The Institutional Role of Migrant NGO’s in Central and Eastern Europe:
A Comparative Analysis Based on EU and International Organization Reports
Abstract
This article examines the institutional role of migrant non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the development and implementation of minority rights across Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Drawing on policy documents, monitoring reports, and institutional publications produced by the European Union and major international organizations, the study analyses how migrant NGOs function as intermediary actors situated between state institutions and minority communities. Rather than relying on primary fieldwork, the research adopts a document-based comparative approach to assess the extent to which migrant NGOs contribute to the institutionalization of minority rights through advocacy, service provision, and participation in consultative mechanisms. The findings indicate that migrant NGOs in the CEE region occupy a multifaceted institutional position that extends well beyond formal representation, encompassing policy influence, implementation of integration programmes, and the advancement of cultural and linguistic rights. Their institutional capacity and operational autonomy, however, vary considerably across national contexts, shaped by divergent legal frameworks, configurations of state–civil society relations, and trajectories of democratic governance. The article contends that migrant NGOs constitute critical components of the evolving civil sphere in post-socialist societies, mediating between international minority rights norms and domestic institutional practices. Through a synthesis of EU integration reports, Council of Europe monitoring mechanisms, and NGO assessments, the study contributes to scholarly debates on civil society and minority rights by identifying the structural conditions under which migrant organizations emerge as effective institutional actors. The article concludes with policy recommendations aimed at strengthening civil society’s role in minority rights governance across the region.
References
Ambrosini, M., & Van der Leun, J. (2015). Introduction to the special issue: Implementing human rights: Civil society and migration policies. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 13(2), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2015.1017632
Ambrosini, M. (2021). The battleground of asylum and immigration policies: a conceptual inquiry. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 44(3), 374-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1836380
Anheier, H. K. (2017). Civil society challenged: Towards an enabling policy environment. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 11(2017-29): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2017-29
Auer, D., & Schaub, M. (2024). Mass emigration and the erosion of liberal democracy. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), sqae026. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae026
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harward University Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Börzel, T. A., & Buzogány, A. (2010). Governing EU accession in transition countries: The role of non-state actors. Acta Politica, 45(1–2), 158–182. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2009.26
Brunarska, Z., Kindler, M., Szulecka, M., Toruńczyk-Ruiz, S. (2016). Ukrainian Migration to Poland: A “Local” Mobility?. In: Fedyuk, O., Kindler, M. (eds) Ukrainian Migration to the European Union. IMISCOE Research Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41776-9_7
Checkel, J. T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59(4), 801–826. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050289
Civil Liberties Union for Europe. (2025). Rule of law report 2024. https://www.liberties.eu/en/publications/rule-of-law-report-2024
CIVICUS. (2024). CIVICUS Monitor 2024: Global findings. https://monitor.civicus.org/globalfindings_2024/
Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
Ekiert, G., & Kubik, J. (2010). Rebellious civil society: Popular protest and democratic consolidation in Poland, 1989–1993. University of Michigan Press
Ekiert, G., & Dasanaike, N. (2024). The return of dictatorship. Journal of Democracy, 35(4), 177-191. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2024.a937742
European Commission. (2024). 2024 Rule of law report: Country chapter on the rule of law situation in Hungary. Publications Office of the European Union. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/upholding-rule-law/rule-law/rule-law-mechanism/2024-rule-law-report_en
Eurostat. (2024). Temporary protection for persons fleeing Ukraine — annual statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Temporary_protection_for_persons_fleeing_Ukraine
Faist, T. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: Implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23(2), 189–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/014198700329024
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.Foucault
Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Human Rights Watch. (2025). World report 2025: Hungary. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2025/country-chapters/hungary
Jacobsson, K., & Saxonberg, S. (2016). Beyond NGO-ization: The development of social movements in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge.
Kelley, J. G. (2004). International actors on the domestic scene: Membership conditionality and socialization by international institutions. International Organization, 58(3), 425–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304583017
Koopmans, R. (2013). Multiculturalism and immigration: A contested field in cross-national comparison. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 147-169. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145630
Kozachuk, O. (2018). Rethinking Central and Eastern Europe’S Identity: Cultural Pluralism And Multiculturalism Versus The Rise Of Nationalism. EURINT, 5(1), 27-43. https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/eurint/y2018v5p27-43.html
Lang, S. (2012). NGOs, civil society, and the public sphere. Cambridge University Press.
Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2004). Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 15–30). Oxford University Press.
Nagy, Á., Béres-Áfra, Z., & Szalóki, V. (2025). The Domestication of the Civil Sphere. Civil Szemle, 22(2), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.62560/csz.2025.02.1
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Petrova, T., & Tarrow, S. (2007). Transactional and participatory activism in the emerging European polity: The puzzle of East-Central Europe. Comparative political studies, 40(1), 74-94.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006291
Polgár, I. J. (2023). The role of Civil Society organisations in migration management. Cooperation between public authorities and civil society actors at the EU’s South Eastern Borders. Civil Szemle, 20(4), 27-40.
Polgár, I. J., Penzes, J., & Radics, Z. (2025). Assessing the role of Moldovan Civil Society Organizations and International Funds in migration management. Civil Szemle, 22(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.62560/csz.2025.01.4
Politico. (2024, November 28). 7 reasons why Romanian voters are hacked off—by the numbers. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/romania-presidential-election-voters-demographics-cost-of-living-crisis-poverty/
Pries, L., & Zülfikar Savci, B. S. (2023). Between Humanitarian Assistance and Externalizing of EU Borders: The EU-Turkey Deal and Refugee Related Organizations in Turkey. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 11(1), 57-74. DOI: 10.1177/23315024231156381
Putnam, R. D., Nanetti, R. Y., & Leonardi, R. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
Schrover, M., & Vermeulen, F. (2005). Immigrant organisations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(5), 823–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830500177792
Spirova, M. (2025). Bulgaria: Political Developments and Data in 2024: Elections, EPlections, Elections!. Political Data Yearbook, 64(1), 64-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-8852.70025
UNHCR. (2024). Operational data portal: Ukraine refugee situation. https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine
University of Vienna. (2024). Romania’s fragile successes and the rise of the far right. EastBlog. https://eastblog.univie.ac.at/2024/12/19/
Vermeersch, P. (2006). The Romani movement: Minority politics and ethnic mobilization in contemporary Central Europe (Vol. 4). Berghahn books.
Wolch, J. R. (1990). The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. Foundation Center.
