Hallgatói eredményesség és tanulási támogatás vizsgálata egy operációkutatás kurzusban

  • Tamás Bertalan Budapesti Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem, Folyamatmenedzsment Tanszék, Pénzügy és Számvitel Kar https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4000-3066
  • Bálint Nagy Dunaújvárosi Egyetem, Matematika és Számítástudományi Tanszék, Informatikai Intézet; Óbudai Egyetem, Természettudományi Tanszék, Elektrofizikai Intézet, Kandó Kálmán Villamosmérnöki Kar https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0427-0959
Keywords: Higher education, mathematics education, operations research, student success

Abstract

In higher education mathematics courses, examining pedagogical factors influencing student performance is of particular importance. This study analyzes the teaching experiences and student performance related to the Operations Research 1 course among business informatics students at a university in the capital city. The research applies both quantitative and qualitative methods: in addition to analyzing student performance, course evaluations and student feedback were also examined. Based on the results, it can be concluded that practice-oriented teaching, a trans­parent assessment system, and instructor support significantly contribute to student achievement and motivation. Personal conversations with students also revealed that generative artificial intelligence tools have now become a natural part of the learning process. Therefore, the study emphasizes that in future learning analytics research, alongside traditional LMS data, the analysis of AI usage may also play an increasingly important role in predicting student success and in the development of adaptive educational support.

References

Xepapadeas, A. (2005): Economic growth and the environment. Handbook of environmental economics, 3., pp. 1219–1271.

Bouali, S.–Buscarino, A.–Fortuna, L.–Frasca, M.–Gambuzza, L. V. (2012): Emulating complex business cycles by using an electronic analogue. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 13., (6.), pp. 2459–2465.

Landgärds-Tarvoll, I. (2024): Understanding the challenges of the secondary-tertiary transition in mathematics for economics in higher education: a literature review. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 43., (4.), pp. 251–272.

Tularam, G. A. (2013): Mathematics in finance and economics: importance of teaching higher order mathematical thinking skills in finance. E-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 7., (1.), pp. 43–73.

Böhm, M.–Barkmann, J.–Eggert, S.–Carstensen, C. H.– Bögeholz, S. (2020): Quantitative modelling and perspective taking: Two competencies of decision making for sustainable development. Sustainability, 12., (17.).

Bell, P. C.–Haehling von Lanzenauer, C. (2000): Teaching objectives: the value of using cases in teaching operational research. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51., (12.), pp. 1367–1377.

Morgan, M. S.– Knuuttila, T. (2012): Models and modelling in economics. Philosophy of economics, 13., pp. 49–87.

Rai, B. K.–So, C. K.–Nicholas, A. (2012): A primer on mathematical modelling in economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26., pp. 594–615.

Takács A. M.–Takács A. (2026): Az élményalapú felsőfokú matematika oktatásában alkalmazott módszerek. Dunakavics, 14., (4.), pp. 35–48.

Sweller, J. (1988): Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12., (2)., pp. 257–285.

Okada, R. (2023), Effects of Perceived Autonomy Support on Academic Achievement and Motivation Among Higher Education Students: A Meta-Analysis. Jpn Psychol Res, 65., pp. 230–242.

Williams, A. (2024): Delivering Effective Student Feedback in Higher Education: An Evaluation of the Challenges and Best Practice. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 10., (2.), pp. 473–501.

Kocsó, E. (2023): The Possible Framework for Examining Student Performance. Journal of Applied Technical and Educational Sciences, 13., (3.).

Márquez, L.–Henríquez, V.–Chevreux, H.–Scheihing, E.–Guerra, J. (2024): Adoption of learning analytics in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55., (2.), pp. 439–459.

Rodríguez-Ortiz, M. Á.– Santana-Mancilla, P. C.– Anido-Rifón, L. E. (2025): Machine Learning and Generative AI in Learning Analytics for Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Models, Trends, and Challenges. Appl. Sci. 15.,

Published
2026-06-15
How to Cite
BertalanT., & NagyB. (2026). Hallgatói eredményesség és tanulási támogatás vizsgálata egy operációkutatás kurzusban. Dunakavics, 14(7), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.63684/dk.2026.07.01
Section
Cikkek