“The greater the disadvantage, the better quality is needed of everything” – a case study on the activities of the TaLéTa Intercultural Center and Incubator House

  • Julianna Kiss Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Decision Sciences, Institute of Operations and Decision Sciences,
Keywords: social and solidarity economy, social impact, social innovation, TaLéTa Intercultural Center and Incubator House, Ukrainian Roma refugees, asylum system

Abstract

The attack launched by Russia on Ukraine on February 24, 2022, forced millions of people, primarily women and children, to flee their homes. In addition to the institutions of the state asylum system that had been dismantled in previous years, numerous local governments, charitable and civil society organizations, and informal initiatives also participated in supporting refugees arriving in Hungary. Among the support activities, the issue of education quickly became a priority, connected to which many difficulties arose in the case of disadvantaged Transcarpathian Roma refugee families living in deep poverty as well. For them, certain civil initiatives played a primary role in providing assistance in the field of education, an area of research that has received little analysis so far. This paper explores this topic through a case study: it presents the TaLéTa Intercultural Center and Incubator House’s program based on interviews with its leaders, mentors, a representative of a partner organization, and refugee and non-refugee beneficiaries, in the context of social impact and social innovation. The main research question is how the TaLéTa Intercultural Center and Incubator House implements its activities supporting Roma refugees in Transcarpathia, and to what extent these activities result in social impact and social innovation. Based on the results, the initiative provides a gap-filling and innovative response to the problems of disadvantaged children and families by applying a complex approach that strengthens empowerment and inclusion, complementing pedagogical support with mental and social assistance. Through its flexibility, continuity, professionalism and partnership implementation, the program – which operates entirely on a voluntary basis –achieves a positive social impact and innovation for both the target group and the host society, the effectiveness of which can be further strengthened by reducing the difficulties arising from the shortcomings of the institutional environment and by developing certain areas related to operation.

References

Auerswald, P. (2009). Creating social value. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1376425

Bakó, Cs. (2022). A társadalmi hatásmérésről – A civil-nonprofit szervezetek körében végzett hatásmérési projektek alapján. Önkéntes Szemle, 2(3), 30–57.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298.

Defourny, J. (2014). From third sector to social enterprise. In J. Defourny, L. Hulgård, & V. Pestoff (Eds.), Social enterprise, third sector: Changing European landscapes in a comparative perspective (pp. 17–41). London: Routledge.

Gerő, M., Pokornyi, Zs., Sik, E., & Surányi, R. (2024). A migrációs narratívák keletkezése és mozgása – Magyarország. BRIDGES Working Papers, 31. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10479449

Guzmán, C., Santos, F. J., Valiente, L., & Santolaya, F. J. (2023). Social innovation for the socio-labour integration of refugees in new host countries: The Spanish case. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2023.2275132

Kiss, A., Hegedüs, J., & Somogyi, E. (2023). Housing of Ukrainian refugees in Europe: Options for long-term solutions. Country case study Hungary. https://www.habitat.org/sites/default/files/documents/HU-case%20study.pdf

Kiss, J. (megjelenés alatt). Otthont adni az otthontalanságban – a Dorkász Szolgálat kárpátaljai roma menekülteket támogató programjának társadalmi innovációs vonatkozásai.

Moron, D., Małgorzata, M., & Csoba, J. (2025). Humanitarian aid and empowerment of Ukrainian refugees: The case of Visegrad Group countries: Czechia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. London: Routledge.

Moulaert, F., Mehmood, A., MacCallum, D., & Leubolt, B. (2017). Social innovation as a trigger for transformations. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Nagy, Á., & Krátki, N. (2024). Open value creation for the common good. Social Enterprise Journal, 20(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-08-2023-0103

OECD. (2002.) Glossary of key terms in evaluation and results based management. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/06/glossary-of-key-terms-in-evaluation-and-results-based-management-for-sustainable-development-second-edition_2767e14e/632da462-en-fr-es.pdf

Periféria. (2023). Ukrajnából érkező menekülteknek szóló közép- és hosszú távú lakhatási program lehetőségei és korlátai – Az Utcáról Lakásba! Egyesület és a Habitat for Humanity Magyarország lakhatási programjának értékelése. https://www.habitat.hu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/magyar_riport_ULE_Habitat.pdf

Phills, J., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.

Schröder, A., & Kuschmierz, L. (2017). Social innovation in education and lifelong learning: Case study results (Deliverable D4.3). SI-DRIVE Project. Technische Universität Dortmund. https://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/SI-DRIVE-Deliverable-D4_3-Education-final.pdf

Szathmári, A. (2024). Navigating the playing field: Reimagining the sports industry in the face of accelerated climate change. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 60(3), 418–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902241268256

Tóth, B. (2023). Az ukrajnai menekültek helyzete Magyarországon. Migrációkutató Intézet Gyorselemzések. https://migraciokutato.hu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/20230104_MKI_GYORSELEMZES_2023_01_toth_bettina_az_-ukrajnai_menekultek_helyzete_magyarorszagon.pdf

Tóth, J., & Bernát, A. (2023). Menekültválság 2022-ben: Az Ukrajna elleni orosz agresszió menekültjeinek magyarországi fogad(tat)ása. In T. Kolosi, I. Szelényi, & I. Gy. Tóth (Eds.), Társadalmi Riport 2022 (pp. 347–370).

UNHCR. (2023.) What is innovation? Innovation Service. https://www.unhcr.org/innovation/innovation-boilerplate/

UNHCR. (2025.) Ukraine refugee situation. https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine, (letöltve: 2025.06.01.)

Published
2026-01-06
How to Cite
KissJ. (2026). “The greater the disadvantage, the better quality is needed of everything” – a case study on the activities of the TaLéTa Intercultural Center and Incubator House. Civil Rewiev, 23(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.62560/csz.2026.01.2
Section
Cikkek