How Civil Societies Are Undermined

An Analysis of Factors That Endanger Civic Freedoms

  • Eugen Gabor National University of Political Studies and Public Administration (SNSPA), Bucharest
Keywords: Democratic blacksliding, civil society, elections, foreign policy, illiberalism

Abstract

Several studies highlight the fact that the first decades of the 21st century are characterized by a resurgence of authoritarianism, which contradicts the optimistic visions of  the 1990s regarding the so-called end of history. For instance, Freedom House argues, presenting relevant data, that since 2006, a process of democratic backsliding has been in place worldwide. Not only developing countries or regions are affected but also countries in Europe and Northern America, where democracy once seemed inexpugnable. This illiberal wave thrives on the weaknesses of civil societies and has the effect of further reducing the dimensions of the civic space. Although those who promote open societies are on the defensive, their cause is far from being an obsolete remnant of the second half of the 20th century. However, their endeavors can be ineffective if the causes of the antidemocratic forces’ success are not properly acknowledged. The main goal of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of the factors that are vital for building or strengthening closed societies. To shape relevant conclusions, we analyze information from projects like People Power under Attack, realized by the CIVICUS global civil society network or V-Dem (The Varieties of Democracy), managed by an institute affiliated with the University of Gothenburg (Sweden). We focus especially on countries that experienced sharp transformations regarding the state of their civil societies in the last 3–5 years. Our findings underline, among others, the importance of the electoral process and foreign policy influencing the evolution of the civic space. Cases like the Czech Republic suggest that the decline of civil society can be stopped at the polls. The Russian Federation is an example of a successful suspension of civic freedoms under the pretext of protecting the population from toxic foreign interference.

 

References

Aichholzer, Julian–Kritzinger, Sylvia–Wagner, Markus–Zeglovits, Eva (2014): How has Radical Right Support Transformed Established Political Conflicts? The Case of Austria. West European Politics, 2014. Jan; 37., (1.), pp. 113–137. https://doi.or/10.1080/01402382.2013.814956 Epub 2013 Aug 5.

PMID: 26770003; PMCID: PMC469 5981.

Akkerman, Tjitske (2003): Populism and Democracy: Challenge or Pathology? Acta Politica, 38., pp. 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500021

Baker, Gideon (2002): Civil Society and D emocratic Theory: Alter native Voices. London–New York: Routledge,

Bandau, Frank (2022): What Explains the Electoral Crisis of Social Democracy? A Systematic Review of the Literature. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, pp. 183–205. https://doi.or/10.1017/gov.2022.10

Berman, Sheri (1997): Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics, 49., (3.), pp. 401–29. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054008

Brechenmacher, Saskia–Carothers, Thomas (201 9): Defending Civic S pace: Is the International Community Stuck? – Working Paper. Washington, DC.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Cann Heather, W.–Raymond, Leigh (2018): Does climate denialism still matter? The prevalence of alternative frames in opposition to climate policy. Environmental Politics, https://doi.or/10.1080/09644016.2018.1439353

Chelcea, Septimiu (2007): Metodologia cercetării sociologice: metode cantitative şi calitative. Bucureşti: Editura Economică.

Cheung, David T. L. (2021): Totalitarianism, State and Civil Society: The Case of Hong Kong. In: Cohen, Richard A.–Marci, Tito–Scuccimarra, Luca (Eds.): The Politics of Humanity. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75957-5_9

Collier, David–Elman, Colin (2008): Qualitative and Multi-Method Research: Organizations, Publication, and Reflections on Integration. In: Box-Steffensmeier Janet M–Brady Henry E.–Collier David (Eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Constant, Benjamin (1997): Despre libertate la antici și la moderni. Iași: Editura Institutul European.

Dobrescu, Pau–Durach, Flavia (2023): Clashing Visions for Development. The Age of Strategic Uncertainty,

pp. 35–47. In: Țãranu, Andrei–Németh, Istvan Peter–Gabor, Eugen–Falus, Orsolya–Zakota, Zoltan (Eds.): Changing the Path. Crisis, Society, and Politics in the Contemporary World. Budapest–Dunaújváros: Civil Szemle Alapítvány–DUE Press.

Fromm, Eric (1941): Escape from Freedom. New York: Farrar–Rinehart.

Fukuyama, Francisc (1992): The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.

Gunitsky, Seva (2017): Aftershocks: Great Powers and Domestic Reforms in the Twentieth Century. Princeton–Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Gunter, Michael M. (2024): Erdogan's Path to Authoritarianism. The Continuing Journey. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Halmai, Gabor (2019): Populism, authoritarianism, and constitutionalism. German Law Journal, 20., pp. 296–313. https://doi.or/10.1017/glj.2019.23

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm F riedrich (2008): Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hobsbawm, Eric (2015): Era Extremelor. O istorie a secolului XX. Chișinău: Cartier.

Ionescu, Ghiță–Gellner, Ernest (1969): Populism: its Meanings and National Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

Keane, John (2009): Civil Society, Definitions and Approaches. In: Anheier, Helmut K.–Toepler,

Stefan (Eds.): International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_531

Kellner, Douglas (2018): Donald Trump as Authoritarian Populist: A Frommian Analysis. In: Morelock, Jeremiah (Ed.): Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism. pp. 71–82. London: University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book30.e. License: CC-B Y-NC-ND

Krange, Olve–Kaltenborn, Bjorn P.–Hultman, Martin (2021): “Don’t confuse me with facts” – how right-wing populism affects trust in agencies advocating anthropogenic climate change as a reality. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8., p. 255. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00930-7.

Lawrence, Michael–Homer-Dixon, Thomas–Janzwood, Scott–Rockstöm, Johan–Renn, Ortwin–Donges, Jonathan F. (2024): Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement. Global Sustainability, 7., (6.). https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2024.1

Levitsky, Steven–Ziblatt, Daniel (2018): How democracies die. New York: Crown Publishing.

March, Luke (2023): Putin: populist, anti-populist, or pseudo-populist?. Journal of Political Ideologies,

pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2023.2250744

Miliband, David (2020): Brexit, Populism, and the Future of British Democracy. Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, 15., pp. 150–165. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48573644.

Mitulescu, Sorin (2011): Metode de cercetare în știintele sociale. Bucureşti: Editura Pro Universitaria.

Muller, Jan-Werner (2016): What Is Populism?. Philadelphia: Univ ersity of Pennsylvania Press.

Natea Mihaela, Daciana (2023): Fabricating Truth: From a Hybrid War to Political Fake News. Study Case on Romanian Illiberal Parties’ Discourse in the Context of the Ukrainian War, pp. 155–168. In: Carp, Radu–Németh, Istvan Peter–Matiuță, Cristina–Falus, Orsolya–Zakota, Zoltan (Eds.): Political Parties and Civil Society: A Central and Eastern European Perspective. Budapest–Dunaújváros: Civil Szemle Alapítvány–DUE Press.

Niemi, William L. (2011): Karl Marx's sociological theory of democracy: Civil society and political rights. The Social Science Journal, 48., (1.), pp. 39–51. ISSN 0362-3319, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2010.07.002

Quigley, Kevin F. F. (2000): Lofty Goals, Modest Results: Assisting Civil Society in Eastern Europe. In: Ottaway, Marina–Carothers, Thomas (Eds.): Funding Virtue: Civil Society Aid and Democracy Promotion. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Rusu, Sabina (2023): Geopolitics and War within a 280 Characters Limit: A Positive and Normative Analysis of Elon Musk’s “peace plan” for Ukraine. Perspective Politice, Special Issue. pp. 157–167. https://doi.org/10.25019/perspol/23.16.0

Shirk, Susan (2018): China in Xi’s ‘New Era’: The Return to Personalistic Rule. Journal of Democracy, 29., (2.), pp. 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0022.

Soares, Felipe Bonow–Gruzd, Anatoliy–Mai, Philip (2023): Falling for Russian Propaganda: Understanding the Factors that Contribute to Belief in Pro-Kremlin Disinformation on Social Media.

Social Media + Society, 9., (4.). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231220330

Tapesh, Storai (2023): The Collapse of the Civic Space in Afghanistan and Supporting the Fight to Reclaim it – Policy Brief. Princeton: Afghanistan Policy Lab, School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University. 37.

Tibi, Bassan (2007): The Totalitarianism of Jihadist Islamism and its Challenge to Europe and to Islam. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 8., (1.), pp. 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760601121630

de Tocqueville, Alexis (1969): Democracy in Amer ica. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books.

Van Rooy, Alison (2004): The global legitimacy game: civil society, globalization, and protest. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Web links

Abouaoun, Elie–Hill, Thomas M.–Siebert, Leo (2022): Tunisia’s new constitution expands presidential power. What’s next for its democracy?. United States Institute of Peace, July 28,

: https://www.usip.org/publications/2022/07/tunisias-new-constitution-expands-presidential-power-hats-next-its-democracy.

Amnesty International (2023): The Public Order Bill: Explained. Campaigns Blog, 26 April 2023:

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/blogs/campaigns-blog/public-order-bill-explained.

Amnesty International (2024): Russia: Authorities brutally suppress mourners of Aleksei Navalny. Amnesty International English, 19 February 2024: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/02/russia-authorities-brutally-suppress-mourners-of-aleksei-navalny/.

British Council (1999): Civil Society: A British Council Definition. British Council: www.britcoun.org/governance/civil/review.

CIVICUS (n.d.): About Us. CIVICUS M onitor: https://monitor.civicus.org/about/.

CIVICUS Monitor (2022): People Power under Attack. CIVICUS Monitor: https://civicus.contentfiles.net/media/assets/file/2022GlobalFindingsEmbargoed16March.pdf.

CIVICUS Monitor (2023): People Power under Attack. CIVICUS Monitor: https://monitor.civicus.org/globalfindings_2023/.

Colton, Timothy (2022): What Does Putin’s Conservatism Seek to Conserve?. Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, January 17, 2022: https://daviscenter.fas.harvard.edu/insights/what-does-putins-conservatism-seek-conserve.

Euronews (2024): Stoltenberg says presidential elections in Russia 'neither free nor fair'. Euro news, 18 March 2024: https://www.euronews.com/2024/03/18/natos-stoltenberg-says-presidential-elections-in-russia-were-neither-free-nor-fair.

European Commission (2023): Commission Staff Working Document. 2023 Rule of Law Report

– Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Czechia. European Commission, Brussels, 5 July 2023: https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2023-07/12_1_52570_coun_chap_czechia_en.pdf.

Freedom House (2024): Freedom in the World in 2024. Freedom House: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/FIW_2024_DigitalBooklet.pdf.

Government of the Czech Republic (2022): Policy Statement of the Government. Government of the Czech Republic, 7 January 2022: https://vlada.gov.cz/en/jednani-vlady/policy-statement/policy-statement-of-the-government-193762/.

Heijmans, Philip J. (2019): Czech 'Donald Trump' meets real Donald Trump. TRT: https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/czech-donald-trump-meets-real-donald-trump-12722474.

Human Rights Watch (2022): Russia: New Restrictions for ‘Foreign Agents’. Human Rights Watch, December 1, 2022: https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/12/01/russia-new-restrictions-foreign-agents.

Human Rights Watch (2024): Tunisia: Deepening Civil Society Crackdown. Human Rights Watch, May 17, 2024: https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/05/17/tunisia-deepening-civil-society-crackdown.

Manchester City Council (2024): Notice of Motion - Protecting Our Democracy by upholding the right to protest. Manchester City Council 20th of March 2024: https://democracy.manchester.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=14006

Nolting, Ingmar Bjorn (2023): The eviction of Lützerath: the village being destroyed for a coalmine – a photo essay. The Guardian, 24 January 2023: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/jan/24/eviction-lutzerath-village-destroyed-coalmine-a-photo-essay.

Our World in Data a (n.d.): Civil society participation index, 1789 to 2022. Our World in Data:

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/civil-society-participation-index.

Our World in Data b (n.d.): Civil liberties index. Our World in Data: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/civil-liberties-index-eiu.

Singelnstein, Tobias–Obens, Henning (2023): A Climate of Repression. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, 6 June 2023: https://www.rosalux.de/en/news/id/50463/a-climate-of-repression.

Trading Economics (n.d): Germany Full Year GDP Growth. Trading Economics: https://tradingeconomics.com/germany/full-year-gdp-growth.

V-Dem (2015): The role of Civil Society Organizations. V-Dem Staff: https://v-dem.net/weekly_graph/the-role-of-civil-society-organizations .

Van Brugen, Isabel (2023): Putin's Approval Ratings as 2024 Election Year Begins. Newsweek,

December 28, 2023: https://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-approval-ratings-2024-presidential-election-1856173 .

Yerkes, Sarah (2019): Tunisia’s Elections, Explained. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: https://carnegieendowment.org/publications/interactive/tunisian-elections-2019#.

Published
2024-06-24
How to Cite
GaborE. (2024). How Civil Societies Are Undermined: An Analysis of Factors That Endanger Civic Freedoms. Civil Rewiev, 21(2), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.62560/csz.2024.02.04
Section
Cikkek