The interaction between corporate control and absorptive capacity in the supplier integration of domestic firms

  • Tamás Vasvári Pécsi Tudományegyetem Közgazdaságtudományi Kar Gazdaságtudományi Kiválósági Központ
  • Dóra Longauer Pécsi Tudományegyetem Közgazdaságtudományi Kar Kvantitatív Menedzsment Intézet
Keywords: global value chains, multinational enterprises, absorptive capacity, corporate control, supplier integration

Abstract

This paper investigates the interplay between multinational enterprises’ (MNEs) corporate control and the absorptive capacity of domestic firms in supplier integration, using the case of a German-owned manufacturing subsidiary in Hungary. The analysis explores whether the low share of Hungarian suppliers in the company’s procurement structure is primarily attributable to the limited autonomy of the subsidiary or to the weaker capabilities of domestic suppliers. Using procurement data from 2015–2019 complemented by financial and firm-level indicators, logistic regression and propensity score matching techniques were applied. The results show that domestic suppliers tend to be smaller, less productive, and offer lower wages than their foreign-­owned counterparts. However, even after controlling for these characteristics, foreign-owned suppliers are significantly more likely to deliver complex products, reflecting a structural bias in favour of external suppliers and a highly centralized corporate governance system. Consequently, the dual structure of the Hungarian economy is not only the result of domestic firms’ limited capabilities but also of the organizational design of MNEs. The findings underline the need for economic policies that, beyond strengthening local absorptive capacities, encourage deeper local embeddedness and greater procurement autonomy of subsidiaries.

References

Alfaro, L., & Chen, M. X. (2013). Market reallocation and knowledge spillover: The gains from multinational production (Working Papers, 2013-13). The George Washington University Institute for International Economic Policy. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14512371

Altenburg, T. (2000). Linkages and spillovers between transnational corporations and small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries: Opportunities and policies (Reports and Working Papers, 5). German Development Institute.

Antalóczy, K., Gáspár, T., & Sass, M. (2021). A gyógyszeripari értéklánc sajátosságai Ma-gyarországon. Közgazdasági Szemle, 68(6), 645–673. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2021.6.645

Bakács, A., Czakó, V., & Sass, M. (2006). Beszállítók és hálózatosodás: az Electrolux Lehel Kft. példája. Külgazdaság, 50(7–8), 44–59.

Békés, G., Kleinert, J., & Toubal, F. (2006). Spillovers from multinationals to heterogeneous domestic firms: Evidence from Hungary (Working Papers MT-DP, 2006/16). MTA KRTK KTI.

Beugelsdijk, S., & Jindra, B. (2018). Product innovation and decision-making autonomy in subsidiaries of multinational companies. Journal of World Business, 53(4), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.02.007

Bisztray, M. (2016). The effect of FDI on local suppliers: Evidence from Audi in Hungary (Working Papers MT-DP, 2016/22). MTA KRTK KTI.

Bloom, N., Schankerman, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica, 81(4), 1347–1393. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9466

Braun, E., & Sebestyén, T. (2025). Szerkezeti változások és függőségek. Magyarország helyzete a globális értékláncokban. Közgazdasági Szemle, 72(9–10), 805–841. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2025.0.805

Crespo, N., & Fontoura, M. P. (2007). Determinant factors of FDI spillovers – what do we really know? World Development, 35(3), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.04.001

De Jong, G., van Dut, V., Jindra, B., & Marek, P. (2015). Does country context distance determine subsidiary decision-making autonomy? Theory and evidence from European transition economies. International Business Review, 24(5), 874–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.04.003

Eurostat. (2022). Annual enterprise statistics for special aggregates of activities. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sbs_na_sca_r2/default/table

Eurostat. (2025). Enterprises by detailed NACE Rev. 2 activity and special aggregates. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sbs_ovw_act/default/table

Gereffi, G., & Fernandez-Stark, K. (2016). Global value chain analysis: A primer (2nd ed.). https://hdl.handle.net/10161/12488

Görg, H., & Greenaway, D. (2004). Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really ben-efit from foreign direct investment? World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/427101468323055089

Gurály, R. (2024). Made or invented in Hungary? Köz-Gazdaság, 19(2), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.14267/RETP2024.02.03

Halpern, L., & Muraközy, B. (2007). Does distance matter in spillover? Economics of Transi-tion, 15(4), 781–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2007.00308.x

Hegedűs, D., & Vasvári, T. (2020). Hazai vállalatok az értékláncban. Egy feldolgozóipari vállalat beszállítói kapcsolatainak elemzése. Közgazdasági Szemle, 67(12), 1245–1270. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2020.12.1245

Hewitt-Dundas, N., Andréosso-O’Callaghan, B., Crone, M., & Roper, S. (2005). Know­ledge transfers from multinational plants in Ireland: A cross-border comparison of sup-ply-chain linkages. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776405048498

Humphrey, J. (2000). Assembler-supplier relations in the auto industry: Globalisation and national development. Competition & Change, 4(3), 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/

Humphrey, J. (2004). Upgrading in global value chains. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.908214

Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect up-grading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/

Hungarian Investment Promotion Agency (2016). Direkt beszállítói kézikönyv. HIPA.

Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5–86. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.1.5

Jindra, B., Giroud, A., & Scott-Kennel, J. (2009). Subsidiary roles, vertical linkages and economic development: Lessons from transition economies. Journal of World Business, 44(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2008.05.006

Józsa, V. (2024). Made and/or invented in Hungary? The transformation of the Hungarian investment promotion system from the change of regime to our days with special respect to the VIP cash subsidy system. Tér és Társadalom, 38(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.38.1.3529

Kneller, R., & Pisu, M. (2007). Industrial linkages and export spillovers from FDI. The World Economy, 30(1), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00874.x

Központi Statisztikai Hivatal. (2020). Külföldi irányítású vállalkozások Magyarországon, 2018. https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/pdf/kulfleany18.pdf

Lin, P., Liu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Do Chinese domestic firms benefit from FDI inflow? Evidence of horizontal and vertical spillovers. China Economic Review, 20(4), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2009.05.010

Lipsey, R. E., & Sjöholm, F. (2004). FDI and wage spillovers in Indonesian manufacturing. Review of World Economics, 140(2), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663651

Lux, G. (2017). A külföldi működő tőke által vezérelt iparfejlődési modell és határai Közép-Európában. Tér és Társadalom, 31(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.17649/tet.31.1.2801

Mészáros, Á. (2010). Újabb lépés a toyotizmus felé? Autóipari beszállítói rendszerek és a válság lehetséges hatásai. Külgazdaság, 54(7-8), 57–75.

Meyer, K. E., & Sinani, E. (2005). Spillovers from foreign direct investment: A meta analysis (Working Paper, No. 59). Copenhagen Business School. https://research-api.cbs.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/58936901/6540.pdf

Moran, T. H. (2011). Foreign direct investment and development: Launching a second gen-eration of policy research. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Narula, R., & Driffield, N. (2012). Does FDI cause development? The ambiguity of the evi-dence and why it matters. The European Journal of Development Research, 24, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2011.51

Natsuda, K., Sass, M., & Csonka, L. (2022). Developing a local supply chain network: The case of Magyar Suzuki in Hungary. Acta Oeconomica, 72(4), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2022.00034

Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670–702. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990098

Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in ob-servational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41

Rugraff, E., & Hansen, M. W. (2011). Multinational corporations and local firms in emerg-ing economies – an introduction. In E. Rugraff & M. W. Hansen (Eds.), Multinational corporations and local firms in emerging economies. Amsterdam University Press.

Sass, M. (2011). The impact of foreign direct investment in business services on the local economy: The case of Hungary. In E. Rugraff & M. W. Hansen (Eds.), Multinational cor-porations and local firms in emerging economies. Amsterdam University Press.

Sass, M., & Szanyi, M. (2004). A hazai cégek és a multinacionális vállalatok közötti beszállí-tói kapcsolatok alakulása. Külgazdaság, 48(9), 4–22.

Scott-Kennel, J., & Enderwick, P. (2005). FDI and inter-firm linkages: Exploring the black box of the investment development path. Transnational Corporations, 14(1), 13–23.

Sebestyén, T., Longauer, D., & Iloskics, Z. (2024). A gazdasági dualitás mérési lehetőségei input-output adatok alapján. Szigma, 55(2-3), 237–266. https://doi.org/10.15170/SZIGMA.55.1239

Szalavetz, A. (2019). Globális értékláncok, szakosodás és feljebb lépés. Magyarországi fel-dolgozóipari leányvállalatok tapasztalatai. Napvilág Kiadó.

Trent, R. J., & Monczka, R. M. (2003). International purchasing and global sourcing: What are the differences? Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(3), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2003.tb00162.x

Vasvári, T., & Longauer, D. (2025). Spillovers behind the scenes: How runaway productions affect the domestic film industry. Industry and Innovation, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2025.2500600

Vasvári, T., Danka, S., & Hauck, Zs. (2019). Termelés és innováció – tanulságok a hazai iparpolitika számára. Közgazdasági Szemle, 66(10), 1031–1055. https://doi.org/10.18414/ksz.2019.10.1031

Vince, P. (2010). A vállalati beszerzési és értékesítési kapcsolatok rendszere. Közgazdasági Szemle, 48(11), 980–992.

Published
2026-03-24
How to Cite
VasváriT., & LongauerD. (2026). The interaction between corporate control and absorptive capacity in the supplier integration of domestic firms. Hungarian Economic Review, 73(3), 292-315. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2026.3.292
Section
Tanulmány