Strategies in interviewing of patients: linguistic tools for assertive communication and empathy in breaking bad news

  • Judit Szalai-Szolcsányi Pécsi Tudományegyetem Általános Orvostudományi Kar Egészségügyi Nyelvi és Kommunikációs Intézet Egészségtudományi Kar Egészségtudományi Doktori Iskola
Keywords: simulated doctor-patient communication, communication and empathy,, emotional awareness, emotional intelligence, compassion

Abstract

The study is a presentation of a research project that seeks to identify key linguistic tools through the applied linguistic and psychological analysis of doctor-patient interactions, the development of which enhances the doctor's ability to cooperate and empathize with the patient, thus facilitating the recovery. After several weeks of theoretical training and practice, the medical students involved in the study were assigned the task of breaking bad news to the patient acting simulator in a simulated situation. During the observed interactions, the communication process focused on the emergence and development of empathy. To measure this, we used an empathy scale. During the study, following the simulated doctor-patient interaction, the participants playing the role of the patient completed the empathy scale that was designed to measure how empathic a dialogue was in a given communication situation. The original Empathy Scale was developed in English, ‘The Patient-Professional Interaction Questionnaire (PPIQ) to Assess Patient Centered Care from the Patient’s Perspective’ (Casu – Sommaruga – Gremigni, 2018). Since this test effectively measures empathic communication during doctor-patient interaction and is available in both Hungarian and English, it is very useful for interviewing simulated patients in English and Hungarian courses. This study investigated the interactions of medical students in the English program.

References

Baile, W. F. – Buckman, R. – Lenzi R. et al., (2000): SPIKES – a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. The Oncologist. February 2000. 5/4. 302-311.

https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302

Batson, C. D. (2011): These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomena. In: Decety, J. – Ickes, W. (eds.) (2011): The Social Neurosciene of Empathy. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts

Buda, B. (1986): A közvetlen emberi kommunikáció szabályszerűségei. Animula Kiadó: Budapest

Casu, G. – Sommaruga, M. – Gremigni, P. (2018): The Patient-Professional Interaction Questionnaire (PPIQ) to assess patient centered care from the patient’s perspective. Patient Education and Counseling. 102/1. 126-133.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.006

Eslinger, P. J. (1998): Neurological and neuropsychological bases of empathy. European Neurology. 1998. 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1159/000007933

Hoffman, M. L. (2000): Empathy and Moral Development. Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge University Press: New York.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805851

Hojat, M. (2007): Empathy in Patient Care. Springer: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Hojat M. et al. (2011): Physicians' Empathy and Clinical Outcomes for Diabetic Patients. Academic medicine. Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 86/3. 359-64.

Elérhető online:

https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/fulltext/2011/03000/Physicians__Empathy_and_Clinical_Outcomes_for.26.aspx.

https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086fe1

Hojat M. et al. (2018): The Jefferson Scale of Empathy: a nationwide study of measurement properties, underlying components, latent variable structure, and national norms in medical students. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice. 2018 Dec. 23/5. 899-920.

Online elérhető:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10459-018-9839-9.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9839-9

Kaptchuk J.T. et al.(2010): Placebos without Deception: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. PLoS ONE. 5/12.

Online elérhető: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/ journal.pone.0015591.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015591

Pilling, J. (2011): Medical Communication. Medicina: Budapest

Pilling, J. (2018): Orvosi kommunikáció. Medicina: Budapest

Preston, S. D. – de Waal, F. B. M. (2002): Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 25. 1-72.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018

Silverman, J. – Kurtz, S. – Draper, J. (2013): Skills for Communicating with Patients. Radcliffe Publishing Ltd: London

Wispé, L. (1986): The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 50. 314-321.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.314

Zahn-Waxler, C. – Robinson, J. L. – Emde, R. N. (1992): The development of empathy in twins. Developmental Psychology. 28/6. 1038–1047.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1038

Published
2020-11-13
Section
A tudományterületek nyelvhasználatának sajátosságai, szakfordítás