A genre-specific approach to the terminology of the investor pitch

  • Károly Polcz Budapesti Gazdasági Egyetem Külkereskedelmi Kar Nemzetközi Üzleti Szaknyelvek Tanszék
  • Marianna Válóczi Budapesti Gazdasági Egyetem Külkereskedelmi Kar Nemzetközi Üzleti Szaknyelvek Tanszék
Keywords: specialized language teaching, genre, terminology, pitch, term transparency

Abstract

The paper proposes a set of criteria for describing terminology specific to a particular text genre in a way that is relevant for the purposes of language teaching. The design of the criteria is based on the genre of the investor pitch, but it can also be applied to other genres. The corpus of the study consists of 45 investor pitches from which  352 individual terms were extracted. This amounts to a total of 1,173 occurrences under investigation including repeated terms. This was followed by the identification of the criteria for classifying the terms into relatively homogeneous groups from the perspective of specialized language teaching.

The analysis shows that the terminology of the investor pitch can be described in terms of the following four aspects: sources of terms, types of terms, frequency of occurrence and transparency of terms. The relatively large dataset also provides an opportunity to determine the proportion of terms represented in the groups according to the aforementioned criteria. This provides essential information on the background knowledge and the related terms that students need to acquire for genre proficiency. The results of the research can be used as a guideline for the development of materials to teach genre-specific terminology virtually in any field of specialized language.

References

Clark, C. (2008): The impact of entrepreneurs’ oral ’pitch’ presentation skills on business angels’ initial screening investment decisions. Venture Capital. 10/3. 257–279.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13691060802151945

Daly, P. – Davy, D. (2016): Crafting the Investor Pitch Using Insights from Rhetoric and Linguistics. In: Alessi,

G. M. – Jacobs, G. (eds) (2016): The ins and outs of business and professional discourse research. Palgrave MacMillan: New York. 182–203.

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507686_10

Farrall, C – Lindsley, M. (2008): Professional English in Use. Marketing. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Fried, V. H. – Hisrich, R. D. (1994): Toward a model of venture capitalist decision-making. Financial Management. 23/3. 28–37.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3665619

Gläser, R. (1995): Relations between phraseology and terminology in English for special purposes. In: Glaser, R. (1995): Linguistic features and genre profiles of scientific English. Peter Lang: Frankfurt. 33-57.

Gläser, R. (2007): Phraseological units in the language for special purposes. In: Fiedler, S. (2007): English phraseology. A Coursebook. GNV: Tübingen. 138–142.

Glendinning, E. – Howard, R. (2007): Professional English in Use. Medicine. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Haines, G. H. – Madill, J. J. – Riding, A. R. (2003): Informal investment in Canada: Financing small business growth. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. 16/3-4. 13–40.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2003.10593306

ISO 704: 2009(E). Terminology work – Principles and methods. ISO.

Károly, K. (2007): Szövegtan és fordítás. Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest.

Kanze, D. – Huang, L. – Conley, M. A. – Higgins, E. T. (2018): We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding. Academy of Management Journal. 61/2. 586–614.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1215

Lee, R. (2009): English for Environmental Science in Higher Education Studies. Garnet Publishing: Reading.

Mason, C. M. – Rogers, A. (1997): The business angels’ investment decisions: An exploratory analysis. In: Deakins, D. – Jennings, P. – Mason, C. (eds) (1997): Small firms: Entrepreneurship in the 1990s. Sage Publications: London. 29–46.

MacKenzie, I. (2010): English for business studies. A course for business studies and economics students. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

MacMillan, I. C. – Siegel, R. – Subba, P. N. (1985): Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing. 1/1. 119–128.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(85)90011-4

Mckeown, A – Wright, R. (2011): Professional English in Use. Management. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Polcz, K. (2018): A befektetői pitch az üzleti nyelvórán. In: Bocz Zs. – Besznyák, R. (szerk.) (2018): Tudásmegosztás, értékközvetítés, digitalizáció - trendek a szaknyelvoktatásban és -kutatásban: cikkek, tanulmányok a hazai szaknyelvoktatásról és -kutatásról. SZOKOE: Budapest. 275–284.

https://doi.org/10.48040/PL.2022.2.2

Polcz, K. (2022): Kockázati tőkések és üzleti angyalok kérdéseinek tartalomelemzése. Porta Lingua. 2. sz. 17–24.

Sanberg, W. R. – Schweiger, D. M. – Hofer, C. F. (1988): The use of verbal protocols in determining venture capitalists’ decision processes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 13/1. 8–20.

https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878801300204

Wallen, J. – Phillips, T. (2008): English for Law in Higher Education Studies. Garnet Publishing: Reading

Published
2023-12-01
Section
Szaknyelv és terminológia