Temporal references in pain narratives: The cognitive perspective

  • Monika Gyuró University of Pécs Faculty of Health Sciences Institute of Health Insurance
Keywords: temporal referencing, narrative, mental spaces, blending, temporal deixis

Abstract

The present study investigates how pain experience affects the cognitive representation of time and viewpoint in a particular genre and narrative. In patients’ reports, temporality of pain experience does not follow the objectively measurable time. The ongoing character of pain contains not only the present issues but also retains the preceding aspects of the here-and-now moment and anticipates the future notes as time unfolds. To describe this particular experience, I employ the cognitive -linguistic model of mental spaces and blending (Fauconnier – Turner, 2002). I analyze blog posts of patients with chronic diseases on the use of temporal deixis and tense focusing on the shifts realized between the Narrative Space embedding the Event Space in which the past events occurred and the Here-and-Now Space which comprises the narrator’s viewpoint as an Origo. Moreover, I presuppose the Intermediate Space between the Event Space and the Reality Space, providing a transition between the aforementioned spaces and legitimization of the reconstruction of the events (Van Krieken et al., 2016). Temporal overlapping proves that subjective experience steers tenses and temporal deixis which govern the construal of viewpoint and time in the narratives; therefore, time and viewpoint are immediately connected in the cognitive representation of the narratives.

References

Almeida, M.J. (1995): Time in narratives. In: Duchan, J.F. (ed) (1995): Deixis in narrative. 159-189. LEA: New Jersey.

Bergson, H. (2001): Time and Free Will. Dover Publications: New York. (Transl.Pogson,F.L.) Essai sur les donneés immediates de la conscience (1889)

Fauconnier, G. (1985): Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Fauconnier, G. – Turner, M. (2002): The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books: New York. doi.org.10.1027/s15516709cog2202_1

Gyuró, M. (2018): The Language of Pain: Quality, Thing, and Process. In: Bocz, Zs. –Besznyák, R. (szerk): Porta Lingua – 2018. SZOKOE: Budapest. 17/1. 165-176

Halliday, M.A.K. (1998): On the grammar of pain. Functions of Language, 5/1. 1-32.

https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.5.1.02hal

Husserl, E. (2019): The Phenomenology of Eternal Time-Consciousness. Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN. (Trans. Churchill, J.S.) Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1905)

Labov, W. – Waletzky, J. (1967): Narrative analysis. Journal of Pragmatics. 41/6 doi.org/10.1016.j.pragma.2009.01.003

Levinson, S.C. – Levinson,S. (1983): Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313

Levinson, S.C. (2006): Deixis and Pragmatics. In: Horn, L.R. – Ward, G.: Handbook of Pragmatic.s Chapter 5. Blackwell Publ. Ltd:London. doi.org.10.1002/9780470756959.ch5

Lyons, J. (1977): Semantics. Vol.1. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Sanders, J. – Van Krieken, K. (2019): Traveling through narrative time. Cognitive Linguistics. 30/2. 281-301.

https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0041

Toombs, S.K. (1990): The temporality in illness: Four levels of experience. Theoretical Medicine. 11. 227-241.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489832

Toombs, S.K. (2001): Reflections on Bodily Change: The lived experience of disability. In: Toombs, S.K. (ed.) (2001). Handbook of phenomenology and medicine. 247-261. Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0536-4

Van Krieken, K. – Sanders, J. – Hoeken, H. (2016): Blended viewpoints, mediated witnesses: A cognitive linguistic approach to news narratives. In: Dancygier, B. et al. (eds.) (2016): Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. 145-168. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365467-007

Van Krieken, K. (2018): Ambiguous perspective in narrative discourse: Effects of viewpoint markers and verb tense on readers’ interpretation of represented perceptions. Discourse Processes. 55/8. 771-781.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1381540

Internet source

https://lifeinpain.org/node/category/personal-stories/

Published
2021-11-04
Section
A tudományterületek nyelvhasználatának sajátosságai, szakfordítás