, 43-64.
Panagos, P. 2006. The European soil database. GEOconnexion 5. (7): 32-33.
Richter, A., O'Huallacháin, D., Doyle, E., Clipson, N., van Leeuwen, J.P., Heuvelink, G.B. and Creamer, R.E. 2018. Linking diagnostic features to soil microbial biomass and respiration in agricultural grassland soil: A large-scale study in Ireland. European Journal of Soil Science 69. 414-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12551
Sauerbeck, D.R. 2001. CO2 emissions and C sequestration by agriculture - perspectives and limitations. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 60. 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012617516477
Schlesinger, W.H. 2000. Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry 48. 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006247623877
Schulte, R.P., Creamer, R.E., Donnellan, T., Farrelly, N., Fealy, R., O'Donoghue, C. and O'Huallacháin, D. 2014. Functional land management: A framework for managing soil-based ecosystem services for the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Environmental Science and Policy 38. 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.002
Torres-Sallan, G., Schulte, R.P.O., Lanigan, G.J., Byrne, K.A., Reidy, B., Simó, I. and Six, J. 2017. Clay illuviation provides a long-term sink for C sequestration in subsoils. Scientific Reports 7. 45635. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45635
Van Leeuwen, J.P., Saby, N.P.A., Jones, A., Louwagie, G., Michéli, E., Rutgers, M., Schulte, R.P.O., Spiegel, H., Toth, G. and Creamer, R.E. 2017. Gap assessment in current soil monitoring networks across Europe for measuring soil functions. Environmental Research Letters 12. (12): art. no. 124007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9c5c
Copyright (c) 2022 Ádám Csorba, Arwyn Jones, Tamás Szegi, Endre Dobos, Erika Michéli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
