Co-agency in healthcare interpreting: The interpreter’s sociocultural and interpersonal role in clinical communication

Dániel Mány

doi:10.48040/PL.2026.1.2

Dániel Mány Semmelweis Egyetem, Szaknyelvi Intézet https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6221-8537

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48040/PL.2026.1.2

Kulcsszavak: healthcare interpreting, interpreter co-agency, sociolinguistic mediation, cultural mediation, interpersonal communication

Absztrakt

This study examines interpreter co-agency in healthcare settings through three French–Hungarian medical interpreting assignments conducted in Hungary between 2023 and 2025. Moving beyond the traditional conduit model, it conceptualizes healthcare interpreters as co-agents whose work is shaped by the clinical situation and co-constructed with patients and healthcare professionals. Adopting a participant-researcher design, the analysis draws on data triangulation across written agreements, pre-assignment correspondence, and post-assignment field notes. The findings show that healthcare interpreters are expected to manage sociolinguistic and pragmatic choices (e.g., forms of address, degree of formality, register shifts, and culturally sensitive terminology), to mediate administrative and systemic differences between healthcare systems, and to contribute to the interpersonal organization of clinical interaction. In high-stakes contexts such as cancer, HIV diagnosis, and emergency care, these expectations extend to negotiating emotional presence, physical proximity, gendered constraints, and interpreting modes. The study concludes that co-agency is an expectation-driven and structurally embedded feature of healthcare interpreting, shaped not only within consultations but also through institutional arrangements and preparatory communication.

Hivatkozások

Angelelli, C. V. (2004): Revisiting the interpreter’s role. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.55
Angelelli, C. V. (2019): Healthcare Interpreting Explained. Routledge: London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315310978
Bigi, S. (2016): Communicating (with) care: A linguistic approach to the study of doctor–patient interactions. IOS Press: Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-655-2-i
Ghosh, A. K. – Joshi, S. – Ghosh, A. (2020): Effective patient–physician communication: A concise review. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India. 68/6. 53–57
Hale, S. B. (2015): Community interpreting. In: Pöchhacker, F. (ed.) (2015): Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies. Routledge: London. 65–69.
Horváth, A. – Gabányi, R. R. (2025): Unveiling public service interpreting in Hungary: insights from NGO perspectives. FITISPos International Journal. 12/1. 149–167. https://doi.org/10.37536/FITISPos-IJ.2025.12.1.408
Horváth, I. (2021): Tolmácsolásetika a 21. században. Fordítástudomány. 23/1. 5–20. https://doi.org/10.35924/fordtud.23.1.1
Leanza, Y. (2005): Roles of community interpreters in pediatrics as seen by interpreters, physicians and researchers. Interpreting. 7. 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.7.2.03lea
Pöchhacker, F. – Shlesinger, M. (eds) (2002): The Interpreting Studies Reader. Routledge: London and New York
Reddy, M. J. (1979): The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In: Ortony, A. (ed.) (1979): Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press: New York. 164–201.
Roy, C. (2000): Interpreting as a discourse process. Oxford University Press: Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501322054
Street, R. L. – Makoul, G. – Arora, N. K. – Epstein, R. M. (2009): How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling. 74/3. 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015
Wadensjö, C. (1998): Interpreting as interaction. Addison Wesley Longman: New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842318
Wadensjö, C. (2009): Community interpreting. In: Baker, M. – Saldanha, G. (eds) (2009): Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. Routledge: London. 40–48.