National adaptation of an adolescent health literacy questionnaire

  • Cintia Horváth Eszterházy Károly Catholic University Faculty of Science, Eger
  • Tamás Csányi Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Primary and Pre-School Education, Budapest
  • László Révész Eszterházy Károly Catholic University Faculty of Science, Eger
Keywords: HELMA, health literacy, school health promotion

Abstract

Background: The measurement of health literacy is widely addressed by the international professional literature. The Health Literacy Measure for Adolescents is a tool in the field of health promotion in school environment that can measure students' health literacy, access to and understanding of information, their self-efficacy and the ability to communicate health information. The questionnaire includes 8 factors (Self-Efficacy, Access, Reading, Understanding, Appraisal, Use, Communication, and Numeracy) within 3–10 questions per factors. The aim of this article is to extend health literacy measurement tools with the questionnaire of the Health Literacy Measure for Adolescents, as well as to collect preliminary data related to the applicability of the questionnaire.

Methodology: The Hungarian version of the questionnaire was prepared in several phases. The first step was to translate the English-language questionnaire to Hungarian and back to English. Following the expert consultation the questionnaire was finalized. After the digitalization of the questionnaire, we started to collect the data among high school students (N = 273). Based on the recorded data, we analyzed the validity of HELMA-H questionnaire.

Results: 27.5% of the respondents were boys, 72.5% were girls, and their mean age was 16.2 (SD: 1.3) years. 78.4% of the examined students studied in a grammar school, 12.8% in a vocational grammar school, 8.4% in a vocational secondary school, and 0.4% in a vocational school. Examining the reliability of the questionnaire, we can state that the Cronbach's alpha value for the entire questionnaire is 0.96, so the reliability of the instrument is high.

Conclusions: According to the statistical analyzes, the questionnaire meets the criteria of reliability. The Hungarian version of HELMA can be used to measure the health literacy of adolescents.

Author Biographies

Cintia Horváth, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University Faculty of Science, Eger

 

 
Tamás Csányi, Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Primary and Pre-School Education, Budapest

 

 
László Révész, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University Faculty of Science, Eger

 

 

References

Abel, T., Hofmann, K., Ackermann, S., Bucher, S., & Sakarya, S. (2014). Health literacy among young adults: a short survey tool for public health and health promotion research. Health Promotion International, 30(3), 725–735. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat096

Borzekowski, D. L. (2009). Considering children and health literacy: A theoretical approach. Pediatrics, 124 (Suppl. 3), 282–288. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1162d

Brown S. L., Teufel J. A., & Birch D. A. (2007). Early adolescents perceptions of health and health literacy. Journal of School Health, 77(1), 7–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00156.x

Bröder, J., Okan, O., Bauer, U., Bruland, D., Schlupp, S., Bollweg, T. M., Saboga-Nunes, L., Bond, E., Sørensen, K., & Bitzer, E. M. (2017). Health literacy in childhood and youth: A systematic review of definitions and models. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4267-y

Bröder, J., Okan, O., Bauer, U., Schlupp, S., & Pinheiro, P. (2020). Advancing perspectives on health literacy in childhood and youth. Health Promotion International, 35(3), 575–585. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz041

Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555

Csizmadia, P. (2016). Az egészségműveltség definíciói. Egészségfejlesztés, 57(3), 41–44. doi: 10.24365/ef.v57i3.68

Dodson, S., Good, S., & Osborne, R. H. (2015). Health literacy toolkit for low- and middle-income countries: a series of information sheets to empower communities and strengthen health systems. World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia. http://apps.searo.who.int/PDS_DOCS/B5148.pdf

Ghaddar, S. F., Valerio, M. A., Garcia, C. M., & Hansen, L. (2012). Adolescent health literacy: the importance of credible sources for online health information. Journal of School Health, 82(1), 28–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00664.x

Ghanbari, S., Ramezankhani, A., Montazeri, A., & Mehrabi, Y. (2016). Health Literacy Measure for Adolescents (HELMA): Development and Psychometric Properties. PLoS ONE 11(2), e0149202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149202

Guo, S., Armstrong, R., Waters, E., Sathish, T., Alif, S. M., Browne, R. G., & Yu, X. (2018). Quality of health literacy instruments used in children and adolescents: a systematic review. BMJ Open, 8(6), e020080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020080

Jordan, S., Domanska, O., & Loer, A. K. (2020). Health literacy in adolescence: Requirements for measurement tools. In: Bollweg, T. M., Bröder, J., & Pinheiro, P. (Eds.), Health Literacy im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Ein- und Ausblicke (pp. 99–115). Springer. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082860

Manganello, J. A. (2008). Health literacy and adolescents: a framework and agenda for future research. Health Education Research, 23(5), 840–847. doi: 10.1093/her/cym069

Manganello, J. A. & Shone, L. P. (2013). Health Literacy: Research FACTS and findings. ACT for Youth Center of Excellence.

Massey, P., Prelip, M., Calimlim, B. M., Quiter, E. S., & Glik, D. C. (2012). Contextualizing an expanded definition of health literacy among adolescents in the health care setting, Health Education Research, 27(6), 961–974. doi: 10.1093/her/cys054

Massey, P., Prelip, M., Calimlim, B., Afifi, A., Quiter, E., Nessim, S., Wongvipat-Kalev, N., & Glik, D. (2013). Findings toward a multidimensional measure of adolescent health literacy. American Journal of Health Behavior, 37(3), 342–350. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.3.7

Nagy, L., Korom, E., Hódi, Á., & B. Németh, M. (2015). Az egészségműveltség online mérése. In: Csapó, B. & Zsolnai, A. (Eds.), Online diagnosztikus mérések az iskola kezdő szakaszában (pp.147–177). Oktatáskutató és Fejlesztő Intézet.

Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259–267. doi: 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259

Nutbeam, D. (2008). The evolving concept of health literacy. Social Science & Medicine, 67(12), 2072–2078. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050

Okan, O., Lopes, E., Bollweg, T. M., Bröder, J., Messer, M., Bruland, D., Bond, E., Carvalho, G. S., Sørensen, K., & Saboga-Nunes, L. (2018). Generic health literacy measurement instruments for children and adolescents: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5054-0

Santoro, K., & Speedling, C. (2011). The case for investing in youth health literacy: One step on the path to achieving health equity for adolescents. NIHCM Issue Brief, 1–15. https://nihcm.org/publications/the-case-for-investing-in-youth-health-literacy-one-step-on-the-path-to-achieving-health-equity-for-adolescents

Simonds, S. K. (1974). Health education as social policy. Health Education Monograph, 2(1_supl), 1–10. doi: 10.1177/10901981740020S102

Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Fullam, J., Brand H., Doyle, G., Pelikan, J., & Slonska, Z. (2012). Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80

Szokolszky Á. (2004). Kutatómunka a pszichológiában. Osiris Kiadó. https://regi.tankonyvtar.hu/hu/tartalom/tamop425/2011_0001_520_kutatomunka_a_pszichologiaban/index.html

World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO Europe) (2013). Health Literacy. The Solid Facts. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/128703/e96854.pdf

Published
2021-12-10
How to Cite
Horváth, C., Csányi, T., & Révész, L. (2021). National adaptation of an adolescent health literacy questionnaire. Health Promotion, 62(4), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.24365/ef.v62i4.7498
Section
Research