Civil Society as the Arena of the New European Climate Hegemony

A neo-Gramscian Approach to European Green Transition

  • Mihail Caradaica
Keywords: Change actors, civil society, European integration, green transition, hegemony

Abstract

Using a neo-Gramscian approach, this paper explores the concept of civil society as an arena where European climate hegemony is built. The EU’s green transition, which involves deep social and economic transformations, needs extensive popular support to avoid social instability and the rise of populist parties. To achieve this, the European Commission is trying to construct a counter-hegemonic discourse that challenges the traditional modes of a fossil fuel-based economy by creating an alliance of actors around the ideology of just transition. Therefore, the study addresses the following research question: who are the change agents within European civil society that have aligned with the alliance, and how is fostering a counter-hegemonic discourse against the traditional economic model? By employing a qualitative methodological approach, the study explores the crucial function of civil society in the European green transition, exposing the most important agents and how these agents facilitate the formation of a new climate hegemony.

References

Apeldoorn, Bastiaan van (2004): ‘Theorizing the Transnational: A Historical Materialist Approach’.

Journal of International Relations and Development, 7., (2.), pp. 142–76. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800010.

‘Become a Pact Ambassador’ (n.d.): Accessed 17 March 2024. https://climate-pact.europa.eu/get-involved/become-pact-ambassador_en.

Bieler, Andreas (2005): ‘European Integration and the Transnational Restructuring of Social Relations: The Emergence of Labour as a Regional Actor? *’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 43., (3.), pp. 461–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9886.2005.00565.x

Bieler, Andreas–Adam David Morton (2001): ‘The Gordian Knot of Agency – Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective’. European Journal of International Relations, 7., (1.), pp. 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007001001

‘Business Leaders J oin Forces with the Commission f or an Inclusive Green Deal’ (2022): CSR Europe. Accessed 19 March 2024. https://www.csreurope.org/newsbundle-articles/businessleaders-join-forces-with-the-commission-for-and-inclusive-green-deal

Cader, Indira Thalia–Dwi, Ardhanariswari Sundrijo (2023): ‘Critical Analysis of Neo-Gramscian Hegemony’. Eduvest – Journal of Universal Studies, 3., (8.), pp. 1435–48. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v3i8.894

‘Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism – European Commission’ (n.d.): Accessed 20 May 2024. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en.

‘Corporate Sustainability Reporting – European Commission’. (n.d.): Accessed 19 May 2024.

https://finance.ec.europa.eu/capital-markets-union-and-financial-markets/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/corporate-sustainability-reporting_en

Demetriades, Stavroula–Dragoș Adăscăliței (2023): Supporting Regions in the Just Transition: Role of Social Partners. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2806/830912

Dirk, Jarre (2012): ‘Civil Society in the European Union’. Civil Szemle, 9., (1.), WOS:000303076900007.

Accessed 18 May 2024. http://www.civilszemle.hu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/30_Civil_Szemle_2012_1_web.pdf

‘European Alliance for a Just Transition -’ (n.d.): European Alliance for a Just Transition. Accessed

March 2024. https://alliancejusttransition.eu/

Evans, Bryan (2005): ‘How the State Changes Its Mind: A Gramscian Account of Ontario’s Managerial

Culture Change’. Philosophy of Management, 5., (2.), pp. 25–46. https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20055220

‘Events’. (n.d.): Accessed 19 May 2024. https://climate-pact.europa.eu/news-and-events/events_en

Galgoczi, Bela (2024): ‘Trade Unions, Collective Bargaining and the Green Transition in the next EU Legislative Period’. Heinrich Boll Stiftung. https://eu.boell.org/en/2024/04/16/trade-unions-collective-bargaining-green-transition

Gramsci, Antonio (1971): ‘“The Intellectuals”, in Selections from the Prison Notebooks’. https://www.marxists.org/archive/gramsci/prison_notebooks/problems/intellectuals.htm

Griffiths, Michael (2023): ‘From Fossil Capitalism to Climate Capitalism: Contemporary Systems for Capitalist Accumulation and Incremental Climate Action’. Political Science Undergraduate

Review, 8., (1.), https://doi.org/10.29173/psur345

Huber, Matthew T. (2009): ‘Energizing Historical Materialism: Fossil Fuels, Space and the Capitalist Mode of Production’. Geoforum, Themed Issue: Postcoloniality, Responsibility and Care, 40.,

(1.), pp. 105–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.08.004

Icaza Garza, Rosalba (2006): ‘To Be and Not to Be: The Question of Transborder Civic Activism and Regionalization in Mexico. A Critical Account of Neo-Gramscian Perspectives’. Globalizations, 3., (4.), pp. 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730601022461

Johnson, Richard (2007): ‘Post-Hegemony?: I Don’t Think So. Theory, Culture–Society, 24., (3.):,pp. 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075958

Köpping Athanasopoulos, Harald (2020): ‘Thinking Eur ope Differently – Cr itical Approaches to European Integration’. In: EU Migration Management and the Social Purpose of European Integration: The Spillover of Misery, edited by Harald Köpping Athanasopoulos, pp. 43–64.

IMISCOE Research Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42040-6_3

Levy, David L.–Daniel Egan (2003): ‘A Neo-Gramscian Approach to Corporate Political Strategy: Conflict and Accommodation in the Climate Change Negotiations*’. Journal of Management Studies, 40., (4.), pp. 803–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00361

‘Meet Our Ambassadors’ (n.d.): Accessed 17 February 2024. https://climate-pact.europa.eu/getinvolved/meet-our-ambassadors_en

Pianta, Mario–Matteo, Lucchese (2020): ‘Rethinking the European Green Deal: An Industrial Policy for a Just Transition in Europe’. Review of Radical Political Economics, 52., (4.), pp. 633–641.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613420938207

Pijl, Kees van der (2005): ‘Gramsci and Left Managerialism’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy., 8., (4.), pp. 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230500205169

Rupert, Mark (1998): ‘(Re-)Engaging Gramsci: A Response to Germain and Kenny’. Review of International Studies, 24., (3.), pp. 427–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210598004276

Sasvari, Nora (2015): ‘How Does the European Citizens’ Initiative Help Partcipation in EU Affairs?’

Civil Szemle., 12., (1.), WOS:000355383400004. Accessed 17 May 2024 https://www.civilszemle.hu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/42_Civil_Szemle_2015_1_web.pdf

Schoenefeld, Jonas J (2021): ‘Interest Groups, NGOs or Civil Society Organisations? The Framing of Non-State Actors in the EU’. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32., (3.), pp. 585–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00283-w.

Silva, Deise Rosalio (2022): ‘Gramsci and Intellectuals, from Organic to Lorian: A Facet to Think about Bolsonarism’. Educação Em Revista 38 (December):e39479. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698368539479T

Spani, Riccardo Christopher (2020): ‘Launching the EU’s J ust Transition Mechanism’. FEEM Policy Brief . https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3711325

Stegemann, Laura–Marinus Ossewaarde (2018): ‘A Sustainable Myth: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective on the Populist and Post-Truth Tendencies of the European Green Growth Discourse’.

Energy Research–Social Science, Sustainable energy transformations in an age of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance, 43., (9.), pp. 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.015

Thalberg, Karin–Camille Defard–Thierry Chopin–Alicia Barbas–Klervi Kerneis (2024): ‘The European Green Deal in the Face of Rising Radical Right-Wing Populism’. Policy Paper, no. 296. https://institutdelors.eu/en/publications/the-european-green-deal-in-the-face-of-risingradical-right-wing-populism/

Tosun, Jale (2022): ‘What Role for Climate Pact Ambassadors? A Policy Process Perspective’. European View, 21., (2.), pp. 171–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/17816858221128719

Tosun, Jale–Lucas Geese–Irene Lorenzoni (2023): ‘For Young and Future Generations? Insights from the Web Profiles of European Climate Pact Ambassadors’. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 14., (4.), pp . 747–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.53

Tosun, Jale–Jan Pollex–Laurence Crumbie (2023): ‘European Climate Pact Citizen Volunteers: Strategies for Deepening Engagement and Impact’. Policy Design and Practice, 6., (3.), pp. 344–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2023.2199961

Warleigh, Alex (2001): ‘“Europeanizing” Civil Society: NGOs as Agents of Political Socialization’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 39., (4.), pp. 619–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00324

Winkler, Harald (2020): ‘Towards a Theory of Just Transition: A Neo-Gramscian Understanding of How to Shift Development Pathways to Zero Poverty and Zero Carbon.’ Energy Research and Social Science, 70., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101789

Zimmermann, Katharina–Vincent Gengnagel (2023): ‘Mapping the Social Dimension of the European Green Deal’. European Journal of Social Security, 25., (4.), pp. 523–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627231208698

Published
2024-06-24
How to Cite
CaradaicaM. (2024). Civil Society as the Arena of the New European Climate Hegemony: A neo-Gramscian Approach to European Green Transition. Civil Rewiev, 21(2), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.62560/csz.2024.02.01
Section
Cikkek