Lower combined and implant borne upper fixed full arch prostheses using static Computer Assisted Implant Surgery

Case report

  • Tamás Seereiner Semmelweis Egyetem Fogászati és Szájsebészeti Oktató Intézet
  • Márton Kivovics Semmelweis Egyetem Fogászati és Szájsebészeti Oktató Intézet
Keywords: dental implant, surgical guide, static navigation, computer-assisted implant surgery

Abstract

Reverse planning in contemporary implantology means that the number, dimensions, position, and inclination of dental implants placed are determined by prosthodontic design. This facilitates optimal aesthetic results and function, an ideal biomechanical loading for all components of the prosthesis, and a long-term stability of soft and hard tissues surrounding the implants. Navigated implant placement aims to reproduce planned positions during implant surgery. During static computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS), planned implant positions are reproduced by the surgical template. Static CAIS decreases postoperative morbidity and surgical time, which makes it an advantageous treatment modality in the management of elderly patients. In our case report, we present the delivery of a combined prosthesis in the lower jaw and a full arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis using static CAIS for the upper jaw.

References

Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W: Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29 Suppl, 25-42. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.2

Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G, Jacobs R, Quirynen M: Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: Modalities and indications. Periodontol 2000 2014; 66, 214-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12056

Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M: Computer-supported implant planning and guided surgery: A narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26 Suppl 11, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12638

Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T: Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: Surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21, 980-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01957.x

Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M: The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17, 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0

Liu YF, Wu JL, ZhangJX, PengW, Liao WQ: Numerical and experimental analyses on the temperature distribution in the dental implant preparation area when using a surgical guide. J Prosthodont 2018; 27, 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12488

Pozzi A, Tallarico M, Marchetti M, Scarfò B, Esposito M: Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014; 7, 229-242.

Fortin T, Bosson Jl, Isidori M, BlanchetE: Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in implant placement using an image-guided system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21, 298-304.

Boa k, barrak i, varga EJr, joob-fancsaly a, varga e, piffko J: Intraosseous generation of heat during guided surgical drilling: An ex vivo study of the effect of the temperature of the irrigating fluid. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 54, 904-908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.06.004

Hämmerle CH, Cordaro L, Van Assche N, BenicGI, Bornstein M, Gamper F, et al: Digital technologies to support planning, treatment, and fabrication processes and outcome assessments in implant dentistry. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO consensus conference 2015. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26 Suppl 11, 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12648

Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flügge T, Fokas G, Tahmaseb A, Bechelli D, et al: Group 5 iti consensus report: Digital technologies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 Suppl 16, 436-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13309

Kivovics M, Pénzes D, Németh O, Mijiritsky E: The influence of surgical experience and bone density on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in edentulous jaws using a mucosa-supported surgical template with a half-guided implant placement protocol-a randomized clinical study. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245759

SchimmelM, Müller F, Suter V, Buser D: Implants for elderly patients. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73, 228-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12166

Colombo M, Mangano C, Mijiritsky E, Krebs M, HauschildU, Fortin T: Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: A critical review based on randomized controlled trials. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17, 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0441-y

Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Stefanelli Lv, Cavallini C: The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42, 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.010

Fabbri G, Sorrentino R, Cannistraro G, Mintrone F, Bacherini L, Turrini R: Increasing the Vertical Dimension of Occlusion: A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Comparative Study on 100 Patients with Fixed Tooth-Supported, Mixed, and Implant-Supported Full-Arch Rehabilitations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018; 38, 323-335. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3295

Lima AF, Cavalcanti AL, Martins LR, Marchi GM: Occlusal interferences: how can this concept influence the clinical practice? Eur J Dent 2010; 4, 487-491. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697870

Abduo J, Lyons K: Clinical considerations for increasing occlusal vertical dimension: a review. Aust Dent J 2012; 57, 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01640.x

Nagy ZS, SchmidtP, Hermann P: The importance of individual mandibular movements in case of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Case report. Fogorv Szle 2012; 105, 167-171.

Nagy ZS, SchmidtP, Hermann P: Complex prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with temporomandibular dysfunction. Case report. Fogorv Szle 2013; 106, 7-10.

JONES A: Accuracy of mucosa supported guided dental implant surgery. Clin Case Rep 2018; 6, 2131-2139. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.1809

RungcharassaengK, Caruso JM, Kan JY, Schutyser F, Boumans T: Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: A comparison of operator experience. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114, 407-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.004

Seo C, Juodzbalys G: Accuracy of guided surgery via stereolithographic mucosa-supported surgical guide in implant surgery for edentulous patient: A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2018; 9, e1. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2018.9101

Varga E. Jr, AntalM, Major L, Kiscsatári R, Braunitzer G, Piffkó J: Guidance means accuracy: A randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020; 31, 417-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13578

Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, NaertI, Jacobs R, Teughels W, Quirynen, M: Depth and lateral deviations in guided implant surgery: An rct comparing guided surgery with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26, 1315-1320.

https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12460

Vercruyssen M, CoxC, Coucke W, NaertI, Jacobs R, Quirynen M: A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. J Clin Periodontol 2014; 41, 717-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12231

Vermeulen J: The accuracy of implant placement by experienced surgeons: Guided vs freehand approach in a simulated plastic model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017; 32, 617-624. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5065

Younes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyckere T, CleymaetR, BouckaertE, Eghbali A: A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol 2018; 45, 721-732. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12897

Cassetta M, Bellardini M: How much does experience in guided implant surgery play a role in accuracy? A randomized controlled pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46, 922-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.010

Cushen SE, TurkyilmazI: Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109, 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60053-0

Fernández-GilÁ, GilHS, Velasco MG, Moreno VázquezJC: An An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided implant placement based on the surgeon’s experience. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017; 32, 151-154. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5024

Hinckfuss S, ConradHJ, Lin L, Lunos S, SeongWJ: Effect of surgical guide design and surgeon’s experience on the accuracy of implant placement. J Oral Implantol 2012; 38, 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00046

Jorba-García A, Figueiredo R, González-Barnadas A, Camps-FontO, Valmaseda-Castellón E: Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in-vitro study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2019; 24, e76-e83. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22785

Marei HF, Abdel-Hady A, Al-Khalifa K, Al-Mahalawy H: Influence of surgeon experience on the accuracy of implant placement via a partially computer-guided surgical protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019; 34, 1177-1183. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7480

Ochi M, Kanazawa M, Sato D, Kasugai S, Hirano S, Minakuchi S: Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles. Comput Biol Med 2013; 43, 1653-1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.07.029

Ozan O, Orhan K, TurkyilmazI: Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using ct-generated surgical guides. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22, 1755-1761. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e6305

Park SJ, Leesungbok R, Cui T, Lee SW, Ahn SJ: Reliability of a cad/cam surgical guide for implant placement: An in vitro comparison of surgeons’ experience levels and implant sites. Int J Prosthodont 2017; 30, 367-169. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5179

Putra RH, Yoda N, Iikubo M, Kataoka Y, Yamauchi K, Koyama S, et al: Influence of bone condition on implant placement accuracy with computer-guided surgery. Int J Implant Dent 2020; 6, 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00249-z

Toyoshima T, Tanaka H, Sasaki M, Ichimaru E, Naito Y, Matsushita Y, et al: Accuracy of implant surgery with surgical guide by inexperienced clinicians: An in vitro study. Clin Exp Dent Res 2015; 1, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.3

Barter S: Surgical Considerations in the Aging Patient. In: Wismeijer D, Chen S, Buser D (szerk.): ITI Treatment Guide Volume 9 Implant Therapy in the Geriatric Patient. Quintessence publishing Co, Ltd, Berlin 2016; 133-144.

Published
2022-03-16
How to Cite
SeereinerT., & KivovicsM. (2022). Lower combined and implant borne upper fixed full arch prostheses using static Computer Assisted Implant Surgery: Case report. Hungarian Journal of Dentistry, 115(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.33891/FSZ.114.1.37-44
Section
Case report

Most read articles by the same author(s)