Students’ perception of CLIL in higher education – Preliminary results of the CLIL HET project

  • Mária Bakti University of Szeged Faculty of Education Institute of Applied Humanities
  • Tamás Erdei University of Szeged Faculty of Education Institute of Applied Humanities
  • Valéria Juhász University of Szeged Faculty of Education Institute of Applied Humanities
Keywords: CLIL, CLIL in higher education, CLIL HET project, EMI, students’ expectations

Abstract

There has been a growing research interest into the implementation of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in higher education, however, limited research attention has been devoted to the investigation of the situation in the Visegrad countries. These countries have seen an increasing pressure on higher education institutions to provide courses taught through English in order to enhance teacher and student mobility, to share knowledge and to network. Still, disciplinary teachers are not always prepared for this task. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it introduces the Visegrad 4+ Project CLIL-HET (Content and Language Integrated Learning – Higher Education Teacher). In the course of the project, a special platform for CLIL, ESP, and disciplinary teachers has been created. Disciplinary teachers can complete a course on CLIL methodology at the website, and the project also aims to assess the linguistic weaknesses of disciplinary teachers who teach their subject through English. The second aim is to report on international students’ expectations on courses taught through English at the Hungarian partner institution of the project, the Faculty of Education of the University of Szeged.

References

Ball, P. (2009): Does CLIL work? In: D. Hill and P. Alan (eds.) (2009): The Best of Both Worlds? International Perspectives on CLIL. Norwich Institute for Language Education: Norwich. 32-43

Bentley, K. (2010): The TKT Course: CLIL Module. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Doiz, A. – Lasagabaster, D. – Pavón, V. (2019): The integration of language and content in English-medium instruction courses: Lecturers’ beliefs and practices. Ibérica.38. 151-176

Gerakopolou, O. (2016): Scaffolding Oral Interaction in the CLIL Context: A Case Study. Selected Papers of the 21st International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (ISTAL 21), 602-613

Gondová, D. (2014): Scaffolding Learners in CLIL Lessons. INTED 2014 Proceedings. Valencia: IATED Academy. 1013-1020.

Hultgren, A. et al. (2015): Introduction: English-Medium Instruction in European Higher Education: From the North to the South. In: Dimova, S. Hultgren, A. and Jensen, C. (eds.) (2015): English-Medium Instruction in European Higher Education. de Gruyter: Boston / Berlin. 1-15

Macaro, E. et al. (2018): A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching. 51/1. 36-76

Mehisto, P. – Marsh, D. – Frigols, M. (2008): Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Oxford: Macmillan Education

Surmont, J. et al. (2014): Evaluating the CLIL student: Where to find the CLIL advantage. In: Breeze, R. et al. (eds.) (2014): Integration of theory and practice in CLIL. Rodopi, Amsterdam and New York. 55-72

Published
2021-11-04
Section
A kompetenciafejlesztés új útjai a szaknyelvoktatásban